arXiv subjects

Eshta Bhardwaj

Publications and source records attributed to Eshta Bhardwaj.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Humour as Resistance: Visceralizing the Environmental and Social Impact of AI through Humour-based Creative Practices

The growth of AI does not come without cost. While we hear about the economic costs, the environmental and social costs are often obfuscated by mainstream narratives, and even when acknowledged, are accompanied by a sense of helplessness. To counter this, we, a group of designers and researchers, reflect on our experience leading a humour-based creative campaign surfacing the material impact of AI infrastructures. Through graphics design, physical installations, digital content creation and co-creation workshops, we leaned into humour as a creative practice to provoke collective reflection. Drawing on event ethnography, surveys and interviews with campaign engagers, we examine four roles of humour-based creative work in HCI: a connector to critical friends, a visceral and emotional harbour, social glue, and resistance to power. We argue for the importance of creative practices in bridging social and emotional gaps between people and concerns around technology, and in surfacing hidden perspectives for more inclusive conversations.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

Plateau That Never Comes: When Efficiency Claims in Datacenters and AI Become Greenwashing

Datacenter expansion under generative AI is increasingly framed as compatible with sustainability because of efficiency gains, cleaner electricity procurement, and improved facility design. Yet these claims often do not show that absolute electricity, water, material, waste, and community-facing burdens are falling. This Perspective addresses that evidentiary gap. Rather than asking whether efficiency gains are real, we ask when such gains are being enlarged into claims of system-wide sustainability to justify continued expansion. We develop a rebound-informed diagnostic framework for evaluating AI and datacenter sustainability narratives across five tests: metric, boundary, reinvestment, burden shifting, and governance. Applied to major AI industry sustainability reporting, the framework shows that firms largely justify continued expansion through efficiency improvements and clean-energy procurement, rather than by demonstrating reductions in absolute resource use. Applied to plateau claims in the literature, we show that many claims establish local or relative improvements while leaving energy rebound, lifecycle burdens, and enforceable limits unresolved. We argue that these sustainable-growth narratives begin to function as greenwashing when they use efficiency improvements to claim sustainability even as absolute energy, water, material, and public health burdens continue to increase. We conclude by positioning digital sufficiency as a burden-of-proof framework for governance: those advocating further datacenter expansion must show that it reduces, rather than merely redistributes or defers, absolute burdens across the full system.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2026

Evaluating Structured Documentation as a Tool for Reflexivity in Dataset Development

It is prominently recognized that dataset development in machine learning is a value-laden process from problem formulation to data processing, use, and reuse. Structured documentation frameworks such as datasheets, data statements, and dataset nutrition labels have been created to aid developers in documenting how their datasets were produced and, according to the creators of the frameworks, to facilitate reflexivity in dataset development. While reflexivity is a stated goal, it is unclear whether and to what extent these structured dataset documentation frameworks incorporate concepts from reflexivity literature (at FAccT and elsewhere) and whether the use of the frameworks demonstrates reflexivity. Here, we adopt mixed-method thematic analysis and corpus-assisted discourse analysis to explore how reflexivity is incorporated in structured documentation frameworks and their responses. We demonstrate empirically that there is a general lack of engagement with major themes of reflexivity in both dataset documentation frameworks and published applications of these frameworks. We present a codebook of major reflexivity topics, recommend actionable strategies, and propose a set of extended datasheet questions to more effectively incorporate these topics into structured documentation frameworks and in the FAccT literature.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2025

Exploring the Viability of the Updated World3 Model for Examining the Impact of Computing on Planetary Boundaries

The influential Limits to Growth report introduced a system dynamics-based model to demonstrate global dynamics of the world's population, industry, natural resources, agriculture, and pollution between 1900-2100. In current times, the rapidly expanding trajectory of data center development, much of it linked to AI, uses increasing amounts of natural resources. The extraordinary amount of resources claimed warrants the question of how computing trajectories contribute to exceeding planetary boundaries. Based on the general robustness of the World3-03 model and its influence in serving as a foundation for current climate frameworks, we explore whether the model is a viable method to quantitatively simulate the impact of data centers on limits to growth. Our paper explores whether the World3-03 model is a feasible method for reflecting on these dynamics by adding new variables to the model in order to simulate a new AI-augmented scenario. We find that through our addition of AI-related variables (such as increasing data center development) impacting pollution in the World3-03 model, we can observe the expected changes to dynamics, demonstrating the viability of the World3-03 model for examining AI's impact on planetary boundaries. We detail future research opportunities for using the World3-03 model to explore the relationships between increasing resource-intensive computing and the resulting impacts to the environment in a quantitative way given its feasibility.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2025

Limits at a Distance: Design Directions to Address Psychological Distance in Policy Decisions Affecting Planetary Boundaries

