Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Fedor Karpelevitch

Publications and source records attributed to Fedor Karpelevitch.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Aigner's majorization conjecture in quantitative group testing: counterexamples and eventual sufficiency for star forests

We refute Aigner's majorization conjecture for star forests in adaptive quantitative group testing with two defective items. Each test counts the defectives in a chosen subset; the possible defective pairs form the edges of a star forest. Aigner's necessary majorization condition is sufficient through five tests but is not sufficient at any budget from six onward. Nevertheless, for every fixed number of stars, it becomes sufficient once the test budget is large enough. We prove that majorization is sufficient for all forests with at most twenty-nine stars, and that this bound is sharp. We also construct counterexamples that pass arbitrarily many successive compatibility checks based on majorization. The five-test converse, counterexamples, eventual sufficiency theorem and unbounded-delay construction have analytic proofs. The sharp finite support bounds also use exact integer-inequality certificates.

math.CO↗

Quantitative group testing with a fixed shore: sharp asymptotics and exact formulas

We study adaptive quantitative group testing with one defective item in each of two disjoint sets. When one set has fixed size, we determine the leading term of the difference between the binary bound and the largest searchable opposite set size. The result extends to fixed unions of complete bipartite graphs and to positive weighted sums of the opposite set sizes. We determine exact eventual formulas when the fixed set has six, seven or eight items. The eight-item formula has a period-three correction. We explain this correction by optimizing the sizes of shared test pieces within fixed decision-tree prefixes. For each fixed finite family of such prefixes ending in star forests, the optimal deficit is eventually a rational polynomial plus a bounded periodic function. The asymptotic proofs are analytic; the exact formulas also use integer constructions and rational exclusion certificates.

math.CO↗

Certified exact bounds for adaptive quantitative group testing with two defectives

We determine the maximum population size for which exactly two defective items can always be identified using at most $k$ adaptive quantitative tests, for every $0\le k\le10$. Each test reports the number of defectives in a chosen subset. The exact maxima for eight, nine and ten tests are 65, 112 and 192, respectively. We also classify all pairs of sizes of two disjoint sets, each containing exactly one defective, that can be resolved within each test budget through eight. These exact results are supported by explicit strategies and maximality certificates checked by programs separate from the search implementation. Additional results include partial nine-test boundaries and an eleven-test strategy for 328 items; maximality of the latter remains open.

math.CO↗