Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Eric Tchetgen Tchetgen

Publications and source records attributed to Eric Tchetgen Tchetgen.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

ProximalFM: Amortized Proximal Causal Inference under Hidden Confounding

Standard causal identification methods often assume no unmeasured confounding and can fail when relevant confounders are unobserved. Proximal causal inference instead uses proxy variables to identify effects under hidden confounding. However, nonparametric proximal estimation can be challenging in practice: recovering causal estimands such as the conditional average treatment effect (CATE) requires solving an ill-posed integral equation that is data-hungry, hyperparameter-sensitive, and optimization-unstable. Bayesian inference for such models provides a desirable alternative, mitigating these difficulties by regularizing through the prior. However, computing a posterior is itself challenging, as a typical likelihood function will include latent variables. Following the recent success of tabular foundation models in backdoor, instrumental variable, and frontdoor settings, we propose that prior-data fitted networks (PFNs) are uniquely suited to resolve this bottleneck. Indeed, by training on synthetic data sampled from compliant structural causal models with access to oracle counterfactuals, we simplify the task substantially, amortizing the implied Bayesian operator inversion into a single transformer forward pass. Compared to prior literature that focuses primarily on point estimation, our model, ProximalFM, explicitly targets the Bayesian posterior distribution of the CATE. One unique aspect of this problem is that we need to provide Monte Carlo estimates of the oracle CATEs, leading to a novel variation of PFNs that accounts for the added stochastic error. Across a diverse suite of proximal regimes, ProximalFM achieves consistently strong CATE-estimation performance without dataset-specific tuning, with its largest advantage when latent confounding is substantial and the proxies are weakly informative; it also provides fast inference through a single amortized forward pass.

stat.ML↗

Generalized Hierarchical Conformal Prediction

Many prediction problems arise with data collected in groups. In this setting, hierarchical conformal prediction (HCP) (Lee et al., 2026) provides distribution-free prediction sets for a new observation from a previously unseen group under hierarchical exchangeability. In many applications, however, prediction is conducted only after a few observations from the group of interest have already been collected. Standard HCP cannot leverage these observations, as its required symmetry conditions do not hold in this setting. At the same time, the initial sample may still be too small for standard conformal prediction applied within the test group to be informative. We develop predictive inference methods for this setting. Our proposed method, Generalized HCP (GHCP), restores the relevant symmetry needed for conformal inference by assigning the test group a randomly "donated" reference group size. GHCP further leverages the initial test group observations to improve the quality of the nonconformity scores for prediction within that group. To improve efficiency, we introduce a variant that restricts the set of eligible donors. We demonstrate the performance of the proposed method through simulations and an illustration on the American Community Survey dataset.

stat.ME↗

Sharp Minimax Theory for Randomized Experiments

We study minimax-optimal designs and estimators for estimating the sample average treatment effect in finite population randomized experiments, where both design and estimator are unrestricted. For binary potential outcomes, we show this minimax risk is equivalent to the minimax risk $ρ_n^*$ of an estimation problem with $2$ unknown parameters. We leverage this reduction to establish a second-order risk expansion $ρ_n^* = n^{-1} - Cn^{-4/3} + o_n(n^{-4/3})$ for an explicit constant $C$ related to the Airy function. The minimax risk is attained by Bernoulli randomization with a nonlinear shrinkage estimator. Our results show that standard procedures such as complete randomization with difference in means are only minimax optimal up to first order in $n.$ We derive further results on admissibility of these procedures and discuss the practical implications of our results.

math.ST↗

Partial Identification of Causal Effects Using Proxy Variables

Proximal causal inference is a framework for evaluating the causal effects in the presence of unmeasured confounding. For point identification, it leverages a pair of proxy variables to identify a bridge function that matches the dependence of potential outcomes or treatment variables on the hidden factors to corresponding functions of observed proxies. Unique identification requires that proxies are sufficiently relevant for hidden factors, a requirement that has previously been formalized as a completeness condition. However, completeness is not empirically testable, and although a bridge function may be well-defined in a given setting, lack of completeness, sometimes manifested by availability of a single type of proxy, may severely limit prospects for identification of a bridge function and thus a causal effect; therefore, potentially restricting the application of the framework. In this paper, we propose partial identification methods that do not require completeness and obviate the need for identification of a bridge function. We establish that proxies can be leveraged to obtain bounds on the causal effect even if available information does not suffice to identify either a bridge function or a corresponding causal effect of interest. Our bounds are non-smooth functionals of the underlying distribution. For inference, we employ LogSumExp approximations that yield smooth lower and upper bounds, and we derive the efficient influence functions of the resulting bound functionals which enable analytic variance estimation, while bootstrap confidence intervals remain available for regular plug-in implementations. We further establish analogous results in related settings where identification hinges upon hidden mediators for which proxies are available, however such proxies are not sufficiently rich for point identification of a bridge function or a corresponding causal effect of interest.

