Eugene T. Y. Ang | Searcharxiv

arXiv2025

Evaluating Policy Effects through Opinion Dynamics and Network Sampling

In the process of enacting or introducing a new policy, policymakers frequently consider the population's responses. These considerations are critical for effective governance. There are numerous methods to gauge the ground sentiment from a subset of the population; examples include surveys or listening to various feedback channels. Many conventional approaches implicitly assume that opinions are static; however, in reality, the population will discuss and debate these new policies among themselves, and reform new opinions in the process. In this paper, we pose the following questions: Can we quantify the effect of these social dynamics on the broader opinion towards a new policy? Given some information about the relationship network that underlies the population, how does overall opinion change post-discussion? We investigate three different settings in which the policy is revealed: respondents who do not know each other, groups of respondents who all know each other, and respondents chosen randomly. By controlling who the policy is revealed to, we control the degree of discussion among the population. We quantify how these factors affect the changes in policy beliefs via the Wasserstein distance between the empirically observed data post-discussion and its distribution pre-discussion. We also provide several numerical analyses based on generated network and real-life network datasets. Our work aims to address the challenges associated with network topology and social interactions, and provide policymakers with a quantitative lens to assess policy effectiveness in the face of resource constraints and network complexities.

cs.SI↗

arXiv2021

An Interpretable Intensive Care Unit Mortality Risk Calculator

Mortality risk is a major concern to patients have just been discharged from the intensive care unit (ICU). Many studies have been directed to construct machine learning models to predict such risk. Although these models are highly accurate, they are less amenable to interpretation and clinicians are typically unable to gain further insights into the patients' health conditions and the underlying factors that influence their mortality risk. In this paper, we use patients' profiles extracted from the MIMIC-III clinical database to construct risk calculators based on different machine learning techniques such as logistic regression, decision trees, random forests and multilayer perceptrons. We perform an extensive benchmarking study that compares the most salient features as predicted by various methods. We observe a high degree of agreement across the considered machine learning methods; in particular, the cardiac surgery recovery unit, age, and blood urea nitrogen levels are commonly predicted to be the most salient features for determining patients' mortality risks. Our work has the potential for clinicians to interpret risk predictions.

stat.AP↗