SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Francis K. C. Hui

Publications and source records attributed to Francis K. C. Hui.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Finite Mixtures of Generalized Estimating Equations for Clustering Multivariate Correlated Outcomes

Multivariate correlated outcomes occur across disciplines, including ecology, social sciences, and psychometrics. This paper focuses on clustering these outcomes across observational units, specifically, finding groups of units with the same ``outcome profile". Our motivation comes from bioregionalization in ecology, which aims to cluster sites into bioregions with the same species profiles, where site membership can depend on environmental or habitat covariates. To accomplish this, we propose finite mixtures of generalized estimating equations (MixGEE). Unlike existing approaches to model-based bioregionalization, MixGEE partitions sites into regions while accounting for between-species correlations through a region-specific working correlation structure. Thus, each region is characterized by a marginal species mean vector and a between-species correlation matrix. Unlike likelihood-based finite mixture models, MixGEE does not require a full joint distribution of the multivariate outcomes. Instead, we construct a pseudo-posterior probability for region membership motivated by the large-sample distribution of the estimating equation. This leads to an iterative algorithm alternating between updating these probabilities and solving weighted estimating equations. We determine the number of regions using cross-validation based on predictive performance for held-out sites and species components, and use a clustered Dirichlet random-weight bootstrap for uncertainty quantification. Simulations demonstrate reliable estimation and inference under various correlation structures and more stable selection of the number of groups than methods that ignore dependence. Applying MixGEE to presence--absence records of fish species around the Kerguelen Plateau reveals three distinct fish assemblage profiles with heterogeneous occurrence and within-site correlation patterns.

stat.ME

Gradient Boosted Mixed Models: Flexible Estimation of Mean and Variance Components for Clustered Data

We introduce a novel way to combine gradient boosting with mixed effects models, whereby the mean and variance components are learned jointly as functions of covariates via likelihood-based gradients. Gradient Boosted Mixed Models (GBMixed) estimates a nonparametric fixed effects function characterizing the overall mean of the response, while also allowing the random effects covariance matrix along with the residual variance to depend on covariates in a flexible manner. We demonstrate how GBMixed facilitates covariate-dependent random effect predictions, and subsequently point predictions and prediction intervals for individual treatment effects, that can adapt between population-level and cluster-level information. Experiments and applications to two real-world datasets show that GBMixed can accurately recover complex nonlinear fixed effect functions and covariate-dependent covariances in a linear mixed model, while also improving point and probabilistic predictive performance compared with several existing approaches such as parametric linear mixed models, Natural Gradient Boosting, and Gaussian Process Boosting. In simulations where the variance components are designed to vary as a function of covariates, GBMixed reduces the mean squared error in recovering the random effects variance function by a factor of eight relative to linear mixed models and Gaussian Process Boosting.

stat.ML

A Single Index Approach to Integrated Species Distribution Modeling for Fisheries Abundance Data

In fisheries ecology, species abundance data are often collected by multiple surveys, each with unique characteristics. This article is motivated by a dataset of Atlantic sea scallop abundance records along the northeast coast of the United States, collected from two bottom trawl surveys which cover a larger spatial domain but have low catch efficiency, and a dredge survey which is more efficient but more bounded in domain. Over the past decade, integrated species distribution models (ISDMs) that include common environmental effects along with correlated survey-specific spatial fields have been used to incorporate information from multiple surveys. While flexible, ISDMs can be susceptible to overfitting, which can complicate interpretability of the shared environmental effects, and potentially lead to poor predictive performance. To overcome these drawbacks, we introduce a novel single index ISDM, built from a single index (with spatial random effects) that represents a latent measure of the true species distribution, and survey-specific catch efficiency functions which map the single index to the survey-specific expected catch. In this article, these functions are constructed via logistic functions or semiparametric spline-based functions. Simulations and application to the motivating sea scallop abundance data demonstrate that the proposed single index ISDM offers more meaningful interpretations of the environmental effects and survey catch efficiency differences, while achieving similar to or better predictive performance than existing ISDMs.