Policy decisions relevant to the environment rely on tools like dashboards, risk models, and prediction models to provide information and data visualizations that enable decision-makers to make trade-offs. The conventional paradigm of data visualization practices for policy and decision-making is to convey data in a supposedly neutral, objective manner for rational decision-makers. Feminist critique advocates for nuanced and reflexive approaches that take into account situated decision-makers and their affective relationships to data. This paper sheds light on a key cognitive aspect that impacts how decision-makers interpret data. Because all outcomes from policies relevant to climate change occur at a distance, decision-makers experience so-called `psychological distance' to environmental decisions in terms of space, time, social identity, and hypotheticality. This profoundly impacts how they perceive and evaluate outcomes. Since policy decisions to achieve a safe planetary space are urgently needed for immediate transition and change, we need a design practice that takes into account how psychological distance affects cognition and decision-making. Our paper explores the role of alternative design approaches in developing visualizations used for climate policymaking. We conduct a literature review and synthesis which bridges psychological distance with speculative design and data visceralization by illustrating the value of affective design methods via examples from previous research. Through this work, we propose a novel premise for the communication and visualization of environmental data. Our paper lays out how future research on the impacts of alternative design approaches on psychological distance can make data used for policy decisions more tangible and visceral.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2025

Limits to AI Growth: The Ecological and Social Consequences of Scaling

The accelerating development and deployment of AI technologies depend on the continued ability to scale their infrastructure. This has implied increasing amounts of monetary investment and natural resources. Frontier AI applications have thus resulted in rising financial, environmental, and social costs. While the factors that AI scaling depends on reach its limits, the push for its accelerated advancement and entrenchment continues. In this paper, we provide a holistic review of AI scaling using four lenses (technical, economic, ecological, and social) and review the relationships between these lenses to explore the dynamics of AI growth. We do so by drawing on system dynamics concepts including archetypes such as "limits to growth" to model the dynamic complexity of AI scaling and synthesize several perspectives. Our work maps out the entangled relationships between the technical, economic, ecological and social perspectives and the apparent limits to growth. The analysis explains how industry's responses to external limits enables continued (but temporary) scaling and how this benefits Big Tech while externalizing social and environmental damages. To avoid an "overshoot and collapse" trajectory, we advocate for realigning priorities and norms around scaling to prioritize sustainable and mindful advancements.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2025

The State of Data Curation at NeurIPS: An Assessment of Dataset Development Practices in the Datasets and Benchmarks Track

Data curation is a field with origins in librarianship and archives, whose scholarship and thinking on data issues go back centuries, if not millennia. The field of machine learning is increasingly observing the importance of data curation to the advancement of both applications and fundamental understanding of machine learning models - evidenced not least by the creation of the Datasets and Benchmarks track itself. This work provides an analysis of dataset development practices at NeurIPS through the lens of data curation. We present an evaluation framework for dataset documentation, consisting of a rubric and toolkit developed through a literature review of data curation principles. We use the framework to assess the strengths and weaknesses in current dataset development practices of 60 datasets published in the NeurIPS Datasets and Benchmarks track from 2021-2023. We summarize key findings and trends. Results indicate greater need for documentation about environmental footprint, ethical considerations, and data management. We suggest targeted strategies and resources to improve documentation in these areas and provide recommendations for the NeurIPS peer-review process that prioritize rigorous data curation in ML. Finally, we provide results in the format of a dataset that showcases aspects of recommended data curation practices. Our rubric and results are of interest for improving data curation practices broadly in the field of ML as well as to data curation and science and technology studies scholars studying practices in ML. Our aim is to support continued improvement in interdisciplinary research on dataset practices, ultimately improving the reusability and reproducibility of new datasets and benchmarks, enabling standardized and informed human oversight, and strengthening the foundation of rigorous and responsible ML research.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2024

Machine Learning Data Practices through a Data Curation Lens: An Evaluation Framework

Studies of dataset development in machine learning call for greater attention to the data practices that make model development possible and shape its outcomes. Many argue that the adoption of theory and practices from archives and data curation fields can support greater fairness, accountability, transparency, and more ethical machine learning. In response, this paper examines data practices in machine learning dataset development through the lens of data curation. We evaluate data practices in machine learning as data curation practices. To do so, we develop a framework for evaluating machine learning datasets using data curation concepts and principles through a rubric. Through a mixed-methods analysis of evaluation results for 25 ML datasets, we study the feasibility of data curation principles to be adopted for machine learning data work in practice and explore how data curation is currently performed. We find that researchers in machine learning, which often emphasizes model development, struggle to apply standard data curation principles. Our findings illustrate difficulties at the intersection of these fields, such as evaluating dimensions that have shared terms in both fields but non-shared meanings, a high degree of interpretative flexibility in adapting concepts without prescriptive restrictions, obstacles in limiting the depth of data curation expertise needed to apply the rubric, and challenges in scoping the extent of documentation dataset creators are responsible for. We propose ways to address these challenges and develop an overall framework for evaluation that outlines how data curation concepts and methods can inform machine learning data practices.

cs.CY↗