stat.ME↗

Structural Nested Mean Models Under Parallel Trends Assumptions

We link and extend two approaches to estimating time-varying treatment effects on repeated continuous outcomes--time-varying Difference in Differences (DiD; see Roth et al. (2023) and Chaisemartin et al. (2023) for reviews) and Structural Nested Mean Models (SNMMs; see Vansteelandt and Joffe (2014) for a review). In particular, we show that SNMMs, previously known to be nonparametrically identified under a no unobserved confounding assumption, are also identified under a conditional parallel trends assumption similar to those typically used to justify time-varying DiD methods (but more amenable to time-varying confounding). Because SNMMs model a broader set of causal estimands, our results allow practitioners of time-varying DiD approaches to address additional types of substantive questions under similar assumptions. SNMMs enable estimation of time-varying effect heterogeneity, lasting effects of a `blip' of treatment at a single time point, effects of sustained interventions (possibly on continuous or multi-dimensional treatments) when treatment repeatedly changes value in the data, controlled direct effects, effects of dynamic treatment strategies that depend on covariate history, and more. We provide a method for sensitivity analysis to violations of our parallel trends assumption. We further explain how to estimate optimal treatment regimes via optimal regime SNMMs under parallel trends assumptions plus an assumption that there is no effect modification by unobserved confounders. Finally, we illustrate our methods with real data applications estimating effects of Medicaid expansion on uninsurance rates, effects of floods on flood insurance take-up, and effects of sustained changes in temperature on crop yields.

stat.ME↗

Causal Inference with a Hidden Treatment

In many causal inference settings, the treatment of interest is not directly observed; instead, one or more error-prone proxy measurements are available, creating a fundamental identification challenge. Building on identification methods for hidden treatments with proxies, we develop a general semiparametric framework for causal effect estimation that accommodates several common estimands. Hidden treatment models differ fundamentally from classical missing-data settings, where semiparametric theory relies on positivity requiring a nonzero probability of observing a complete case for each treatment value. Here this assumption fails by design because the true treatment is never observed, creating new challenges for semiparametric characterization and efficient estimation. To overcome these challenges, we develop a new semiparametric characterization for hidden treatment models by deriving a formal mapping between the orthogonal complement to the nuisance tangent space, which contains all influence functions for a causal functional in the oracle full-data model, and its counterpart in the observed hidden treatment model. This mapping gives closed-form observed-data influence functions and yields the semiparametric efficiency bound. It also leads to semiparametric efficient estimators with a new form of multiple robustness or mixed bias property, enabling inference with nonparametric nuisance estimators. A further challenge is that some nuisance functions depend on the hidden treatment, preventing direct use of standard nonparametric regression methods. We introduce an iterative estimation algorithm and establish its large-sample properties. Simulations demonstrate the finite-sample performance of the proposed estimators, and an application estimates the causal effect of Alzheimer's disease on hippocampal volume using data from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative.

stat.ME↗

A Nonparametric Framework for Universal Difference-in-Differences

Difference-in-differences (DiD) is a popular approach to evaluate treatment effects in settings where both pre- and post-treatment measurements of the outcome are available. Despite its popularity, existing methods face important limitations. Specifically, they either: (i) only apply to continuous outcomes and the average treatment effect on the treated; (ii) are sensitive to the transformation of the outcome; (iii) rely on a no unmeasured confounding assumption given pre-treatment covariates and outcome; (iv) lack semiparametric efficiency theory. In this paper, we introduce a novel framework for causal identification and inference in DiD settings that overcomes limitations (i)-(iv), making it the only existing framework that simultaneously satisfies these properties. Key to our framework is an odds ratio equi-confounding assumption, which states that the generalized odds ratio function relating treatment and treatment-free potential outcome is stable across time periods, a form of distributional parallel trends assumption. Under this assumption, we establish nonparametric identification of virtually any standard treatment effect on the treated, including quantile treatment effects on the treated. We also develop corresponding consistent, asymptotically linear, and semiparametric efficient estimators that leverage modern statistical learning theory. We illustrate our framework through simulation studies and two real-world applications using Zika virus outbreak data and traffic safety data.

