SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Evan C. Johnson

Publications and source records attributed to Evan C. Johnson.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

Negligible effects of environmental fluctuations on the maintenance of coral biodiversity: A test of five storage effects

The storage effect is a general explanation for ecological coexistence, wherein different species specialize on different states of a fluctuating environment, e.g., hot vs. cold years. Despite the storage effect's prominence in theoretical ecology, we lack evidence on whether it maintains biodiversity in nature. Here, we examine five storage effects in a community of 11 coral species from the Great Barrier Reef, using detailed size-structured demographic data collected over five years. We parameterize integral projection models, simulate coral communities, and quantify coexistence mechanisms through Modern Coexistence Theory. Results show that storage effects promote coexistence but are weak compared to fitness differences. Despite coral communities exhibiting theoretical prerequisites for strong temporal niche partitioning, the storage effect plays only a minor role in maintaining coral biodiversity. This aligns with growing evidence that storage effects are weak across ecosystems. Coral coexistence likely depends more on spatial processes, including microhabitat partitioning and asymmetric dispersal.

q-bio.PE

Biological barriers to forest pest invasions: A novel host tree slows mountain pine beetle range expansion

Following widespread outbreaks across western North America, mountain pine beetle recently expanded its range from British Columbia into Alberta. However, mountain pine beetle's eastward expansion across Canada has stalled unexpectedly, defying predictions of rapid spread through jack pine, a novel host tree. This study investigates the underlying causes of this deceleration using an integrative approach combining statistical modeling, simulations, and experimental data. We find that the slow spread is primarily due to mountain pine beetle's difficulty in finding and successfully attacking jack pine trees, rather than issues with reproduction or larval development. The underlying mechanism impeding beetle range expansion has been hypothesized to be lower pine volumes in eastern forests, which are primarily a consequence of lower stem density. However, our analysis suggests that jack pine's phenotype itself is the primary impediment. We propose that jack pine's smaller size, thinner phloem, and lower monoterpene concentrations result in weaker chemical cues during the host-finding and mass-attack stages of MPB's life cycle, ultimately leading to fewer successful attacks. These findings suggest a reduced risk of further eastward spread, but should be interpreted cautiously due to enormous policy implications and the inherent limitations of ecological forecasting.

q-bio.PE

An assessment of Alberta's strategy for controlling mountain pine beetle outbreaks

The Canadian province of Alberta spent over 500 million dollars on controlling mountain pine beetle populations, but did it work? Using a statistical modeling framework coupled with long-term field data, we examined how direct control measures, severe winters, and host-tree depletion shaped the trajectory of Alberta's mountain pine beetle outbreak between 2009 and 2020. Simulations suggest that control efforts reduced total tree mortality by 79% (95% predictive interval: 58--89%) and prevented 1.8 (0.91--4.1) trees per hectare from being killed from 2010--2020. Although cold winters had little effect on overall damage, they acted synergistically with control to end the outbreak, causing population collapse circa 2020. This synergy supports a "wait it out" strategy of mountain pine beetle management, where moderate control effort is applied until an extreme weather event delivers the final blow. Any effects of host-tree depletion via beetle attack were negligible. From an economic perspective, removing one infestation tree -- at an approximate cost of 320 CAD -- prevented the loss of roughly six (2.6--15) trees, demonstrating the potential for long-term cost-effectiveness. Our results further indicate that future outbreaks may vary widely in severity due to environmental stochasticity, with potential damage in a no-control scenario ranging from 0.41 to 9.7 trees per hectare killed (over a hypothetical 11-year period). An alternative model predicts an even wider range of outcomes: 1--40 trees per hectare. These findings highlight not only the potential of sustained control efforts in mitigating forest pest outbreaks, but also the inherent uncertainty in long-term ecological forecasting.

q-bio.PE

Weak signals, strong debates: Density dependence and population regulation through the lens of model uncertainty

Ecologists have long argued about the strength of density dependence and population regulation, respectively defined as the short-term and long-term rates of return to equilibrium. Here, I give three arguments for the intractability of population regulation. First, the ecological literature flip-flops on the strength of evidence for population regulation; by simple induction, population regulation should remain uncertain. Second, there is an analogous debate in economics about whether shocks to Gross Domestic Product have transient or permanent effects. This literature is extensive and sophisticated, yet there is no consensus, implying that more research will not resolve the issue in ecology. Third, using a variety of time series models and the Global Population Dynamics Database, I show that one's conclusions about population regulation are almost entirely dependent on model structure. This insurmountable model uncertainty explains why the strength of regulation is unresolved despite decades of research. However, it is possible to achieve the more modest goal of estimating density dependence. I introduce a novel measure of density dependence -- the effective autoregressive parameter -- which is conceptually intuitive and easy to calculate with simulations. The strength of density dependence varies significantly across populations, with an average that can be characterized as moderate: perturbations have an average half-life of 3 years. Rather than a universal balance of nature, stability varies widely across populations in ways that correlate with life history and taxonomy.

q-bio.PE

Explaining excitable population dynamics in bark beetles: From life history to large, episodic outbreaks