stat.AP

Restricted maximum likelihood estimation in generalized linear mixed models

Restricted maximum likelihood (REML) estimation is a widely accepted and frequently used method for fitting linear mixed models, with its principal advantage being that it produces less biased estimates of the variance components. However, the concept of REML does not immediately generalize to the setting of non-normally distributed responses, and it is not always clear the extent to which, either asymptotically or in finite samples, such generalizations reduce the bias of variance component estimates compared to standard unrestricted maximum likelihood estimation. In this article, we review various attempts that have been made over the past four decades to extend REML estimation in generalized linear mixed models. We establish four major classes of approaches, namely approximate linearization, integrated likelihood, modified profile likelihoods, and direct bias correction of the score function, and show that while these four classes may have differing motivations and derivations, they often arrive at a similar if not the same REML estimate. We compare the finite sample performance of these four classes, along with methods for REML estimation in hierarchical generalized linear models, through a numerical study involving binary and count data, with results demonstrating that all approaches perform similarly well reducing the finite sample size bias of variance components. Overall, we believe REML estimation should more widely adopted by practitioners using generalized linear mixed models, and that the exact choice of which REML approach to use should, at this point in time, be driven by software availability and ease of implementation.

stat.ME

Robust Linear Mixed Models using Hierarchical Gamma-Divergence

Linear mixed models (LMMs) are a popular class of methods for analyzing longitudinal and clustered data. However, such models can be sensitive to outliers, and this can lead to biased inference on model parameters and inaccurate prediction of random effects if the data are contaminated. We propose a new approach to robust estimation and inference for LMMs using a hierarchical gamma-divergence, which offers an automated, data-driven approach to downweight the effects of outliers occurring in both the error and the random effects, using normalized powered density weights. For estimation and inference, we develop a computationally scalable minorization-maximization algorithm for the resulting objective function, along with a clustered bootstrap method for uncertainty quantification and a Hyvarinen score criterion for selecting a tuning parameter controlling the degree of robustness. Under suitable regularity conditions, we show the resulting robust estimates can be asymptotically controlled even under a heavy level of (covariate-dependent) contamination. Simulation studies demonstrate hierarchical gamma-divergence consistently outperforms several currently available methods for robustifying LMMs. We also illustrate the proposed method using data from a multi-center AIDS cohort study.

stat.ME

Joint Mean and Correlation Regression Models for Multivariate Data

We propose a joint mean and correlation regression model for multivariate discrete and (semi-)continuous response data, that simultaneously regresses the mean of each response against a set of covariates, and the correlations between responses against a set of similarity/distance measures. A set of joint estimating equations are formulated to construct an estimator of both the mean regression coefficients and the correlation regression parameters. Under a general setting where the number of responses can tend to infinity, the joint estimator is demonstrated to be consistent and asymptotically normally distributed, with differing rates of convergence due to the mean regression coefficients being heterogeneous across responses. An iterative estimation procedure is developed to obtain parameter estimates in the required (constrained) parameter space. Simulations demonstrate the strong finite sample performance of the proposed estimator in terms of point estimation and inference. We apply the proposed model to a count dataset of 38 Carabidae ground beetle species sampled throughout Scotland, along with information about the environmental conditions of each site and the traits of each species. Results show the relationship between mean abundance and environmental covariates differs across the beetle species, and that beetle total length is important in driving the correlations between species.

stat.ME

An Ising Similarity Regression Model for Modeling Multivariate Binary Data

Understanding the dependence structure between response variables is an important component in the analysis of correlated multivariate data. This article focuses on modeling dependence structures in multivariate binary data, motivated by a study aiming to understand how patterns in different U.S. senators' votes are determined by similarities (or lack thereof) in their attributes, e.g., political parties and social network profiles. To address such a research question, we propose a new Ising similarity regression model which regresses pairwise interaction coefficients in the Ising model against a set of similarity measures available/constructed from covariates. Model selection approaches are further developed through regularizing the pseudo-likelihood function with an adaptive lasso penalty to enable the selection of relevant similarity measures. We establish estimation and selection consistency of the proposed estimator under a general setting where the number of similarity measures and responses tend to infinity. Simulation study demonstrates the strong finite sample performance of the proposed estimator, particularly compared with several existing Ising model estimators in estimating the matrix of pairwise interaction coefficients. Applying the Ising similarity regression model to a dataset of roll call voting records of 100 U.S. senators, we are able to quantify how similarities in senators' parties, businessman occupations and social network profiles drive their voting associations.