stat.ME↗

Proximal Causal Inference for Conditional Separable Effects

Scientists regularly pose questions about treatment effects on outcomes conditional on a post-treatment event. However, causal inference in such settings requires care, even in perfectly executed randomized experiments. Recently, the conditional separable effect (CSE) was proposed as an interventionist estimand that corresponds to scientifically meaningful questions in these settings. However, existing results for the CSE require no unmeasured confounding between the outcome and post-treatment event, an assumption frequently violated in practice. In this work, we address this concern by developing new identification and estimation results for the CSE that allow for unmeasured confounding. We establish nonparametric identification of the CSE in observational and experimental settings with time-varying confounders, provided that certain proxy variables for hidden common causes of the post-treatment event and outcome are available. For inference, we characterize an influence function for the CSE under a semiparametric model where nuisance functions are a priori unrestricted. Using modern machine learning methods, we construct nonparametric nuisance function estimators and establish convergence rates that improve upon existing results. Moreover, we develop a consistent, asymptotically linear, and locally semiparametric efficient estimator of the CSE. We illustrate our framework with simulation studies and a real-world cancer therapy trial.

stat.ME↗

Nonparametric Inference with an Instrumental Variable under a Separable Binary Treatment Choice Model

Instrumental variable (IV) methods are widely used to infer treatment effects in the presence of unmeasured confounding. In this paper, we study nonparametric inference with an IV under a separable binary treatment choice model, which posits that the odds of the probability of taking the treatment, conditional on the instrument and the treatment-free potential outcome, factor into separable components for each variable. While nonparametric identification of smooth functionals of the treatment-free potential outcome among the treated, such as the average treatment effect on the treated, has been established under this model, corresponding nonparametric efficient estimation has proven elusive due to variationally dependent nuisance parameters defined in terms of counterfactual quantities. To address this challenge, we introduce a new variationally independent parameterization based on nuisance functions defined directly from the observed data. This parameterization, coupled with a novel fixed-point argument, enables the use of modern machine learning methods for nuisance function estimation. We characterize the semiparametric efficiency bound for any smooth functional of the treatment-free potential outcome among the treated and construct a corresponding semiparametric efficient estimator without imposing any unnecessary restriction on nuisance functions. Furthermore, we describe a straightforward generative model justifying our identifying assumptions and characterize empirically falsifiable implications of the framework to evaluate our assumptions in practical settings. Our approach seamlessly extends to nonlinear treatment effects, population-level effects, and nonignorable missing data settings. We illustrate our methods through simulation studies and an application to the Job Corps study.

stat.ME↗

Finding Distributions that Differ, with False Discovery Rate Control

We consider the problem of comparing a reference distribution with several other distributions. Given a sample from both the reference and the comparison groups, we aim to identify the comparison groups whose distributions differ from that of the reference group. Viewing this as a multiple testing problem, we introduce a methodology that provides exact, distribution-free control of the false discovery rate. To do so, we introduce the concept of batch conformal p-values and demonstrate that they satisfy positive regression dependence across the groups [Benjamini and Yekutieli, 2001], thereby enabling control of the false discovery rate through the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure. The proof of positive regression dependence introduces a novel technique for the inductive construction of rank vectors with almost sure dominance under exchangeability. We evaluate the performance of the proposed procedure through simulations, where, despite being distribution-free, in some cases they show performance comparable to methods with knowledge of the data-generating normal distribution; and further have more power than direct approaches based on conformal out-of-distribution detection. Further, we illustrate our methods on a Hepatitis C treatment dataset, where they can identify patient groups with large treatment effects; and on the Current Population Survey dataset, where they can identify sub-population with long work hours.

stat.ME↗

Combining Experimental and Observational Data for Identification and Estimation of Long-Term Causal Effects

