arXiv subjects

Frank Zhigang Wang

Publications and source records attributed to Frank Zhigang Wang.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2025

Beyond Memristor: Neuromorphic Computing Using Meminductor

Memristor (resistor with memory), inductor with memory (meminductor) and capacitor with memory (memcapacitor) have different roles to play in novel computing architectures. We found that a coil with a magnetic core is an inductor with memory (meminductor) in terms of its inductance L(q) being a function of the charge q. The history of the current passing through the coil is remembered by the magnetization inside the magnetic core. Such a meminductor can play a unique role (that cannot be played by a memristor) in neuromorphic computing, deep learning and brain inspired since the time constant of a neuromorphic RLC circuit is jointly determined by the inductance and capacitance, rather than the resistance. As an experimental verification, this newly invented meminductor was used to reproduce the observed biological behaviour of amoebae (the memorizing, timing and anticipating mechanisms). In conclusion, a beyond memristor computing paradigm is theoretically sensible and experimentally practical.

cs.ET↗

arXiv2023

Approaching Landauer's Bound In A Spin-Encoded Quantum Computer

It is commonly recognized that the Landauer bound holds in (irreversible) quantum operations. In this study, we verified this bound by extracting a single spin from a spin-spin magnetic interaction experiment to demonstrate that the Landauer bound can be approached quantitatively with an approaching rate of 79.3 percent via quantum spin tunneling. An optically manipulated spin-encoded quantum computer is designed, in which energy bound near kB T to erase a spin qubit is theoretically sensible and experimentally verified. This work may represent the last piece of the puzzle in quantum Landauer erasure in terms of a single spin being the smallest information carrier.

physics.gen-ph↗

arXiv2023

Near-Landauer-Bound Quantum Computing Using Single Spins

This study is the first experimental verification of the Landauer bound on a single spin, which is the smallest information carrier in size. We used four experiments (single spin experiment, giant spin experiment, nanomagnet experiment, and Stern-Gerlach experiment) to demonstrate that a single spin was much more energy efficient than other information carriers due to its small size and weak coupling with the surroundings. We conclude that quantum spintronics, with single spins as qubits, is an energy-efficient computing paradigm that requires the smallest amount of energy, close to the theoretical Landauer bound to perform computations.

physics.gen-ph↗

arXiv2022

Memristive Charge-Flux Interaction Still Makes It Possible To Find An Ideal Memristor

In 1971, Chua defined an ideal memristor that links charge q and flux phi. In this work, we demonstrated that the direct interaction between physical charge q and physical flux phi is memristive by nature in terms of a time-invariant phi-q curve being nonlinear, continuously differentiable and strictly monotonically increasing. Nevertheless, this structure still suffers from two serious limitations: 1, a parasitic inductor effect, and 2. bistability and dynamic sweep of a continuous resistance range. Then we discussed how to make a fully-functioning ideal memristor with multiple or an infinite number of stable states and no parasitic inductance, and gave a number of suggestions, such as open structure, nanoscale size, magnetic materials with cubic anisotropy (or even isotropy), and sequential switching of the magnetic domains. At last, we responded to a recent challenge from arXiv.org that claims that the structure reported in our retracted JAP paper is simply an inductor with memory since it did not pass their designed capacitor-memristor circuit test. Contrary to their conjecture that an ideal memristor may not exist or may be a purely mathematical concept, we remain optimistic that researchers will discover an ideal memristor in nature or make one in the laboratory.

cond-mat.mes-hall↗

arXiv2021

Reply to "Comment on Phi memristor: Real memristor found", arXiv:1909.12464

In this reply, we will provide our impersonal, point-to-point responses to the major criticisms (in bold and underlined) in arXiv:1909.12464. Firstly, we will identify a number of (imperceptibly hidden) mistakes in the Comment in understanding/interpreting our physical model. Secondly, we will use a 3rd-party experiment carried out in 1961 (plus other 3rd-party experiments thereafter) to further support our claim that our invented Phi memristor is memristive in spite of the existence of a parasitic inductor effect. Thirdly, we will analyse this parasitic effect mathematically, introduce our work-in-progress (in nanoscale) and point out that this parasitic inductor effect should not become a big worry since it can be completely removed in the macro-scale devices and safely neglected in the nano-scale devices.

cs.ET↗