arXiv subjects

Ethan Ratliff-Crain

Publications and source records attributed to Ethan Ratliff-Crain.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Testing replication for an agent-based model of market fragmentation and latency arbitrage

This study strengthens the foundations of multi-venue market modeling by attempting an independent replication of Wah and Wellman's 2016 model of latency arbitrage in a fragmented market. We find that faithful replication is hindered by missing implementation details in the original paper and limited quantitative reporting. We demonstrate that increasing the number of simulation runs beyond the original design allows for the creation of bootstrap confidence intervals to support rigorous tests of quantitative alignment, compensating for lacking distributional information (e.g. variance). We also demonstrate that increased complexity across the modeled scenarios corresponds with increased difficulty aligning to the original results. We draw on a codebase released by the original authors in connection with a later paper to recover additional implementation details; however, we reject quantitative alignment between that codebase and the published results. Combining information from the paper and the released code, we achieve relational equivalence for most metrics but reject quantitative alignment for model settings where latency is non-zero. We show that many of the qualitative takeaways from the original paper on the effects of market fragmentation and latency arbitrage are sensitive to the specifics of a `greedy strategy' extension given to the zero-intelligence (ZI) trader agents. Under an alternative interpretation of this strategy, we find that market fragmentation decreases execution times in all experiments and increases trader welfare in most experiments. Finally, to facilitate future replication, critique, and extension, we provide an ODD (Overview, Design concepts, Details) protocol for our implementations of the model.

q-fin.TR↗

arXiv2024

Revisiting Cont's Stylized Facts for Modern Stock Markets

In 2001, Rama Cont introduced a now-widely used set of 'stylized facts' to synthesize empirical studies of financial price changes (returns), resulting in 11 statistical properties common to a large set of assets and markets. These properties are viewed as constraints a model should be able to reproduce in order to accurately represent returns in a market. It has not been established whether the characteristics Cont noted in 2001 still hold for modern markets following significant regulatory shifts and technological advances. It is also not clear whether a given time series of financial returns for an asset will express all 11 stylized facts. We test both of these propositions by attempting to replicate each of Cont's 11 stylized facts for intraday returns of the individual stocks in the Dow 30, using the same authoritative data as that used by the U.S. regulator from October 2018 - March 2019. We find conclusive evidence for eight of Cont's original facts and no support for the remaining three. Our study represents the first test of Cont's 11 stylized facts against a consistent set of stocks, therefore providing insight into how these stylized facts should be viewed in the context of modern stock markets.

q-fin.ST↗

arXiv2023

Adaptive Agents and Data Quality in Agent-Based Financial Markets

We present our Agent-Based Market Microstructure Simulation (ABMMS), an Agent-Based Financial Market (ABFM) that captures much of the complexity present in the US National Market System for equities (NMS). Agent-Based models are a natural choice for understanding financial markets. Financial markets feature a constrained action space that should simplify model creation, produce a wealth of data that should aid model validation, and a successful ABFM could strongly impact system design and policy development processes. Despite these advantages, ABFMs have largely remained an academic novelty. We hypothesize that two factors limit the usefulness of ABFMs. First, many ABFMs fail to capture relevant microstructure mechanisms, leading to differences in the mechanics of trading. Second, the simple agents that commonly populate ABFMs do not display the breadth of behaviors observed in human traders or the trading systems that they create. We investigate these issues through the development of ABMMS, which features a fragmented market structure, communication infrastructure with propagation delays, realistic auction mechanisms, and more. As a baseline, we populate ABMMS with simple trading agents and investigate properties of the generated data. We then compare the baseline with experimental conditions that explore the impacts of market topology or meta-reinforcement learning agents. The combination of detailed market mechanisms and adaptive agents leads to models whose generated data more accurately reproduce stylized facts observed in actual markets. These improvements increase the utility of ABFMs as tools to inform design and policy decisions.

q-fin.TR↗

arXiv2014

Irreducibles and primes in computable integral domains

A computable ring is a ring equipped with mechanical procedure to add and multiply elements. In most natural computable integral domains, there is a computational procedure to determine if a given element is prime/irreducible. However, there do exist computable UFDs (in fact, polynomial rings over computable fields) where the set of prime/irreducible elements is not computable. Outside of the class of UFDs, the notions of irreducible and prime may not coincide. We demonstrate how different these concepts can be by constructing computable integral domains where the set of irreducible elements is computable while the set of prime elements is not, and vice versa. Along the way, we will generalize Kronecker's method for computing irreducibles and factorizations in $\mathbb{Z}[x]$.

math.LO↗