Favio Di Ciocco | Searcharxiv

arXiv2026

Weaker Coherence, Weaker Reciprocity: Comparing the Semantic and Social Organization of Moltbook and Reddit

Large language models enable the creation of autonomous agents that interact in social environments, raising the question of whether agent-based platforms reproduce the organizational properties of human social networks. We compare Moltbook, a social network populated by AI agents, with early Reddit, focusing on how communities organize and differentiate semantic content, using network analysis and NLP methods to characterize semantic coherence and diversity within and between communities, and their relationship to user activity. We find a systematic difference between the two platforms. Reddit communities show stronger semantic coherence, closer alignment with community names, and greater semantic diversity, with individual communities spanning broader content and communities more differentiated from one another. This combination distinguishes Reddit from Moltbook, whose communities are more homogeneous, less differentiated, and increasingly misaligned with their names over time. Users on Reddit also participate across communities that are more semantically related than those connected by activity in Moltbook. At the interaction level, comment-network motif analysis shows Moltbook dominated by non-reciprocal, broadcast-like exchanges, whereas Reddit shows more reciprocal, chained interaction patterns. These results indicate that Reddit combines semantic coherence with diversity across organizational levels, a pattern not reproduced by the AI-agent network.

cs.SI↗

arXiv2025

Ideological polarization in static networks: A multidimensional approach for opinion alignment

Polarization, defined as the emergence of sharply divided groups with opposing and often extreme views, is an increasingly prominent feature of modern societies. While many studies analyze this phenomenon in the context of single issues, such as public opinion on abortion or immigration, this approach overlooks that political and social attitudes rarely develop in isolation. Instead, many issues are interconnected, shaped by overarching ideological frameworks that guide interpretations and position-taking across multiple topics. These frameworks produce coherent yet polarized worldviews that reinforce group boundaries. In this work, we propose and study a multi-topic opinion dynamics model that captures these interdependencies. Each issue is represented as a separate dimension in a shared opinion space, allowing us to model not only attitudes toward individual topics but also the structure of ideological alignment across them. A central feature is topic correlation, which enables us to explore how polarization emerges when opinions on one issue influence attitudes on others. The model also incorporates homophily, a mechanism where individuals are more likely to interact with those similar to themselves. We analyze the asymptotic behavior of the model by identifying its most relevant fixed points, supported by theoretical analysis and numerical simulations. We then examine how the multidimensional opinion space shapes the emergence and stability of polarization, and apply the model to empirical data from the American National Election Studies, interpreting observed opinion patterns within our framework.

physics.soc-ph↗