stat.ME

Random Effects Misspecification and its Consequences for Prediction in Generalized Linear Mixed Models

When fitting generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs), one important decision to make relates to the choice of the random effects distribution. As the random effects are unobserved, misspecification of this distribution is a real possibility. In this article, we investigate the consequences of random effects misspecification for point prediction and prediction inference in GLMMs, a topic on which there is considerably less research compared to consequences for parameter estimation and inference. We use theory, simulation, and a real application to explore the effect of using the common normality assumption for the random effects distribution when the correct specification is a mixture of normal distributions, focusing on the impacts on point prediction, mean squared prediction errors (MSEPs), and prediction intervals. We found that the optimal shrinkage is different under the two random effect distributions, so is impacted by misspecification. The unconditional MSEPs for the random effects are almost always larger under the misspecified normal random effects distribution, especially when cluster sizes are small. Results for the MSEPs conditional on the random effects are more complicated, but they remain generally larger under the misspecified distribution when the true random effect is close to the mean of one of the component distributions in the true mixture distribution. Results for prediction intervals indicate that overall coverage probability is not greatly impacted by misspecification.

stat.ME

Variational Bayes for Mixture of Gaussian Structural Equation Models

Structural equation models (SEMs) are commonly used to study the structural relationship between observed variables and latent constructs. Recently, Bayesian fitting procedures for SEMs have received more attention thanks to their potential to facilitate the adoption of more flexible model structures, and variational approximations have been shown to provide fast and accurate inference for Bayesian analysis of SEMs. However, the application of variational approximations is currently limited to very simple, elemental SEMs. We develop mean-field variational Bayes algorithms for two SEM formulations for data that present non-Gaussian features such as skewness and multimodality. The proposed models exploit the use of mixtures of Gaussians, include covariates for the analysis of latent traits and consider missing data. We also examine two variational information criteria for model selection that are straightforward to compute in our variational inference framework. The performance of the MFVB algorithms and information criteria is investigated in a simulated data study and a real data application.

stat.ME

A Comparison of Joint Species Distribution Models for Percent Cover Data

1. Joint species distribution models (JSDMs) have gained considerable traction among ecologists over the past decade, due to their capacity to answer a wide range of questions at both the species- and the community-level. The family of generalized linear latent variable models in particular has proven popular for building JSDMs, being able to handle many response types including presence-absence data, biomass, overdispersed and/or zero-inflated counts. 2. We extend latent variable models to handle percent cover data, with vegetation, sessile invertebrate, and macroalgal cover data representing the prime examples of such data arising in community ecology. 3. Sparsity is a commonly encountered challenge with percent cover data. Responses are typically recorded as percentages covered per plot, though some species may be completely absent or present, i.e., have 0% or 100% cover respectively, rendering the use of beta distribution inadequate. 4. We propose two JSDMs suitable for percent cover data, namely a hurdle beta model and an ordered beta model. We compare the two proposed approaches to a beta distribution for shifted responses, transformed presence-absence data, and an ordinal model for percent cover classes. Results demonstrate the hurdle beta JSDM was generally the most accurate at retrieving the latent variables and predicting ecological percent cover data.

stat.ME

Likelihood-based surrogate dimension reduction

We consider the problem of surrogate sufficient dimension reduction, that is, estimating the central subspace of a regression model, when the covariates are contaminated by measurement error. When no measurement error is present, a likelihood-based dimension reduction method that relies on maximizing the likelihood of a Gaussian inverse regression model on the Grassmann manifold is well-known to have superior performance to traditional inverse moment methods. We propose two likelihood-based estimators for the central subspace in measurement error settings, which make different adjustments to the observed surrogates. Both estimators are computed based on maximizing objective functions on the Grassmann manifold and are shown to consistently recover the true central subspace. When the central subspace is assumed to depend on only a few covariates, we further propose to augment the likelihood function with a penalty term that induces sparsity on the Grassmann manifold to obtain sparse estimators. The resulting objective function has a closed-form Riemann gradient which facilitates efficient computation of the penalized estimator. We leverage the state-of-the-art trust region algorithm on the Grassmann manifold to compute the proposed estimators efficiently. Simulation studies and a data application demonstrate the proposed likelihood-based estimators perform better than inverse moment-based estimators in terms of both estimation and variable selection accuracy.

