arXiv subjects

Etienne Labbé

Publications and source records attributed to Etienne Labbé.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Audio-JEPA: Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture for Audio Representation Learning

Building on the Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture (JEPA) paradigm, a recent self-supervised learning framework that predicts latent representations of masked regions in high-level feature spaces, we propose Audio-JEPA (Audio Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture), tailored specifically for audio data. Audio-JEPA uses a simple Vision Transformer backbone to predict latent representations of masked spectrogram patches rather than reconstructing raw audio. We pre-train on unlabeled AudioSet clips (10s, 32kHz) with random patch masking on mel-spectrograms. We evaluate on the X-ARES suite covering speech, music, and environmental sound tasks. Although our implementation is a straightforward translation of the original model to audio, the results still show comparable performance to wav2vec 2.0 and data2vec while using less than one-fifth of their training data and with no hyper-parameter tuning. All code and pretrained checkpoints are available on GitHub.

cs.SD↗

arXiv2026

BEST-RQ-2: Contextualize-Then-Predict, a Two-Step Approach for Self-Supervised Audio Representations

Self-supervised learning enables audio representations that transfer across domains and tasks. We present BEST-RQ-2, an evolution of BEST-RQ that retains frozen randomprojection-based discrete targets while introducing a two-step contextualize-then-predict pretraining scheme. A ViT context encoder processes only the unmasked spectrogram regions, and a lightweight predictor infers targets for the masked regions; the predictor is discarded after pretraining. Replacing the original Conformer encoder with a ViT shifts performance across domains, slightly reducing speech performance while improving music and environmental sounds, with comparable average scores. The main improvement comes from decomposing masked prediction into separate contextualization and prediction stages. On the X-ARES and XARES-LLM benchmarks, BEST-RQ-2 consistently outperforms one-stage baselines in overall transfer while keeping inference compute unchanged. Code and model checkpoints are publicly available.

cs.SD↗

arXiv2025

Hierarchical Label Propagation: A Model-Size-Dependent Performance Booster for AudioSet Tagging

AudioSet is one of the most used and largest datasets in audio tagging, containing about 2 million audio samples that are manually labeled with 527 event categories organized into an ontology. However, the annotations contain inconsistencies, particularly where categories that should be labeled as positive according to the ontology are frequently mislabeled as negative. To address this issue, we apply Hierarchical Label Propagation (HLP), which propagates labels up the ontology hierarchy, resulting in a mean increase in positive labels per audio clip from 1.98 to 2.39 and affecting 109 out of the 527 classes. Our results demonstrate that HLP provides performance benefits across various model architectures, including convolutional neural networks (PANN's CNN6 and ConvNeXT) and transformers (PaSST), with smaller models showing more improvements. Finally, on FSD50K, another widely used dataset, models trained on AudioSet with HLP consistently outperformed those trained without HLP. Our source code will be made available on GitHub.

cs.SD↗

arXiv2023

Killing two birds with one stone: Can an audio captioning system also be used for audio-text retrieval?

Automated Audio Captioning (AAC) aims to develop systems capable of describing an audio recording using a textual sentence. In contrast, Audio-Text Retrieval (ATR) systems seek to find the best matching audio recording(s) for a given textual query (Text-to-Audio) or vice versa (Audio-to-Text). These tasks require different types of systems: AAC employs a sequence-to-sequence model, while ATR utilizes a ranking model that compares audio and text representations within a shared projection subspace. However, this work investigates the relationship between AAC and ATR by exploring the ATR capabilities of an unmodified AAC system, without fine-tuning for the new task. Our AAC system consists of an audio encoder (ConvNeXt-Tiny) trained on AudioSet for audio tagging, and a transformer decoder responsible for generating sentences. For AAC, it achieves a high SPIDEr-FL score of 0.298 on Clotho and 0.472 on AudioCaps on average. For ATR, we propose using the standard Cross-Entropy loss values obtained for any audio/caption pair. Experimental results on the Clotho and AudioCaps datasets demonstrate decent recall values using this simple approach. For instance, we obtained a Text-to-Audio R@1 value of 0.382 for Au-dioCaps, which is above the current state-of-the-art method without external data. Interestingly, we observe that normalizing the loss values was necessary for Audio-to-Text retrieval.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2023

