SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Farideh Oloomi

Publications and source records attributed to Farideh Oloomi.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Response of the competitive balance model to the external field

The competitive balance model was proposed as an extension of the structural balance theory, aiming to account for heterogeneities observed in real-world networks. In this model, different paradigms lead to form different friendship and enmity. As an example, friendship or enmity between countries can have a political or religious basis. The suggested Hamiltonian is symmetrical between paradigms. Our analyses show that a balanced state can be achieved if just one paradigm prevails in the network and the paradigm shift is possible only by imposing an external field. In this paper, we investigate the influence of the external field on the evolution of the network. We drive the mean-field solutions of the model and verify the accuracy of our analytical solutions by performing Monte-Carlo simulations. We observe that the external field breaks the symmetry of the system. The response of the system to this external field, contingent upon temperature, can be either paramagnetic or ferromagnetic. We observed a hysteresis behavior in the ferromagnetic regime. Once communities are formed based on a certain paradigm, then they resist change. We found that to avoid wasting energy we need to know the level of stochastic behavior in the network. Analogous to magnetic systems, we observe that susceptibility adheres to Curie's law.

physics.soc-ph

Competitive Balance Theory: Modeling conflict of interest in a heterogeneous network

The dynamics of networks on Heider balance theory moves toward reducing the tension by constantly reevaluating the interactions to achieve a state of balance. Conflict of interest, however, is inherent in most complex systems; frequently, there are multiple ideals or states of balance, and moving towards one could work against another. In this paper, by introducing the competitive balance theory, we study the evolution of balance in the presence of conflicts of interest. In our model, the assumption is that different states of balance compete in the evolution process to dominate the system. We ask, whether, through these interactions, different states of balance compete to prevail their own ideals or a set of co-existing ideals in a balanced condition is a possible outcome. The results show that although there is a symmetry in the type of balance, the system either evolves towards a symmetry breaking where one of the states of balance dominates the system, or, less frequently, the competing states of balance co exist in a jammed state.

physics.soc-ph