arXiv subjects

Fedor V. Fomin

Publications and source records attributed to Fedor V. Fomin.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

arXiv2025

Tight Approximation and Kernelization Bounds for Vertex-Disjoint Shortest Paths

We examine the possibility of approximating Maximum Vertex-Disjoint Shortest Paths. In this problem, the input is an edge-weighted (directed or undirected) $n$-vertex graph $G$ along with $k$ terminal pairs $(s_1,t_1),(s_2,t_2),\ldots,(s_k,t_k)$. The task is to connect as many terminal pairs as possible by pairwise vertex-disjoint paths such that each path is a shortest path between the respective terminals. Our work is anchored in the recent breakthrough by Lochet [SODA '21], which demonstrates the polynomial-time solvability of the problem for a fixed value of $k$. Lochet's result implies the existence of a polynomial-time $ck$-approximation for Maximum Vertex-Disjoint Shortest Paths, where $c \leq 1$ is a constant. Our first result suggests that this approximation algorithm is, in a sense, the best we can hope for. More precisely, assuming the gap-ETH, we exclude the existence of an $o(k)$-approximations within $f(k)$poly($n$) time for any function $f$ that only depends on $k$. Our second result demonstrates the infeasibility of achieving an approximation ratio of $n^{\frac{1}{2}-\varepsilon}$ in polynomial time, unless P = NP. It is not difficult to show that a greedy algorithm selecting a path with the minimum number of arcs results in a $\sqrt{\ell}$-approximation, where $\ell$ is the number of edges in all the paths of an optimal solution. Since $\ell \leq n$, this underscores the tightness of the $n^{\frac{1}{2}-\varepsilon}$-inapproximability bound. Additionally, we establish that the problem can be solved in $2^{O(\ell)}$poly($n$) time, but does not admit a polynomial kernel in $\ell$. Moreover, it cannot be solved in $2^{o(\ell)}$poly($n$) time unless the ETH fails. Our hardness results hold for undirected graphs with unit weights, while our positive results extend to scenarios where the input graph is directed and features arbitrary (non-negative) edge weights.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

When Distances Lie: Euclidean Embeddings in the Presence of Outliers and Distance Violations

Distance geometry explores the properties of distance spaces that can be exactly represented as the pairwise Euclidean distances between points in $\mathbb{R}^d$ ($d \geq 1$), or equivalently, distance spaces that can be isometrically embedded in $\mathbb{R}^d$. In this work, we investigate whether a distance space can be isometrically embedded in $\mathbb{R}^d$ after applying a limited number of modifications. Specifically, we focus on two types of modifications: outlier deletion (removing points) and distance modification (adjusting distances between points). The central problem, Euclidean Embedding Editing (EEE), asks whether an input distance space on $n$ points can be transformed, using at most $k$ modifications, into a space that is isometrically embeddable in $\mathbb{R}^d$. We present several fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) and approximation algorithms for this problem. Our first result is an algorithm that solves EEE in time $(dk)^{\mathcal{O}(d+k)} + n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$. The core subroutine of this algorithm, which is of independent interest, is a polynomial-time method for compressing the input distance space into an equivalent instance of EEE with $\mathcal{O}((dk)^2)$ points. For the special but important case of EEE where only outlier deletions are allowed, we improve the parameter dependence of the FPT algorithm and obtain a running time of $\min\{(d+3)^k, 2^{d+k}\} \cdot n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$. Additionally, we provide an FPT-approximation algorithm for this problem, which outputs a set of at most $2 \cdot {\rm OPT}$ outliers in time $2^d \cdot n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$. This 2-approximation algorithm improves upon the previous $(3+\varepsilon)$-approximation algorithm by Sidiropoulos, Wang, and Wang [SODA '17]. Furthermore, we complement our algorithms with hardness results motivating our choice of parameterizations.

