arXiv subjects

Erich Fischer

Publications and source records attributed to Erich Fischer.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Statistical Noise and Missing Forcing Limit Estimates of Earth's Feedback from Prescribed Sea-Surface Temperature Simulations

Earth's feedback parameter measures how the Earth system responds to forcing and is inversely proportional to climate sensitivity. Sea-surface temperature (SST) patterns can modulate the value of the feedback parameter. Differences between observed and simulated SSTs have raised the question how the observed SSTs evolution impacts the global feedback. The standard method for estimating this effect uses observed SSTs prescribed to an atmospheric model with fixed pre-industrial atmospheric forcing. This method makes two assumptions: first, that the observed SSTs capture all relevant effects from the forcing, so that prescribing a time-varying forcing is unnecessary; second, that the temporal variations in the feedback parameter are driven by the evolving SST pattern and can be estimated via moving-window regressions. We test these assumptions by running controlled experiments in which SSTs from fully-coupled historical simulations are prescribed to an atmospheric model. We find that the prescribed-SST experiments fail to capture the coupled feedback evolution. This is explained by two effects: First, the absence of prescribed atmospheric forcing, and second, statistical noise arising from the computation of moving-window regressions. We find no evidence of any significant relationship between evolving SST patterns and changes in the feedback time series in a 4000-year pre-industrial control simulation. Any trends in the feedback parameter detected on timescales shorter than ~100 years are indistinguishable from statistical noise, making their attribution to the evolving SST pattern extremely difficult. Our results imply that prescribed SST simulations offer limited potential for inferring temporal changes in Earth's parameter over the observational period.

physics.ao-ph↗

arXiv2026

Evaluating local climate in global storm-resolving models with the K\"oppen-Geiger classification

Global storm-resolving models aspire to become digital twins of the Earth, delivering information at the local scale at which humans experience climate. We evaluated how well two such models, ICON and IFS-FESOM, reproduce the climate as classified by the K\"oppen-Geiger system, using 30-year (2020-2049) simulations from the nextGEMS project at 9~km global resolution under SSP3-7.0 scenario. Both models capture the global distribution of the five main climate categories, encouraging given the infancy of storm-resolving climate modelling. Substantial regional biases nonetheless remain. Both underestimate tropical rainforest (Af) extent due to insufficient dry-month precipitation in Amazonia and equatorial Africa. ICON almost eliminates hot arid desert (BWh) across Australia through excessive precipitation, while IFS-FESOM reproduces it well. The two models show opposing biases along the temperate--continental boundary: IFS-FESOM winters are too cold in western Europe, ICON winters too warm. Substituting observed temperature or precipitation into the model fields reveals that precipitation errors dominate misclassification, while temperature biases play a secondary role confined to mid-latitude climate zone boundaries. Under climate change, the two models and CMIP6 projections agree on the direction of climate zone shifts: expansion of tropical savanna and hot desert at the expense of subarctic, tundra, and ice cap zones. However, inter-model differences in present-day climate exceed the 30-year climate change signal for many zones, calling for caution in regional projections and adaptation planning. Our results expose where local-scale climate representation still falls short of the digital twin ambition, while confirming that storm-resolving models already perform well across many regions. We propose K\"oppen-Geiger classification as a standard diagnostic to help track further progress.

physics.ao-ph↗

arXiv2025

Climate change impacts on net load under technological uncertainty in European power systems

