arXiv subjects

Felix Klingelhoefer

Publications and source records attributed to Felix Klingelhoefer.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Hardness and Approximation for Coloring Digraphs

The dichromatic number $\vec\chi(D)$ of a digraph is the minimum number $k$ such that $V(D)$ can be partitioned into $k$ subsets, each inducing an acyclic digraph. The acyclic number $\vec\alpha(D)$ is the cardinality of a largest induced acyclic subdigraph of $D$. We study these problems from an approximation point of view. We begin with establishing that even when restricted to tournaments, approximating $\vec\chi$ and $\vec\alpha$ remain as challenging as their undirected counterparts on general graphs. Specifically, we establish that for every $\epsilon >0$, it is hard to approximate both $\vec\alpha$ and $\vec\chi$ up to a factor of $n^{1-\epsilon}$ even when restricted to tournaments. We next consider approximate coloring of digraphs in special cases. We begin with establishing that we can color $\ell$-dicolorable digraphs using at most $\ell \cdot n^{1-\frac{1}{\ell}}$ colors in time $O(n^{2\ell})$; in particular, we can color $2$-dicolorable digraphs with $2\sqrt{n}$ colors in polynomial time. We then focus on bounding the dichromatic number of dense digraphs as a function of the independence number $\alpha$ of the underlying graph. We consider two special cases in this regard: digraphs with $\vec\chi(D)\leq 2$ and digraphs that do not contain any directed triangle. For these cases, we present algorithms which generalize and improve existing tools and results.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

Bounding the chromatic number of dense digraphs by arc neighborhoods

The chromatic number of a directed graph is the minimum number of induced acyclic subdigraphs that cover its vertex set, and accordingly, the chromatic number of a tournament is the minimum number of transitive subtournaments that cover its vertex set. The neighborhood of an arc $uv$ in a tournament $T$ is the set of vertices that form a directed triangle with arc $uv$. We show that if the neighborhood of every arc in a tournament has bounded chromatic number, then the whole tournament has bounded chromatic number. This holds more generally for oriented graphs with bounded independence number, and we extend our proof from tournaments to this class of dense digraphs. As an application, we prove the equivalence of a conjecture of El-Zahar and Erdős and a recent conjecture of Nguyen, Scott and Seymour relating the structure of graphs and tournaments with high chromatic number.

math.CO↗

arXiv2023

Coloring tournaments with few colors: Algorithms and complexity

A $k$-coloring of a tournament is a partition of its vertices into $k$ acyclic sets. Deciding if a tournament is 2-colorable is NP-hard. A natural problem, akin to that of coloring a 3-colorable graph with few colors, is to color a 2-colorable tournament with few colors. This problem does not seem to have been addressed before, although it is a special case of coloring a 2-colorable 3-uniform hypergraph with few colors, which is a well-studied problem with super-constant lower bounds. We present a new efficient decomposition lemma for tournaments, which we use to design polynomial-time algorithms to color various classes of tournaments with few colors, notably, to color a 2-colorable tournament with ten colors. We also use this lemma to prove equivalence between the problems of coloring 3-colorable tournaments and coloring 3-colorable graphs with constantly many colors. For the classes of tournaments considered, we complement our upper bounds with strengthened lower bounds, painting a comprehensive picture of the algorithmic and complexity aspects of coloring tournaments.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2022

Problems, proofs, and disproofs on the inversion number

The {\it inversion} of a set $X$ of vertices in a digraph $D$ consists in reversing the direction of all arcs of $D\langle X\rangle$. The {\it inversion number} of an oriented graph $D$, denoted by ${\rm inv}(D)$, is the minimum number of inversions needed to transform $D$ into an acyclic oriented graph. In this paper, we study a number of problems involving the inversion number of oriented graphs. Firstly, we give bounds on ${\rm inv}(n)$, the maximum of the inversion numbers of the oriented graphs of order $n$. We show $n - \mathcal{O}(\sqrt{n\log n}) \ \leq \ {\rm inv}(n) \ \leq \ n - \lceil \log (n+1) \rceil$. Secondly, we disprove a conjecture of Bang-Jensen et al. asserting that, for every pair of oriented graphs $L$ and $R$, we have ${\rm inv}(L\Rightarrow R) ={\rm inv}(L) + {\rm inv}(R)$, where $L\Rightarrow R$ is the oriented graph obtained from the disjoint union of $L$ and $R$ by adding all arcs from $L$ to $R$. Finally, we investigate whether, for all pairs of positive integers $k_1,k_2$, there exists an integer $f(k_1,k_2)$ such that if $D$ is an oriented graph with ${\rm inv}(D) \geq f(k_1,k_2)$ then there is a partition $(V_1, V_2)$ of $V(D)$ such that ${\rm inv}(D\langle V_i\rangle) \geq k_i$ for $i=1,2$. We show that $f(1,k)$ exists and $f(1,k)\leq k+10$ for all positive integers $k$. Further, we show that $f(k_1,k_2)$ exists for all pairs of positive integers $k_1,k_2$ when the oriented graphs in consideration are restricted to be tournaments.

math.CO↗