cs.CG↗

arXiv2025

Planar Network Diversion

Network Diversion is a graph problem that has been extensively studied in both the network-analysis and operations-research communities as a measure of how robust a network is against adversarial disruption. This problem is especially well motivated in transportation networks, which are often assumed to be planar. Motivated by this and recent theoretical advances for Network Diversion on planar input graphs, we develop a fast O(n log n) time algorithm and present a practical implementation of this algorithm that is able to solve instances with millions of vertices in a matter of seconds.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

Exponential-Time Approximation (Schemes) for Vertex-Ordering Problems

In this paper, we begin the exploration of vertex-ordering problems through the lens of exponential-time approximation algorithms. In particular, we ask the following question: Can we simultaneously beat the running times of the fastest known (exponential-time) exact algorithms and the best known approximation factors that can be achieved in polynomial time? Following the recent research initiated by Esmer et al. (ESA 2022, IPEC 2023, SODA 2024) on vertex-subset problems, and by Inamdar et al. (ITCS 2024) on graph-partitioning problems, we focus on vertex-ordering problems. In particular, we give positive results for Feedback Arc Set, Optimal Linear Arrangement, Cutwidth, and Pathwidth. Most of our algorithms build upon a novel ``balanced-cut'' approach, which is our main conceptual contribution. This allows us to solve various problems in very general settings allowing for directed and arc-weighted input graphs. Our main technical contribution is a (1+ε)-approximation for any ε > 0 for (weighted) Feedback Arc Set in O*((2-δ)^n) time, where δ > 0 is a constant only depending on ε.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

Multivariate Exploration of Metric Dilation

Let $G$ be a weighted graph embedded in a metric space $(M, d_M )$. The vertices of $G$ correspond to the points in $M$ , with the weight of each edge $uv$ being the distance $d_M (u, v)$ between their respective points in $M$ . The dilation (or stretch) of $G$ is defined as the minimum factor $t$ such that, for any pair of vertices $u, v$, the distance between $u$ and $v$-represented by the weight of a shortest $u$, $v$-path is at most $ t \cdot d_M (u, v)$. We study Dilation t-Augmentation, where the objective is, given a metric $M $, a graph $G$, and numerical values $k$ and $t$, to determine whether $G$ can be transformed into a graph with dilation $t$ by adding at most $k$ edges. Our primary focus is on the scenario where the metric $M$ is the shortest path metric of an unweighted graph $Γ$. Even in this specific case, Dilation $t$-Augmentation remains computationally challenging. In particular, the problem is W[2]-hard parameterized by $k$ when $Γ$ is a complete graph, already for $t=2$. Our main contribution lies in providing new insights into the impact of combinations of various parameters on the computational complexity of the problem. We establish the following. -- The parameterized dichotomy of the problem with respect to dilation $t$, when the graph $G$ is sparse: Parameterized by $k$, the problem is FPT for graphs excluding a biclique $K_{d,d}$ as a subgraph for $t\leq 2$ and the problem is W[1]-hard for $t\geq 3$ even if $G$ is a forest consisting of disjoint stars. -- The problem is FPT parameterized by the combined parameter $k+t+Δ$, where $Δ$ is the maximum degree of the graph $G$ or $Γ$.

cs.DM↗

arXiv2024

Parameterized Geometric Graph Modification with Disk Scaling

The parameterized analysis of graph modification problems represents the most extensively studied area within Parameterized Complexity. Given a graph $G$ and an integer $k\in\mathbb{N}$ as input, the goal is to determine whether we can perform at most $k$ operations on $G$ to transform it into a graph belonging to a specified graph class $\mathcal{F}$. Typical operations are combinatorial and include vertex deletions and edge deletions, insertions, and contractions. However, in many real-world scenarios, when the input graph is constrained to be a geometric intersection graph, the modification of the graph is influenced by changes in the geometric properties of the underlying objects themselves, rather than by combinatorial modifications. It raises the question of whether vertex deletions or adjacency modifications are necessarily the most appropriate modification operations for studying modifications of geometric graphs. We propose the study of the disk intersection graph modification through the scaling of disks. This operation is typical in the realm of topology control but has not yet been explored in the context of Parameterized Complexity. We design parameterized algorithms and kernels for modifying to the most basic graph classes: edgeless, connected, and acyclic. Our technical contributions encompass a novel combination of linear programming, branching, and kernelization techniques, along with a fresh application of bidimensionality theory to analyze the area covered by disks, which may have broader applicability.

