arXiv subjects

Erel Segal-Halevi

Publications and source records attributed to Erel Segal-Halevi.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

arXiv2022

On Fair Division under Heterogeneous Matroid Constraints

We study fair allocation of indivisible goods among additive agents with feasibility constraints. In these settings, every agent is restricted to get a bundle among a specified set of feasible bundles. Such scenarios have been of great interest to the AI community due to their applicability to real-world problems. Following some impossibility results, we restrict attention to matroid feasibility constraints that capture natural scenarios, such as the allocation of shifts to medical doctors, and the allocation of conference papers to referees. We focus on the common fairness notion of envy-freeness up to one good (EF1). Previous algorithms for finding EF1 allocations are either restricted to agents with identical feasibility constraints, or allow free disposal of items. An open problem is the existence of EF1 complete allocations among heterogeneous agents, where the heterogeneity is both in the agents' feasibility constraints and in their valuations. In this work, we make progress on this problem by providing positive and negative results for different matroid and valuation types. Among other results, we devise polynomial-time algorithms for finding EF1 allocations in the following settings: (i) $n$ agents with heterogeneous partition matroids and heterogeneous binary valuations, (ii) 2 agents with heterogeneous partition matroids and heterogeneous additive valuations, and (iii) at most 3 agents with heterogeneous binary valuations and identical base-orderable matroid constraints.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2022

Envy-free Matchings in Bipartite Graphs and their Applications to Fair Division

A matching in a bipartite graph with parts X and Y is called envy-free if no unmatched vertex in X is a adjacent to a matched vertex in Y. Every perfect matching is envy-free, but envy-free matchings exist even when perfect matchings do not. We prove that every bipartite graph has a unique partition such that all envy-free matchings are contained in one of the partition sets. Using this structural theorem, we provide a polynomial-time algorithm for finding an envy-free matching of maximum cardinality. For edge-weighted bipartite graphs, we provide a polynomial-time algorithm for finding a maximum-cardinality envy-free matching of minimum total weight. We show how envy-free matchings can be used in various fair division problems with either continuous resources ("cakes") or discrete ones. In particular, we propose a symmetric algorithm for proportional cake-cutting, an algorithm for 1-out-of-(2n-2) maximin-share allocation of discrete goods, and an algorithm for 1-out-of-floor(2n/3) maximin-share allocation of discrete bads among n agents.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2022

Fairness for Multi-Self Agents

We investigate whether fairness is compatible with efficiency in economies with multi-self agents, who may not be able to integrate their multiple objectives into a single complete and transitive ranking. We adapt envy-freeness, egalitarian-equivalence and the fair-share guarantee in two different ways. An allocation is unambiguously-fair if it satisfies the chosen criterion of fairness according to every objective of any agent; it is aggregate-fair if it satisfies the criterion for some aggregation of each agent's objectives. While efficiency is always compatible with the unambiguous fair-share guarantee, it is incompatible with unambiguous envy-freeness in economics with at least three agents. Two agents are enough for efficiency and unambiguous egalitarian-equivalence to clash. Efficiency and the unambiguous fair-share guarantee can be attained together with aggregate envy-freeness, or aggregate egalitarian-equivalence.

econ.TH↗

arXiv2022

Ordinal Maximin Share Approximation for Goods

In fair division of indivisible goods, $\ell$-out-of-$d$ maximin share (MMS) is the value that an agent can guarantee by partitioning the goods into $d$ bundles and choosing the $\ell$ least preferred bundles. Most existing works aim to guarantee to all agents a constant fraction of their 1-out-of-$n$ MMS. But this guarantee is sensitive to small perturbation in agents' cardinal valuations. We consider a more robust approximation notion, which depends only on the agents' \emph{ordinal} rankings of bundles. We prove the existence of $\ell$-out-of-$\lfloor(\ell+\frac{1}{2})n\rfloor$ MMS allocations of goods for any integer $\ell\geq 1$, and present a polynomial-time algorithm that finds a $1$-out-of-$\lceil\frac{3n}{2}\rceil$ MMS allocation when $\ell = 1$. We further develop an algorithm that provides a weaker ordinal approximation to MMS for any $\ell > 1$.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2022