stat.ME

Generalized Matrix Factorization: efficient algorithms for fitting generalized linear latent variable models to large data arrays

Unmeasured or latent variables are often the cause of correlations between multivariate measurements, which are studied in a variety of fields such as psychology, ecology, and medicine. For Gaussian measurements, there are classical tools such as factor analysis or principal component analysis with a well-established theory and fast algorithms. Generalized Linear Latent Variable models (GLLVMs) generalize such factor models to non-Gaussian responses. However, current algorithms for estimating model parameters in GLLVMs require intensive computation and do not scale to large datasets with thousands of observational units or responses. In this article, we propose a new approach for fitting GLLVMs to high-dimensional datasets, based on approximating the model using penalized quasi-likelihood and then using a Newton method and Fisher scoring to learn the model parameters. Computationally, our method is noticeably faster and more stable, enabling GLLVM fits to much larger matrices than previously possible. We apply our method on a dataset of 48,000 observational units with over 2,000 observed species in each unit and find that most of the variability can be explained with a handful of factors. We publish an easy-to-use implementation of our proposed fitting algorithm.

cs.LG

Fast, universal estimation of latent variable models using extended variational approximations

Generalized linear latent variable models (GLLVMs) are a class of methods for analyzing multi-response data which has garnered considerable popularity in recent years, for example, in the analysis of multivariate abundance data in ecology. One of the main features of GLLVMs is their capacity to handle a variety of responses types, such as (overdispersed) counts, binomial responses, (semi-)continuous, and proportions data. On the other hand, the introduction of underlying latent variables presents some major computational challenges, as the resulting marginal likelihood function involves an intractable integral for non-normally distributed responses. This has spurred research into approximation methods to overcome this integral, with a recent and particularly computationally scalable one being that of variational approximations (VA). However, research into the use of VA of GLLVMs and related models has been hampered by the fact that closed-form approximations have only been obtained for certain pairs of response distributions and link functions. In this article, we propose an extended variational approximations (EVA) approach which widens the set of VA-applicable GLLVMs drastically. EVA draws inspiration from the underlying idea of Laplace approximations: by replacing the complete-data likelihood function with its second order Taylor approximation about the mean of the variational distribution, we can obtain a closed-form approximation to the marginal likelihood of the GLLVM for any response type and link function. Through simulation studies and an application to testate amoebae data set in ecology, we demonstrate how EVA results in a universal approach to fitting GLLVMs, which remains competitive in terms of estimation and inferential performance relative to both standard VA and a Laplace approximation approach, while being computationally more scalable than both in practice.

stat.ME

Screening methods for linear errors-in-variables models in high dimensions

Microarray studies, in order to identify genes associated with an outcome of interest, usually produce noisy measurements for a large number of gene expression features from a small number of subjects. One common approach to analyzing such high-dimensional data is to use linear errors-in-variables models; however, current methods for fitting such models are computationally expensive. In this paper, we present two efficient screening procedures, namely corrected penalized marginal screening and corrected sure independence screening, to reduce the number of variables for final model building. Both screening procedures are based on fitting corrected marginal regression models relating the outcome to each contaminated covariate separately, which can be computed efficiently even with a large number of features. Under mild conditions, we show that these procedures achieve screening consistency and reduce the number of features considerably, even when the number of covariates grows exponentially with the sample size. Additionally, if the true covariates are weakly correlated, corrected penalized marginal screening can achieve full variable selection consistency. Through simulation studies and an analysis of gene expression data for bone mineral density of Norwegian women, we demonstrate that the two new screening procedures make estimation of linear errors-in-variables models computationally scalable in high dimensional settings, and improve finite sample estimation and selection performance compared with estimators that do not employ a screening stage.