cs.CG↗

arXiv2024

Packing Short Cycles

Cycle packing is a fundamental problem in optimization, graph theory, and algorithms. Motivated by recent advancements in finding vertex-disjoint paths between a specified set of vertices that either minimize the total length of the paths [Björklund, Husfeldt, ICALP 2014; Mari, Mukherjee, Pilipczuk, and Sankowski, SODA 2024] or request the paths to be shortest [Lochet, SODA 2021], we consider the following cycle packing problems: Min-Sum Cycle Packing and Shortest Cycle Packing. In Min-Sum Cycle Packing, we try to find, in a weighted undirected graph, $k$ vertex-disjoint cycles of minimum total weight. Our first main result is an algorithm that, for any fixed $k$, solves the problem in polynomial time. We complement this result by establishing the W[1]-hardness of Min-Sum Cycle Packing parameterized by $k$. The same results hold for the version of the problem where the task is to find $k$ edge-disjoint cycles. Our second main result concerns Shortest Cycle Packing, which is a special case of Min-Sum Cycle Packing that asks to find a packing of $k$ shortest cycles in a graph. We prove this problem to be fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) when parameterized by $k$ on weighted planar graphs. We also obtain a polynomial kernel for the edge-disjoint variant of the problem on planar graphs. Deciding whether Min-Sum Cycle Packing is FPT on planar graphs and whether Shortest Cycle Packing is FPT on general graphs remain challenging open questions.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

Fixed-Parameter Tractability of Hedge Cut

In the Hedge Cut problem, the edges of a graph are partitioned into groups called hedges, and the question is what is the minimum number of hedges to delete to disconnect the graph. Ghaffari, Karger, and Panigrahi [SODA 2017] showed that Hedge Cut can be solved in quasipolynomial-time, raising the hope for a polynomial time algorithm. Jaffke, Lima, Masarík, Pilipczuk, and Souza [SODA 2023] complemented this result by showing that assuming the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH), no polynomial-time algorithm exists. In this paper, we show that Hedge Cut is fixed-parameter tractable parameterized by the solution size $\ell$ by providing an algorithm with running time $\binom{O(\log n) + \ell}{\ell} \cdot m^{O(1)}$, which can be upper bounded by $c^{\ell} \cdot (n+m)^{O(1)}$ for any constant $c>1$. This running time captures at the same time the fact that the problem is quasipolynomial-time solvable, and that it is fixed-parameter tractable parameterized by $\ell$. We further generalize this algorithm to an algorithm with running time $\binom{O(k \log n) + \ell}{\ell} \cdot n^{O(k)} \cdot m^{O(1)}$ for Hedge $k$-Cut.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

The Parameterized Complexity Landscape of Two-Sets Cut-Uncut

In Two-Sets Cut-Uncut, we are given an undirected graph $G=(V,E)$ and two terminal sets $S$ and $T$. The task is to find a minimum cut $C$ in $G$ (if there is any) separating $S$ from $T$ under the following ``uncut'' condition. In the graph $(V,E \setminus C)$, the terminals in each terminal set remain in the same connected component. In spite of the superficial similarity to the classic problem Minimum $s$-$t$-Cut, Two-Sets Cut-Uncut is computationally challenging. In particular, even deciding whether such a cut of any size exists, is already NP-complete. We initiate a systematic study of Two-Sets Cut-Uncut within the context of parameterized complexity. By leveraging known relations between many well-studied graph parameters, we characterize the structural properties of input graphs that allow for polynomial kernels, fixed-parameter tractability (FPT), and slicewise polynomial algorithms (XP). Our main contribution is the near-complete establishment of the complexity of these algorithmic properties within the described hierarchy of graph parameters. On a technical level, our main results are fixed-parameter tractability for the (vertex-deletion) distance to cographs and an OR-cross composition excluding polynomial kernels for the vertex cover number of the input graph (under the standard complexity assumption NP is not contained in coNP/poly).