Renewable energy sources play a major role in future net-zero energy systems. However, achieving energy system resilience remains challenging, since renewables depend on weather fluctuations, and future energy systems are subject to major design uncertainty. Existing literature mostly treats these types of uncertainty separately. Therefore, the assessment of uncertainties surrounding climate change and energy system design, and particularly their interactions, is insufficiently understood. To close this gap, we evaluate net load to assess energy system stress without relying on perfect foresight, while maintaining temporal and spatial correlations of the climate system. Net load is calculated from hourly historical and future climate model data translated to energy variables. To scope the extent of plausible energy systems, we consider eight different design scenarios inspired by the European Ten-Year Network Development Plan (TYNDP) and different levels of transmission expansion. We find that climate change impacts on net load are highly sensitive to the energy system design, implying that energy systems can be designed so that they are either hindered or helped by climate change. Furthermore, within a system scenario, climate change can change the frequency and seasonality of high net load events and their technological and meteorological composition. Wind-dominated systems with currently electrified heating levels, for instance, feature a 30% increase of high net load events under climate change, mostly in summer and fall, while fully electrified net zero systems are impacted by high net load events in winter and spring, which decrease by 50% with climate change. Our work thus calls for a wider perspective on energy-climate stress that captures the non-linear interactions of climate change and system design uncertainty, thereby overcoming the current focus on cold Dunkelflauten.

physics.soc-ph↗

arXiv2025

CLINB: A Climate Intelligence Benchmark for Foundational Models

Evaluating how Large Language Models (LLMs) handle complex, specialized knowledge remains a critical challenge. We address this through the lens of climate change by introducing CLINB, a benchmark that assesses models on open-ended, grounded, multimodal question answering tasks with clear requirements for knowledge quality and evidential support. CLINB relies on a dataset of real users' questions and evaluation rubrics curated by leading climate scientists. We implement and validate a model-based evaluation process and evaluate several frontier models. Our findings reveal a critical dichotomy. Frontier models demonstrate remarkable knowledge synthesis capabilities, often exhibiting PhD-level understanding and presentation quality. They outperform "hybrid" answers curated by domain experts assisted by weaker models. However, this performance is countered by failures in grounding. The quality of evidence varies, with substantial hallucination rates for references and images. We argue that bridging this gap between knowledge synthesis and verifiable attribution is essential for the deployment of AI in scientific workflows and that reliable, interpretable benchmarks like CLINB are needed to progress towards building trustworthy AI systems.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2025

Numerical models outperform AI weather forecasts of record-breaking extremes

Artificial intelligence (AI)-based models are revolutionizing weather forecasting and have surpassed leading numerical weather prediction systems on various benchmark tasks. However, their ability to extrapolate and reliably forecast unprecedented extreme events remains unclear. Here, we show that for record-breaking weather extremes, the numerical model High RESolution forecast (HRES) from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts still consistently outperforms state-of-the-art AI models GraphCast, GraphCast operational, Pangu-Weather, Pangu-Weather operational, and Fuxi. We demonstrate that forecast errors in AI models are consistently larger for record-breaking heat, cold, and wind than in HRES across nearly all lead times. We further find that the examined AI models tend to underestimate both the frequency and intensity of record-breaking events, and they underpredict hot records and overestimate cold records with growing errors for larger record exceedance. Our findings underscore the current limitations of AI weather models in extrapolating beyond their training domain and in forecasting the potentially most impactful record-breaking weather events that are particularly frequent in a rapidly warming climate. Further rigorous verification and model development is needed before these models can be solely relied upon for high-stakes applications such as early warning systems and disaster management.

physics.ao-ph↗

arXiv2025

Climate2Energy: a framework to consistently include climate change into energy system modeling

Supply and demand in future energy systems depend on the weather. We therefore need to quantify how climate change and variability impact energy systems. Here, we present Climate2Energy (C2E), a framework to consistently convert climate model outputs into energy system model inputs, covering all relevant types of renewable generation and demand for heating and cooling. C2E performs bias correction, uses established open-source tools where possible, and provides outputs tailored to energy system models. Moreover, C2E introduces a new hydropower model based on river discharge. We analyze dedicated hourly CESM2 Climate Model Simulations under the SSP3-7.0 scenario in Europe, covering climate variability through multiple realizations. We find large reductions in heating demand (-10% to -50%) and Southern European hydropower potentials (-10% to -40%) and increases in cooling demand (>100%). Based on stochastic optimizations with AnyMOD, we confirm that energy systems are highly sensitive to climate conditions, particularly on the demand side.

physics.soc-ph↗