Efficient Fair Division with Minimal Sharing

A collection of objects, some of which are good and some are bad, is to be divided fairly among agents with different tastes, modeled by additive utility functions. If the objects cannot be shared, so that each of them must be entirely allocated to a single agent, then a fair division may not exist. What is the smallest number of objects that must be shared between two or more agents in order to attain a fair and efficient division? In this paper, fairness is understood as proportionality or envy-freeness, and efficiency, as fractional Pareto-optimality. We show that, for a generic instance of the problem (all instances except a zero-measure set of degenerate problems), a fair fractionally Pareto-optimal division with the smallest possible number of shared objects can be found in polynomial time, assuming that the number of agents is fixed. The problem becomes computationally hard for degenerate instances, where agents' valuations are aligned for many objects.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2022

Fair Cake-Cutting in Practice

Using a lab experiment, we investigate the real-life performance of envy-free and proportional cake-cutting procedures with respect to fairness and preference manipulation. We find that envy-free procedures, in particular Selfridge-Conway, are fairer and also are perceived as fairer than their proportional counterparts, despite the fact that agents very often manipulate them. Our results support the practical use of the celebrated Selfridge-Conway procedure, and more generally, of envy-free cake-cutting mechanisms. We also find that subjects learn their opponents' preferences after repeated interaction and use this knowledge to improve their allocated share of the cake. Learning reduces truth-telling behavior, but also reduces envy.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2022

Ordinal Maximin Share Approximation for Chores

We study the problem of fairly allocating a set of m indivisible chores (items with non-positive value) to n agents. We consider the desirable fairness notion of 1-out-of-d maximin share (MMS) -- the minimum value that an agent can guarantee by partitioning items into d bundles and receiving the least valued bundle -- and focus on ordinal approximation of MMS that aims at finding the largest d <= n for which 1-out-of-d MMS allocation exists. Our main contribution is a polynomial-time algorithm for 1-out-of-floor(2n/3) MMS allocation, and a proof of existence of 1-out-of-floor(3n/4) MMS allocation of chores. Furthermore, we show how to use recently-developed algorithms for bin-packing to approximate the latter bound up to a logarithmic factor in polynomial time.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2021

Redividing the Cake

The paper considers fair allocation of resources that are already allocated in an unfair way. This setting requires a careful balance between the fairness considerations and the rights of the present owners. The paper presents re-division algorithms that attain various trade-off points between fairness and ownership rights, in various settings differing in the geometric constraints on the allotments: (a) no geometric constraints; (b) connectivity -- the cake is a one-dimensional interval and each piece must be a contiguous interval; (c) rectangularity -- the cake is a two-dimensional rectangle or rectilinear polygon and the pieces should be rectangles; (d) convexity -- the cake is a two-dimensional convex polygon and the pieces should be convex. These re-division algorithms have implications on another problem: the price-of-fairness -- the loss of social welfare caused by fairness requirements. Each algorithm implies an upper bound on the price-of-fairness with the respective geometric constraints.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2021

On Monotonicity of Number-Partitioning Algorithms

An algorithm for number-partitioning is called value-monotone if whenever one of the input numbers increases, the objective function (the largest sum or the smallest sum of a subset in the output) weakly increases. This note proves that the List Scheduling algorithm and the Longest Processing Time algorithm are both value-monotone. This is in contrast to another algorithm -- MultiFit -- which is not value-monotone.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2021