Bark beetles are significant forest pests, with some species capable of causing widespread tree mortality. Among these, the mountain pine beetle (MPB) stands out for its exceptionally destructive outbreak in the 2000s. We use MPB as a case study to explore the concept of =excitable dynamics, where ephemeral perturbations produce large excursions from equilibrium. Our empirically-calibrated model of reveals five features of MPB biology: stand density-dependent dispersal, an Allee effect, time-scale separation between beetle and tree life cycles, tree size-dependent fecundity, and a large-tree preference. The first three features explain MPB's characteristic boom-bust dynamics, while the latter two explain outbreak magnitude. Other bark beetles lack one or more of these traits, partially explaining their generally lower impact. However, predicting bark beetle impact requires consideration of both life history and landscape factors: total damage increases linearly with host-tree biomass, but this relationship holds only for irruptive (i.e., excitable) beetle species. We distill our findings into a minimal mechanistic model that captures the essence of irruptive bark beetle dynamics. This model firmly establishes MPB as one of the first empirical examples of excitable dynamics in ecology.

q-bio.PE

Negative density-dependent dispersal of the mountain pine beetle in Alberta

Understanding the mountain pine beetle's dispersal patterns is critical for evaluating its threat to Canada's boreal forests. It is generally believed that higher beetle densities lead to increased long-distance dispersal due to aggregation pheromones becoming repellent at high densities, causing beetles to seek areas with less competition. However, using helicopter surveys of infested trees, along with statistical models, we find no evidence supporting a positive relationship. Instead, we observe a weak negative association between population density and dispersal at all spatial scales. A possible explanation is that at low population densities, beetles cannot successfully attack healthy trees and must travel farther to find weakened hosts. Even so, the influence of beetle density on dispersal is minor compared to the spatiotemporal variation in the overall (density-independent) scale of dispersal, as revealed by our models. This variation accounts for the MPB's erratic range expansion across western Alberta, which varied from 20 km to 220 km annually.

q-bio.PE

Determinism vs. stochasticity in competitive flour beetle communities

As ecologists increasingly adopt stochastic models over deterministic ones, the question arises: when is this a positive development and when is this an unnecessary complication? While deterministic models -- like the Lotka-Volterra model -- provide straightforward predictions about competitive outcomes, they are often unrealistic. Stochastic models are more realistic, but their complexity can limit their usefulness in explaining coexistence. Here, we investigate the relative importance of deterministic and stochastic processes in competition between two flour beetle species, Tribolium castaneum and Tribolium confusum. Specifically, we use highly-replicated one-generation experiments (784 microcosms) to parameterize a mechanistic model. Both the full stochastic model and the underlying deterministic skeleton exhibit priority effects, where one species excludes the other, but the identity of the winning species depends on initial abundances. Stochasticity makes the identity of the winner less predictable, but deterministic dynamics still make reliable predictions (94% accuracy across a range of reasonable initial abundances). We conclude that deterministic population dynamics are sufficient to account for patterns of coexistence (or lack thereof), a potentially general finding that is supported by recent field studies. Additionally, we resolve longstanding issues in flour beetle research by identifying selective egg predation as the mechanism for priority effects, demonstrating the primacy of demographic stochasticity (compared to environmental stochasticity), and reinterpreting classic competition experiments to show that apparent coexistence often represents long-term transient dynamics.

q-bio.PE

Stratified dispersal explains mountain pine beetle's range expansion in Alberta

The mountain pine beetle (MPB), a destructive pest native to Western North America, has recently extended its range into Alberta, Canada. Predicting the dispersal of MPB is challenging due to their small size and complex dispersal behavior. Because of these challenges, estimates of MPB's typical dispersal distances have varied widely, ranging from 10 meters to 18 kilometers. Here, we use high-quality data from helicopter and field-crew surveys to parameterize a large number of dispersal kernels. We find that fat-tailed kernels -- those which allow for a small number of long-distance dispersal events -- consistently provide the best fit to the data. Specifically, the radially-symmetric Student's t-distribution with parameters ν = 0.012 and ρ = 1.45 stands out as parsimonious and user-friendly; this model predicts a median dispersal distance of 60 meters, but with the 95th percentile of dispersers travelling nearly 5 kilometers. The best-fitting mathematical models have biological interpretations. The Student's t-distribution, derivable as a mixture of diffusive processes with varying settling times, is consistent with observations that most beetles fly short distances while few travel far; early-emerging beetles fly farther; and larger beetles from larger trees exhibit greater variance in flight distance. Finally, we explain why other studies have found such a wide variation in the length scale in MPB dispersal, and we demonstrate that long-distance dispersal events are critical for modelling MPB range expansion.

q-bio.PE

The storage effect is not about bet-hedging or population stage-structure

The storage effect is a well-known explanation for coexistence in temporally varying environments. Like many complex ecological theories, the storage effect is often used as an explanation for observed coexistence on the basis of heuristic understanding, rather than careful application of a detailed model. One interpretation states that species coexist by specializing on specific environmental states, and therefore must have a robust life-stage (e.g., long-lived adults, a seed-bank) in order to "wait it out" for favorable conditions. Here we show that this widely employed interpretation can be misleading. Multiple models show that stage-structure, long lifespans, and overlapping generations are neither necessary nor sufficient for the storage effect. In models where a robust life-stage does engender a storage effect, it does not do so by preventing stochastic extinction or by improving relative bet-hedging. A robust life-stage is best understood as one of many ways to fulfill an abstract condition for the storage effect: an interaction effect of environment and competition on per capita growth rates. Using a dataset of annual plants from a Mediterranean grassland in Spain, we show that such interaction effects occur between water availability and the number of germinant competitors, leading to storage in the absence of a persistent seed bank. Empiricists hoping to uncover the storage effect should look for interaction effects between environmental conditions and competition -- easily identifiable with multiple regression -- at all stages of a species' life-cycle.

q-bio.PE