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

How to guide a present-biased agent through prescribed tasks?

The present bias is a well-documented behavioral trait that significantly influences human decision-making, with present-biased agents often prioritizing immediate rewards over long-term benefits, leading to suboptimal outcomes in various real-world scenarios. Kleinberg and Oren (2014) proposed a popular graph-theoretical model of inconsistent planning to capture the behavior of present-biased agents. In this model, a multi-step project is represented by a weighted directed acyclic task graph, where the agent traverses the graph based on present-biased preferences. We use the model of Kleinberg and Oren to address the principal-agent problem, where a principal, fully aware of the agent's present bias, aims to modify an existing project by adding or deleting tasks. The challenge is to create a modified project that satisfies two somewhat contradictory conditions. On one hand, the present-biased agent should select specific tasks deemed important by the principal. On the other hand, if the anticipated costs in the modified project become too high for the agent, there is a risk of the agent abandoning the entire project, which is not in the principal's interest. To tackle this issue, we leverage the tools of parameterized complexity to investigate whether the principal's strategy can be efficiently identified. We provide algorithms and complexity bounds for this problem.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2024

Hybrid k-Clustering: Blending k-Median and k-Center

We propose a novel clustering model encompassing two well-known clustering models: k-center clustering and k-median clustering. In the Hybrid k-Clusetring problem, given a set P of points in R^d, an integer k, and a non-negative real r, our objective is to position k closed balls of radius r to minimize the sum of distances from points not covered by the balls to their closest balls. Equivalently, we seek an optimal L_1-fitting of a union of k balls of radius r to a set of points in the Euclidean space. When r=0, this corresponds to k-median; when the minimum sum is zero, indicating complete coverage of all points, it is k-center. Our primary result is a bicriteria approximation algorithm that, for a given ε>0, produces a hybrid k-clustering with balls of radius (1+ε)r. This algorithm achieves a cost at most 1+εof the optimum, and it operates in time 2^{(kd/ε)^{O(1)}} n^{O(1)}. Notably, considering the established lower bounds on k-center and k-median, our bicriteria approximation stands as the best possible result for Hybrid k-Clusetring.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

Cuts in Graphs with Matroid Constraints

{\sc Vertex $(s, t)$-Cut} and {\sc Vertex Multiway Cut} are two fundamental graph separation problems in algorithmic graph theory. We study matroidal generalizations of these problems, where in addition to the usual input, we are given a representation $R \in \mathbb{F}^{r \times n}$ of a linear matroid $\mathcal{M} = (V(G), \mathcal{I})$ of rank $r$ in the input, and the goal is to determine whether there exists a vertex subset $S \subseteq V(G)$ that has the required cut properties, as well as is independent in the matroid $\mathcal{M}$. We refer to these problems as {\sc Independent Vertex $(s, t)$-cut}, and {\sc Independent Multiway Cut}, respectively. We show that these problems are fixed-parameter tractable ({\sf FPT}) when parameterized by the solution size (which can be assumed to be equal to the rank of the matroid $\mathcal{M}$). These results are obtained by exploiting the recent technique of flow augmentation [Kim et al.~STOC '22], combined with a dynamic programming algorithm on flow-paths á la [Feige and Mahdian,~STOC '06] that maintains a representative family of solutions w.r.t.~the given matroid [Marx, TCS '06; Fomin et al., JACM]. As a corollary, we also obtain {\sf FPT} algorithms for the independent version of {\sc Odd Cycle Transversal}. Further, our results can be generalized to other variants of the problems, e.g., weighted versions, or edge-deletion versions.