We study identifying and estimating the causal effect of a treatment variable on a long-term outcome using data from an observational and an experimental domain. The observational data are subject to unobserved confounding. Furthermore, subjects in the experiment are only followed for a short period; thus, long-term effects are unobserved, though short-term effects are available. Consequently, neither data source alone suffices for causal inference on the long-term outcome, necessitating a principled fusion of the two. We propose three approaches for data fusion for the purpose of identifying and estimating the causal effect. The first assumes equal confounding bias for short-term and long-term outcomes. The second weakens this assumption by leveraging an observed confounder for which the short-term and long-term potential outcomes share the same partial additive association with this confounder. The third approach employs proxy variables of the latent confounder of the treatment-outcome relationship, extending the proximal causal inference framework to the data fusion setting. For each approach, we develop influence function-based estimators and analyze their robustness properties. We illustrate our methods by estimating the effect of class size on 8th-grade SAT scores using data from the Project STAR experiment combined with observational data from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study.

stat.ME↗

Quasi Instrumental Variable Methods for Stable Hidden Confounding and Binary Outcome

Instrumental variable (IV) methods are central to causal inference from observational data, particularly when a randomized experiment is not feasible. However, of the three conventional core IV identification conditions, only one, IV relevance, is empirically verifiable; often one or both of the other conditions, exclusion restriction and IV independence from unmeasured confounders, are unmet in real-world applications. These challenges are compounded when the outcome is binary, a setting for which robust IV methods remain underdeveloped. A fundamental contribution of this paper is the development of a general identification strategy justified under a structural equilibrium dynamic generative model of so-called stable confounding and a quasi instrumental variable (QIV), i.e. a variable that is only assumed to be predictive of the outcome. Such a model implies (a) stability of confounding on the multiplicative scale, and (b) stability of the additive average treatment effect among the treated (ATT), across levels of that QIV. The former is all that is necessary to ensure a valid test of the causal null hypothesis; together those two conditions establish nonparametric identification and estimation of the conditional and marginal ATT. To address the statistical challenges posed by the need for boundedness in binary outcomes, we introduce a generalized odds product re-parametrization of the observed data distribution, and we develop both a principled maximum likelihood estimator and a triply robust semiparametric locally efficient estimator, which we evaluate through simulations and an empirical application to the UK Biobank.

stat.ME↗

Conditional Predictive Inference for Missing Outcomes

We study the problem of conditional predictive inference on multiple outcomes missing at random (MAR) -- or equivalently, under covariate shift. While the weighted conformal prediction offers a tool for inference under covariate shift with a marginal coverage guarantee, procedures with conditional coverage guarantees are often desired in many applications to ensure reliable inference for a specific group of individuals. A standard approach to overcoming the fundamental limitation of distribution-free conditional predictive inference is to relax the target and instead aim to control coverage conditional on a local area, subset, or bin in the feature space. However, when the missingness pattern depends on the features, this relaxation remains challenging due to the violation of the MAR assumption with respect to the bins. To address this issue, we propose a propensity score $ε$-discretization, a carefully designed binning strategy based on the propensity score, which enables valid conditional inference. Based on this strategy, we develop a procedure -- termed pro-CP -- that enables simultaneous conditional predictive inference for multiple missing outcomes. We show that pro-CP controls the bin-conditional coverage rate in a distribution-free manner when the propensity score is either known exactly or estimated with sufficient accuracy. Furthermore, we provide a theoretical bound on the coverage rate when the propensity score is unknown and must be estimated. Notably, the error bound remains constant and depends only on the estimation quality, not on the sample size or the number of outcomes under consideration. In extensive empirical experiments on simulated data and on a job search intervention dataset, we illustrate that our procedures provide informative prediction sets with valid conditional coverage.

stat.ME↗

Adaptive Proximal Causal Inference with Some Invalid Proxies

Proximal causal inference (PCI) is a recently proposed framework to identify and estimate the causal effect of an exposure on an outcome in the presence of hidden confounders, using observed proxies. Specifically, PCI relies on two types of proxies: a treatment-inducing confounding proxy, related to the outcome only through its association with unmeasured confounders (given treatment and covariates), and an outcome-inducing confounding proxy, related to the treatment only through such association (given covariates). These proxies must satisfy stringent exclusion restrictions - namely, the treatment proxy must not affect the outcome, and the outcome proxy must not be affected by the treatment. To improve identification and potentially efficiency, multiple proxies are often used, raising concerns about bias from exclusion violations. To address this, we introduce necessary and sufficient conditions for identifying causal effects in the presence of many proxies, some potentially invalid. Under a canonical proximal linear structural equations model, we propose a LASSO-based median estimator that jointly selects valid proxies and estimates the causal effect, with theoretical guarantees. Recognizing LASSO's limitations in consistently selecting valid treatment proxies, we develop an adaptive LASSO-based estimator with differential penalization. We show that it is root-n consistent and yields valid confidence intervals when a valid outcome proxy is available. We also extend the approach to settings with many potentially invalid outcome proxies. Theoretical results are supported by simulations and an application assessing the effect of right heart catheterization on 30-day survival in ICU patient.

