SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Erik Ela

Publications and source records attributed to Erik Ela.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Source-Agnostic Sizing of Flexibility Reserves

Growing shares of variable renewable energy sources (VRES) increase forecast uncertainty and variability, requiring flexibility reserves that adapt to changing operating conditions and reflect the likelihood and severity of forecast deviations. Conventional fixed-rule or Gaussian approaches misrepresent asymmetric, heavy-tailed errors, leading to inefficient procurement or optimistic risk estimates. This paper presents a source-agnostic framework that constructs conditional error distributions for load, wind, and solar from historical deviations or probabilistic forecasts, combines them into a conditional net-load error distribution, and derives upward and downward reserves using coverage- and risk-based criteria. Nonparametric density estimation captures empirical error behavior without a parametric assumption, while a Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR)-based metric quantifies expected uncovered deviations. Experiments on a New York Independent System Operator (NYISO)-based synthetic dataset show that the framework meets target coverage with lower reserve volumes than static benchmarks and avoids the tail-risk distortion of Gaussian-based methods. Because reserves are built directly from the resource uncertainty distributions, the framework is transparent and interpretable, and it integrates seamlessly into existing production-cost models as deterministic reserve constraints, avoiding scenario-based stochastic optimization. It is implemented in the Electric Power Research Institute's (EPRI) DynADOR tool for operational reserve scheduling.

eess.SY

Flexible Ramping Product Procurement in Day-Ahead Markets

Flexible ramping products (FRPs) emerge as a promising instrument for addressing steep and uncertain ramping needs through market mechanisms. Initial implementations of FRPs in North American electricity markets, however, revealed several shortcomings in existing FRP designs. In many instances, FRP prices failed to signal the true value of ramping capacity, most notably evident in zero FRP prices observed in a myriad of periods during which the system was in acute need for rampable capacity. These periods were marked by scheduled but undeliverable FRPs, often calling for operator out-of-market actions. On top of that, the methods used for procuring FRPs have been primarily rule-based, lacking explicit economic underpinnings. In this paper, we put forth an alternative framework for FRP procurement, which seeks to set FRP requirements and schedule FRP awards such that the expected system operation cost is minimized. Using real world data from U.S. ISOs, we showcase the relative merits of the framework in (i) reducing the total system operation cost, (ii) improving price formation, (iii) enhancing the the deliverability of FRP awards, and (iv) reducing the need for out-of-market actions.

eess.SY

Flexible Ramping Product Procurement in Day-Ahead Markets

This article puts forward a methodology for procuring flexible ramping products (FRPs) in the day-ahead market (DAM). The proposed methodology comprises two market passes, the first of which employs a stochastic unit commitment (SUC) model that explicitly evaluates the uncertainty and the intra-hourly and inter-hourly variability of net load so as to minimize the expected total operating cost. The second pass clears the DAM while imposing FRP requirements. The cornerstone of our work is to set the FRP requirements at levels that drive the DAM decisions toward the optimal SUC decisions. Our methodology provides an economic underpinning for the stipulated FRP requirements, and it brings forth DAM awards that reduce the costs toward the expected total cost under SUC, while conforming to the chief DAM design principles. By preemptively considering the dispatch costs before awarding FRPs, it can further avert unexpectedly high costs that could result with the deployment of procured FRPs. We conduct numerical studies and lay out the relative merits of the proposed methodology vis-à-vis selected benchmarks based on various evaluation metrics.

math.OC