cs.DM↗

arXiv2024

Distributed Model Checking on Graphs of Bounded Treedepth

We establish that every monadic second-order logic (MSO) formula on graphs with bounded treedepth is decidable in a constant number of rounds within the CONGEST model. To our knowledge, this marks the first meta-theorem regarding distributed model-checking. Various optimization problems on graphs are expressible in MSO. Examples include determining whether a graph $G$ has a clique of size $k$, whether it admits a coloring with $k$ colors, whether it contains a graph $H$ as a subgraph or minor, or whether terminal vertices in $G$ could be connected via vertex-disjoint paths. Our meta-theorem significantly enhances the work of Bousquet et al. [PODC 2022], which was focused on distributed certification of MSO on graphs with bounded treedepth. Moreover, our results can be extended to solving optimization and counting problems expressible in MSO, in graphs of bounded treedepth.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

Algorithmic Extensions of Dirac's Theorem

In 1952, Dirac proved the following theorem about long cycles in graphs with large minimum vertex degrees: Every $n$-vertex $2$-connected graph $G$ with minimum vertex degree $δ\geq 2$ contains a cycle with at least $\min\{2δ,n\}$ vertices. In particular, if $δ\geq n/2$, then $G$ is Hamiltonian. The proof of Dirac's theorem is constructive, and it yields an algorithm computing the corresponding cycle in polynomial time. The combinatorial bound of Dirac's theorem is tight in the following sense. There are 2-connected graphs that do not contain cycles of length more than $2δ+1$. Also, there are non-Hamiltonian graphs with all vertices but one of degree at least $n/2$. This prompts naturally to the following algorithmic questions. For $k\geq 1$, (A) How difficult is to decide whether a 2-connected graph contains a cycle of length at least $\min\{2δ+k,n\}$? (B) How difficult is to decide whether a graph $G$ is Hamiltonian, when at least $n - k$ vertices of $G$ are of degrees at least $n/2-k$? The first question was asked by Fomin, Golovach, Lokshtanov, Panolan, Saurabh, and Zehavi. The second question is due to Jansen, Kozma, and Nederlof. Even for a very special case of $k=1$, the existence of a polynomial-time algorithm deciding whether $G$ contains a cycle of length at least $\min\{2δ+1,n\}$ was open. We resolve both questions by proving the following algorithmic generalization of Dirac's theorem: If all but $k$ vertices of a $2$-connected graph $G$ are of degree at least $δ$, then deciding whether $G$ has a cycle of length at least $\min\{2δ+k, n\}$ can be done in time $2^{\mathcal{O}(k)}\cdot n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$. The proof of the algorithmic generalization of Dirac's theorem builds on new graph-theoretical results that are interesting on their own.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

Stability in Graphs with Matroid Constraints

We study the following Independent Stable Set problem. Let G be an undirected graph and M = (V(G),I) be a matroid whose elements are the vertices of G. For an integer k\geq 1, the task is to decide whether G contains a set S\subseteq V(G) of size at least k which is independent (stable) in G and independent in M. This problem generalizes several well-studied algorithmic problems, including Rainbow Independent Set, Rainbow Matching, and Bipartite Matching with Separation. We show that - When the matroid M is represented by the independence oracle, then for any computable function f, no algorithm can solve Independent Stable Set using f(k)n^{o(k)} calls to the oracle. - On the other hand, when the graph G is of degeneracy d, then the problem is solvable in time O((d+1)^kn), and hence is FPT parameterized by d+k. Moreover, when the degeneracy d is a constant (which is not a part of the input), the problem admits a kernel polynomial in k. More precisely, we prove that for every integer d\geq 0, the problem admits a kernelization algorithm that in time n^{O(d)} outputs an equivalent framework with a graph on dk^{O(d)} vertices. A lower bound complements this when d is part of the input: Independent Stable Set does not admit a polynomial kernel when parameterized by k+d unless NP \subseteq coNP/poly. This lower bound holds even when M is a partition matroid. - Another set of results concerns the scenario when the graph G is chordal. In this case, our computational lower bound excludes an FPT algorithm when the input matroid is given by its independence oracle. However, we demonstrate that Independent Stable Set can be solved in 2^{O(k)}||M||^{O(1)} time when M is a linear matroid given by its representation. In the same setting, Independent Stable Set does not have a polynomial kernel when parameterized by k unless NP\subseteq coNP/poly.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