stat.ME↗

Batch Predictive Inference

Constructing prediction sets with coverage guarantees for unobserved outcomes is a core problem in modern statistics. Methods for predictive inference have been developed for a wide range of settings, but usually only consider test data points one at a time. Here we study the problem of distribution-free predictive inference for a batch of multiple test points, aiming to construct prediction sets for functions -- such as the mean or median -- of any number of unobserved test datapoints. This setting includes constructing simultaneous prediction sets with a high probability of coverage, and selecting datapoints satisfying a specified condition while controlling the number of false claims. For the general task of predictive inference on a function of a batch of test points, we introduce a methodology called batch predictive inference (batch PI), and provide a distribution-free coverage guarantee under exchangeability of the calibration and test data. Batch PI requires the quantiles of a rank ordering function defined on certain subsets of ranks. While computing these quantiles is NP-hard in general, we show that it can be done efficiently in many cases of interest, most notably for batch score functions with a compositional structure -- which includes examples of interest such as the mean -- via a dynamic programming algorithm that we develop. Batch PI has advantages over naive approaches (such as partitioning the calibration data or directly extending conformal prediction) in many settings, as it can deliver informative prediction sets even using small calibration sample sizes. We illustrate that our procedures provide informative inference across the use cases mentioned above, through experiments on both simulated data and a drug-target interaction dataset.

stat.ME↗

Test-negative designs with various reasons for testing: statistical bias and solution

Test-negative designs are widely used for post-market evaluation of vaccine effectiveness, particularly in cases when randomized trials are not feasible. Differing from classical test-negative designs where only healthcare-seekers with symptoms are included, recent test-negative designs have involved individuals with various reasons for testing, especially in an outbreak setting. While including these data can increase sample size and hence improve precision, concerns have been raised about whether they introduce bias into the current framework of test-negative designs, thereby demanding a formal statistical examination of this modified design. In this article, using statistical derivations, causal graphs, and numerical demonstrations, we show that the standard odds ratio estimator may be biased if various reasons for testing are not accounted for. To eliminate this bias, we identify three categories of reasons for testing, including symptoms, mandatory screening, and case contact tracing, and characterize associated statistical properties and estimands. Based on our characterization, we show how to consistently estimate each estimand via stratification. Furthermore, we describe when these estimands correspond to the same vaccine effectiveness parameter, and, when appropriate, propose a stratified estimator that can incorporate multiple reasons for testing and improve precision. The performance of our proposed method is demonstrated through simulation studies.

stat.ME↗

Single Proxy Synthetic Control

Synthetic control methods are widely used to estimate the treatment effect on a single treated unit in time-series settings. A common approach to estimate synthetic control weights is to regress the treated unit's pre-treatment outcome and covariates' time series measurements on those of untreated units via ordinary least squares. However, this approach can perform poorly if the pre-treatment fit is not near perfect, whether the weights are normalized or not. In this paper, we introduce a single proxy synthetic control approach, which views the outcomes of untreated units as proxies of the treatment-free potential outcome of the treated unit, a perspective we leverage to construct a valid synthetic control. Under this framework, we establish an alternative identification strategy and corresponding estimation methods for synthetic controls and the treatment effect on the treated unit. Notably, unlike existing proximal synthetic control methods, which require two types of proxies for identification, ours relies on a single type of proxy, thus facilitating its practical relevance. Additionally, we adapt a conformal inference approach to perform inference about the treatment effect, obviating the need for a large number of post-treatment observations. Lastly, our framework can accommodate time-varying covariates and nonlinear models. We demonstrate the proposed approach in a simulation study and a real-world application.

stat.ME↗

On Identification of Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes with Proxies of Hidden Confounders

We consider identification of optimal dynamic treatment regimes in a setting where time-varying treatments are confounded by hidden time-varying confounders, but proxy variables of the unmeasured confounders are available. We show that, with two independent proxy variables at each time point that are sufficiently relevant for the hidden confounders, identification of the joint distribution of counterfactuals is possible, thereby facilitating identification of an optimal treatment regime.

stat.ME↗