stat.ME

Sparse Sliced Inverse Regression via Cholesky Matrix Penalization

We introduce a new sparse sliced inverse regression estimator called Cholesky matrix penalization and its adaptive version for achieving sparsity in estimating the dimensions of the central subspace. The new estimators use the Cholesky decomposition of the covariance matrix of the covariates and include a regularization term in the objective function to achieve sparsity in a computationally efficient manner. We establish the theoretical values of the tuning parameters that achieve estimation and variable selection consistency for the central subspace. Furthermore, we propose a new projection information criterion to select the tuning parameter for our proposed estimators and prove that the new criterion facilitates selection consistency. The Cholesky matrix penalization estimator inherits the strength of the Matrix Lasso and the Lasso sliced inverse regression estimator; it has superior performance in numerical studies and can be adapted to other sufficient dimension methods in the literature.

stat.ME

Symbolic Formulae for Linear Mixed Models

A statistical model is a mathematical representation of an often simplified or idealised data-generating process. In this paper, we focus on a particular type of statistical model, called linear mixed models (LMMs), that is widely used in many disciplines e.g.~agriculture, ecology, econometrics, psychology. Mixed models, also commonly known as multi-level, nested, hierarchical or panel data models, incorporate a combination of fixed and random effects, with LMMs being a special case. The inclusion of random effects in particular gives LMMs considerable flexibility in accounting for many types of complex correlated structures often found in data. This flexibility, however, has given rise to a number of ways by which an end-user can specify the precise form of the LMM that they wish to fit in statistical software. In this paper, we review the software design for specification of the LMM (and its special case, the linear model), focusing in particular on the use of high-level symbolic model formulae and two popular but contrasting R-packages in lme4 and asreml.

stat.ME

Semiparametric Regression using Variational Approximations

Semiparametric regression offers a flexible framework for modeling non-linear relationships between a response and covariates. A prime example are generalized additive models where splines (say) are used to approximate non-linear functional components in conjunction with a quadratic penalty to control for overfitting. Estimation and inference are then generally performed based on the penalized likelihood, or under a mixed model framework. The penalized likelihood framework is fast but potentially unstable, and choosing the smoothing parameters needs to be done externally using cross-validation, for instance. The mixed model framework tends to be more stable and offers a natural way for choosing the smoothing parameters, but for non-normal responses involves an intractable integral. In this article, we introduce a new framework for semiparametric regression based on variational approximations. The approach possesses the stability and natural inference tools of the mixed model framework, while achieving computation times comparable to using penalized likelihood. Focusing on generalized additive models, we derive fully tractable variational likelihoods for some common response types. We present several features of the variational approximation framework for inference, including a variational information matrix for inference on parametric components, and a closed-form update for estimating the smoothing parameter. We demonstrate the consistency of the variational approximation estimates, and an asymptotic normality result for the parametric component of the model. Simulation studies show the variational approximation framework performs similarly to and sometimes better than currently available software for fitting generalized additive models.

math.ST

Multi-species distribution modeling using penalized mixture of regressions

Multi-species distribution modeling, which relates the occurrence of multiple species to environmental variables, is an important tool used by ecologists for both predicting the distribution of species in a community and identifying the important variables driving species co-occurrences. Recently, Dunstan, Foster and Darnell [Ecol. Model. 222 (2011) 955-963] proposed using finite mixture of regression (FMR) models for multi-species distribution modeling, where species are clustered based on their environmental response to form a small number of "archetypal responses." As an illustrative example, they applied their mixture model approach to a presence-absence data set of 200 marine organisms, collected along the Great Barrier Reef in Australia. Little attention, however, was given to the problem of model selection - since the archetypes (mixture components) may depend on different but likely overlapping sets of covariates, a method is needed for performing variable selection on all components simultaneously. In this article, we consider using penalized likelihood functions for variable selection in FMR models. We propose two penalties which exploit the grouped structure of the covariates, that is, each covariate is represented by a group of coefficients, one for each component. This leads to an attractive form of shrinkage that allows a covariate to be removed from all components simultaneously. Both penalties are shown to possess specific forms of variable selection consistency, with simulations indicating they outperform other methods which do not take into account the grouped structure. When applied to the Great Barrier Reef data set, penalized FMR models offer more insight into the important variables driving species co-occurrence in the marine community (compared to previous results where no model selection was conducted), while offering a computationally stable method of modeling complex species-environment relationships (through regularization).

stat.AP