Structural perspective on constraint-based learning of Markov networks

Markov networks are probabilistic graphical models that employ undirected graphs to depict conditional independence relationships among variables. Our focus lies in constraint-based structure learning, which entails learning the undirected graph from data through the execution of conditional independence tests. We establish theoretical limits concerning two critical aspects of constraint-based learning of Markov networks: the number of tests and the sizes of the conditioning sets. These bounds uncover an exciting interplay between the structural properties of the graph and the amount of tests required to learn a Markov network. The starting point of our work is that the graph parameter maximum pairwise connectivity, $κ$, that is, the maximum number of vertex-disjoint paths connecting a pair of vertices in the graph, is responsible for the sizes of independence tests required to learn the graph. On one hand, we show that at least one test with the size of the conditioning set at least $κ$ is always necessary. On the other hand, we prove that any graph can be learned by performing tests of size at most $κ$. This completely resolves the question of the minimum size of conditioning sets required to learn the graph. When it comes to the number of tests, our upper bound on the sizes of conditioning sets implies that every $n$-vertex graph can be learned by at most $n^κ$ tests with conditioning sets of sizes at most $κ$. We show that for any upper bound $q$ on the sizes of the conditioning sets, there exist graphs with $O(n q)$ vertices that require at least $n^{Ω(κ)}$ tests to learn. This lower bound holds even when the treewidth and the maximum degree of the graph are at most $κ+2$. On the positive side, we prove that every graph of bounded treewidth can be learned by a polynomial number of tests with conditioning sets of sizes at most $2κ$.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2023

Tree Containment Above Minimum Degree is FPT

According to the classic Chv{á}tal's Lemma from 1977, a graph of minimum degree $δ(G)$ contains every tree on $δ(G)+1$ vertices. Our main result is the following algorithmic "extension" of Chvátal's Lemma: For any $n$-vertex graph $G$, integer $k$, and a tree $T$ on at most $δ(G)+k$ vertices, deciding whether $G$ contains a subgraph isomorphic to $T$, can be done in time $f(k)\cdot n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$ for some function $f$ of $k$ only. The proof of our main result is based on an interplay between extremal graph theory and parameterized algorithms.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2023

FPT Approximation and Subexponential Algorithms for Covering Few or Many Edges

We study the \textsc{$α$-Fixed Cardinality Graph Partitioning ($α$-FCGP)} problem, the generic local graph partitioning problem introduced by Bonnet et al. [Algorithmica 2015]. In this problem, we are given a graph $G$, two numbers $k,p$ and $0\leqα\leq 1$, the question is whether there is a set $S\subseteq V$ of size $k$ with a specified coverage function $cov_α(S)$ at least $p$ (or at most $p$ for the minimization version). The coverage function $cov_α(\cdot)$ counts edges with exactly one endpoint in $S$ with weight $α$ and edges with both endpoints in $S$ with weight $1 - α$. $α$-FCGP generalizes a number of fundamental graph problems such as \textsc{Densest $k$-Subgraph}, \textsc{Max $k$-Vertex Cover}, and \textsc{Max $(k,n-k)$-Cut}. A natural question in the study of $α$-FCGP is whether the algorithmic results known for its special cases, like \textsc{Max $k$-Vertex Cover}, could be extended to more general settings. One of the simple but powerful methods for obtaining parameterized approximation [Manurangsi, SOSA 2019] and subexponential algorithms [Fomin et al. IPL 2011] for \textsc{Max $k$-Vertex Cover} is based on the greedy vertex degree orderings. The main insight of our work is that the idea of greed vertex degree ordering could be used to design fixed-parameter approximation schemes (FPT-AS) for $α> 0$ and the subexponential-time algorithms for the problem on apex-minor free graphs for maximization with $α> 1/3$ and minimization with $α< 1/3$.

cs.DS↗