Adapting a ConvNeXt model to audio classification on AudioSet

In computer vision, convolutional neural networks (CNN) such as ConvNeXt, have been able to surpass state-of-the-art transformers, partly thanks to depthwise separable convolutions (DSC). DSC, as an approximation of the regular convolution, has made CNNs more efficient in time and memory complexity without deteriorating their accuracy, and sometimes even improving it. In this paper, we first implement DSC into the Pretrained Audio Neural Networks (PANN) family for audio classification on AudioSet, to show its benefits in terms of accuracy/model size trade-off. Second, we adapt the now famous ConvNeXt model to the same task. It rapidly overfits, so we report on techniques that improve the learning process. Our best ConvNeXt model reached 0.471 mean-average precision on AudioSet, which is better than or equivalent to recent large audio transformers, while using three times less parameters. We also achieved positive results in audio captioning and audio retrieval with this model. Our PyTorch source code and checkpoint models are available at https://github.com/topel/audioset-convnext-inf.

cs.SD↗

arXiv2023

Multitask learning in Audio Captioning: a sentence embedding regression loss acts as a regularizer

In this work, we propose to study the performance of a model trained with a sentence embedding regression loss component for the Automated Audio Captioning task. This task aims to build systems that can describe audio content with a single sentence written in natural language. Most systems are trained with the standard Cross-Entropy loss, which does not take into account the semantic closeness of the sentence. We found that adding a sentence embedding loss term reduces overfitting, but also increased SPIDEr from 0.397 to 0.418 in our first setting on the AudioCaps corpus. When we increased the weight decay value, we found our model to be much closer to the current state-of-the-art methods, with a SPIDEr score up to 0.444 compared to a 0.475 score. Moreover, this model uses eight times less trainable parameters. In this training setting, the sentence embedding loss has no more impact on the model performance.

cs.SD↗

arXiv2023

Comparison of semi-supervised deep learning algorithms for audio classification

In this article, we adapted five recent SSL methods to the task of audio classification. The first two methods, namely Deep Co-Training (DCT) and Mean Teacher (MT), involve two collaborative neural networks. The three other algorithms, called MixMatch (MM), ReMixMatch (RMM), and FixMatch (FM), are single-model methods that rely primarily on data augmentation strategies. Using the Wide-ResNet-28-2 architecture in all our experiments, 10% of labeled data and the remaining 90% as unlabeled data for training, we first compare the error rates of the five methods on three standard benchmark audio datasets: Environmental Sound Classification (ESC-10), UrbanSound8K (UBS8K), and Google Speech Commands (GSC). In all but one cases, MM, RMM, and FM outperformed MT and DCT significantly, MM and RMM being the best methods in most experiments. On UBS8K and GSC, MM achieved 18.02% and 3.25% error rate (ER), respectively, outperforming models trained with 100% of the available labeled data, which reached 23.29% and 4.94%, respectively. RMM achieved the best results on ESC-10 (12.00% ER), followed by FM which reached 13.33%. Second, we explored adding the mixup augmentation, used in MM and RMM, to DCT, MT, and FM. In almost all cases, mixup brought consistent gains. For instance, on GSC, FM reached 4.44% and 3.31% ER without and with mixup. Our PyTorch code will be made available upon paper acceptance at https:// github. com/ Labbe ti/ SSLH.

cs.SD↗

arXiv2022

Is my automatic audio captioning system so bad? spider-max: a metric to consider several caption candidates

Automatic Audio Captioning (AAC) is the task that aims to describe an audio signal using natural language. AAC systems take as input an audio signal and output a free-form text sentence, called a caption. Evaluating such systems is not trivial, since there are many ways to express the same idea. For this reason, several complementary metrics, such as BLEU, CIDEr, SPICE and SPIDEr, are used to compare a single automatic caption to one or several captions of reference, produced by a human annotator. Nevertheless, an automatic system can produce several caption candidates, either using some randomness in the sentence generation process, or by considering the various competing hypothesized captions during decoding with beam-search, for instance. If we consider an end-user of an AAC system, presenting several captions instead of a single one seems relevant to provide some diversity, similarly to information retrieval systems. In this work, we explore the possibility to consider several predicted captions in the evaluation process instead of one. For this purpose, we propose SPIDEr-max, a metric that takes the maximum SPIDEr value among the scores of several caption candidates. To advocate for our metric, we report experiments on Clotho v2.1 and AudioCaps, with a transformed-based system. On AudioCaps for example, this system reached a SPIDEr-max value (with 5 candidates) close to the SPIDEr human score of reference.

cs.SD↗