Graphical Cake Cutting via Maximin Share

We study the recently introduced cake-cutting setting in which the cake is represented by an undirected graph. This generalizes the canonical interval cake and allows for modeling the division of road networks. We show that when the graph is a forest, an allocation satisfying the well-known criterion of maximin share fairness always exists. Our result holds even when separation constraints are imposed, in which case no multiplicative approximation of proportionality can be guaranteed. Furthermore, while maximin share fairness is not always achievable for general graphs, we prove that ordinal relaxations can be attained.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2020

Fair Multi-Cake Cutting

In the classic problem of fair cake-cutting, a single interval ("cake") has to be divided among n agents with different value measures, giving each agent a single sub-interval with a value of at least 1/n of the total. This paper studies a generalization in which the cake is made of m disjoint intervals, and each agent should get at most k sub-intervals. The paper presents a polynomial-time algorithm that guarantees to each agent at least min(1/n, k/(m+n-1)) of the total value, and shows that this is the largest fraction that can be guaranteed. The algorithm simultaneously guarantees to each agent at least 1/n of the value that the agent can get without partners to share with. The main technical tool is envy-free matching in a bipartite graph. Some of the results remain valid even with additional fairness constraints such as envy-freeness. Besides the natural application of the algorithm to simultaneous division of multiple land-estates, the paper shows an application to a geometric problem -- fair division of a two-dimensional land estate shaped as a rectilinear polygon, where each agent should receive a rectangular piece.

math.CO↗

arXiv2020

How to Cut a Cake Fairly: A Generalization to Groups

A fundamental result in cake cutting states that for any number of players with arbitrary preferences over a cake, there exists a division of the cake such that every player receives a single contiguous piece and no player is left envious. We generalize this result by showing that it is possible to partition the players into groups of any desired sizes and divide the cake among the groups, so that each group receives a single contiguous piece and no player finds the piece of another group better than that of the player's own group.

econ.TH↗

arXiv2020

Generalized Rental Harmony

Rental Harmony is the problem of assigning rooms in a rented house to tenants with different preferences, and simultaneously splitting the rent among them, such that no tenant envies the bundle (room+price) given to another tenant. Different papers have studied this problem under two incompatible assumptions: the miserly tenants assumption is that each tenant prefers a free room to a non-free room; the quasilinear tenants assumption is that each tenant attributes a monetary value to each room, and prefers a room of which the difference between value and price is maximum. This note shows how to adapt the main technique used for rental harmony with miserly tenants, using Sperner's lemma, to a much more general class of preferences, that contains both miserly and quasilinear tenants as special cases. This implies that some recent results derived for miserly tenants apply to this more general preference class too.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2020

Competitive Equilibrium For Almost All Incomes: Existence and Fairness

Competitive equilibrium (CE) is a fundamental concept in market economics. Its efficiency and fairness properties make it particularly appealing as a rule for fair allocation of resources among agents with possibly different entitlements. However, when the resources are indivisible, a CE might not exist even when there is one resource and two agents with equal incomes. Recently, Babaioff and Nisan and Talgam-Cohen (2017) have suggested to consider the entire space of possible incomes, and check whether there exists a competitive equilibrium for almost all income-vectors --- all income-space except a subset of measure zero. They proved various existence and non-existence results, but left open the cases of four goods and three or four agents with monotonically-increasing preferences. This paper proves non-existence in both these cases, thus completing the characterization of CE existence for almost all incomes in the domain of monotonically increasing preferences. Additionally, the paper provides a complete characterization of CE existence in the domain of monotonically decreasing preferences, corresponding to allocation of chores. On the positive side, the paper proves that CE exists for almost all incomes when there are four goods and three agents with additive preferences. The proof uses a new tool for describing a CE, as a subgame-perfect equilibrium of a specific sequential game. The same tool also enables substantially simpler proofs to the cases already proved by Babaioff et al. Additionally, this paper proves several strong fairness properties that are satisfied by any CE allocation, illustrating its usefulness for fair allocation among agents with different entitlements.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2019

