Franciszek Łukowski | Searcharxiv

arXiv2026

Evaluation of Power-Clock Waveforms for Positive Feedback Adiabatic Logic in 16 nm FinFET Technology

Adiabatic logic can recover part of the energy stored on load capacitances through quasi-reversible switching, but its waveform-optimized operation in FinFET technology and at multi-GHz frequencies remains underexplored. This work investigates Positive Feedback Adiabatic Logic (PFAL) in the TSMC 16 nm FinFET process. A functionally complete PFAL gate library is designed, verified, and characterised using energy-delay product optimization over power-clock amplitude, frequency, and waveform shape. The power-clock sweep shows that the minimum-energy waveform approaches a triangular shape rather than a conventional trapezoid. The optimized single-gate PFAL cells achieve up to 3.83x lower energy than equivalent static CMOS gates, while sinusoidal excitation improves energy by up to 1.32x compared with trapezoidal excitation and extends the valid operating range. The library is then used to construct larger combinational circuits, including a 2:1 multiplexer, a 4-bit ripple carry adder, and a 4-bit Brent-Kung carry look-ahead adder. The carry look-ahead adder reaches a gain of up to 5.3x compared with the static CMOS energy estimate for the triangular power-clock.

cs.AR↗

arXiv2026

Evaluating Positive Feedback Adiabatic Logic in 16nm FinFET with a Realistic Power-Clock

Adiabatic logic reuses the energy stored on load capacitances through quasi-reversible switching, enabling a lower minimum energy consumption than conventional static CMOS. Yet its practicality in FinFET technologies and at multi-GHz clock rates has yet to be investigated. This work provides a systematic evaluation of Positive Feedback Adiabatic Logic (PFAL) simulated in the TSMC 16nm FinFET process. A set of PFAL standard-cell gates were realised, along with two representative combinational circuits - a 2$\times$2 multiplier and a 4-bit comparator - and compared against static CMOS logic using the energy--delay product (EDP) and the energy advantage metric $η= E_{\mathrm{CMOS}} / E_{\mathrm{PFAL}}$. Transient simulations reveal three sources of non-adiabatic loss: two specific to the PMOS/NMOS latch, threshold-voltage-related loss and a previously unreported redundant charging of the output node and one related to the complexity of PFAL logic trees. The low-threshold Buffer/NOT cell achieves a minimum EDP of $1.23\times10^{-26}$J$\cdot$s at $V_{\mathrm{CLK}} = 0.6$V and $f_{\mathrm{CLK}} = 7.94$GHz, while PFAL preserves an energy benefit over static CMOS of up to roughly $5\times$ at reduced frequencies and elevated supply voltages. A parallel-coupled quadrature voltage-controlled oscillator is designed as a realistic four-phase power-clock generator. With this non-ideal supply, the Buffer/NOT energy stays within $2\%$ of the ideal sinusoidal case at $3$GHz. A loading study quantifies the phase shift and amplitude reduction induced by increasing fan-out. Overall, the results provide a design-oriented evaluation of PFAL in 16nm FinFET and a motivation to exploit adiabatic logic for future low-power system architectures.

cs.AR↗