Felix Matthias Saaro | Searcharxiv

arXiv2026

Your Voice Cloning System is Secretly a Voice Anonymizer

Speaker anonymization suppresses speaker-identifying attributes from speech while preserving linguistic content and quality. We propose repurposing XTTSv2, a multilingual voice cloning model trained on 27k hours of speech, for speaker anonymization without retraining. Our key insight is that XTTSv2's voice cloning capabilities preserve prosodic structure independently of speaker identity, enabling voice conversion by conditioning on a pseudo-speaker. We introduce an iterative refinement strategy that balances privacy and utility by maximizing a harmonic mean of speaker dissimilarity and intelligibility. Evaluated on seven European languages across CommonVoice and Multilingual LibriSpeech, our system achieves near-optimal privacy (EER $\approx$ 0.49), competitive intelligibility, and substantially better speech quality than dedicated anonymization baselines, while requiring no language-specific training. We release the code here: https://github.com/rm00cr/coqui-tts.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

The RAT: A Unified Bayesian Model for RAG Evaluation

Evaluating Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems requires assessing not only end-to-end correctness but also how individual components interact and how errors propagate through the pipeline. We introduce a Bayesian evaluation framework that jointly models retrieval success, abstention behavior, and answer correctness, factorized according to the pipeline's information flow. The model distinguishes task success. Whether the user received a correct answer (from generator success) and whether the generator behaved appropriately given the retrieval outcome. We apply the framework to 27 RAG configurations across three datasets, three retrievers, and three generators, and show that the conditional decomposition reveals substantial behavioral differences between systems that appear equivalent under marginal metrics. We further analyze the annotation allocation problem, demonstrating that retrieval-success annotations are more informative than task-success annotations for estimating policy adherence, and provide an information-theoretic explanation for this asymmetry. Finally, we extend the model to incorporate LLM-as-a-judge annotations as calibrated noisy observations, enabling practitioners to combine limited human judgments with cheaper automated assessments within a unified probabilistic model.

cs.CL↗