The Maximin Share Dominance Relation

Given a finite set $X$ and an ordering $\succeq$ over its subsets, the $l$-out-of-$d$ maximin-share of $X$ is the maximal (by $\succeq$) subset of $X$ that can be constructed by partitioning $X$ into $d$ parts and picking the worst union of $l$ parts. A pair of integers $(l,d)$ dominates a pair $(l',d')$ if, for any set $X$ and ordering $\succeq$, the $l$-out-of-$d$ maximin-share of $X$ is at least as good (by $\succeq$) as the $l'$-out-of-$d'$ maximin-share of $X$. This note presents a necessary and sufficient condition for deciding whether a given pair of integers dominates another pair, and an algorithm for finding all non-dominated pairs. It compares the $l$-out-of-$d$ maximin-share to some other criteria for fair allocation of indivisible objects among people with different entitlements.

math.CO↗

arXiv2019

Strongly Budget Balanced Auctions for Multi-Sided Markets

In two-sided markets, Myerson and Satterthwaite's impossibility theorem states that one can not maximize the gain-from-trade while also satisfying truthfulness, individual-rationality and no deficit. Attempts have been made to circumvent Myerson and Satterthwaite's result by attaining approximately-maximum gain-from-trade: the double-sided auctions of McAfee (1992) is truthful and has no deficit, and the one by Segal-Halevi et al. (2016) additionally has no surplus --- it is strongly-budget-balanced. They consider two categories of agents --- buyers and sellers, where each trade set is composed of a single buyer and a single seller. The practical complexity of applications such as supply chain require one to look beyond two-sided markets. Common requirements are for: buyers trading with multiple sellers of different or identical items, buyers trading with sellers through transporters and mediators, and sellers trading with multiple buyers. We attempt to address these settings. We generalize Segal-Halevi et al. (2016)'s strongly-budget-balanced double-sided auction setting to a multilateral market where each trade set is composed of any number of agent categories. Our generalization refines the notion of competition in multi-sided auctions by introducing the concepts of external competition and trade reduction. We also show an obviously-truthful implementation of our auction using multiple ascending prices.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2019

Fair and Square: Cake-cutting in Two Dimensions

We consider the problem of fairly dividing a two dimensional heterogeneous good among multiple players. Applications include division of land as well as ad space in print and electronic media. Classical cake cutting protocols primarily consider a one-dimensional resource, or allocate each player multiple infinitesimally small "pieces". In practice, however, the two dimensional \emph{shape} of the allotted piece is of crucial importance in many applications (e.g. squares or bounded aspect-ratio rectangles are most useful for building houses, as well as advertisements). We thus introduce and study the problem of fair two-dimensional division wherein the allotted plots must be of some restricted two-dimensional geometric shape(s). Adding this geometric constraint re-opens most questions and challenges related to cake-cutting. Indeed, even the elementary \emph{proportionality} fairness criteria can no longer be guaranteed in all cases. In this paper we thus examine the \emph{level} of proportionality that \emph{can} be guaranteed, providing both impossibility results (for proportionality that cannot be guaranteed), and algorithmic constructions (for proportionality that can be guaranteed). We focus primarily on the case when the cake is a rectilinear polygon and the allotted plots must be squares or bounded aspect-ratio rectangles.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2019

Obvious Manipulations in Cake-Cutting

In cake-cutting, strategy-proofness is a very costly requirement in terms of fairness: for n=2 it implies a dictatorial allocation, whereas for n > 2 it requires that one agent receives no cake. We show that a weaker version of this property recently suggested by Troyan and Morril, called non-obvious manipulability, is compatible with the strong fairness property of proportionality, which guarantees that each agent receives 1/n of the cake. Both properties are satisfied by the leftmost leaves mechanism, an adaptation of the Dubins - Spanier moving knife procedure. Most other classical proportional mechanisms in literature are obviously manipulable, including the original moving knife mechanism. Non-obvious manipulability explains why leftmost leaves is manipulated less often in practice than other proportional mechanisms.

cs.GT↗