arXiv subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Fredrick I. Olness.
We investigate a simplified version of the ACOT prescription for calculating deeply inelastic scattering from Q^2 values near the squared mass M_H^2 of a heavy quark to Q^2 much larger than M_H^2.
We provide a brief overview of some current experimental and theoretical issues of heavy quark production.
Existing calculations of heavy quark production in charged-current and neutral current lepton-hadron scattering are formulated differently because of the artificial distinction of ``light'' and ``heavy'' quarks made in the traditional approach. A proper QCD formalism valid for a wide kinematic range from near threshold to energies much higher then the quark mass should treat these processes in a uniform way. We formulate a unified approach to both types of leptoproduction processes based on the conventional factorization theorem. In this paper, we present the general framework with complete kinematics appropriate for arbitrary masses, emphasizing the simplifications provided by the helicity formalism. We illustrate this approach with an explicit calculation of the leading order contribution to the quark structure functions with general masses. This provides the basis for a complete QCD analysis of charged current and neutral current leptoproduction of charm and bottom quarks to be presented in subsequent papers.
A unified QCD formulation of leptoproduction of massive quarks in charged current and neutral current processes is described. This involves adopting consistent factorization and renormalization schemes which encompass both vector-boson-gluon-fusion (flavor creation) and vector-boson-massive-quark-scattering (flavor excitation) production mechanisms. It provides a framework which is valid from the threshold for producing the massive quark (where gluon-fusion is dominant) to the very high energy regime when the typical energy scale μis much larger than the quark mass m_Q (where the quark-scattering should be prevalent). This approach effectively resums all large logarithms of the type (alpha_s(mu) log(mu^2/m_Q^2)^n which limit the validity of existing fixed-order calculations to the region mu ~ O(m_Q). We show that the (massive) quark-scattering contribution (after subtraction of overlaps) is important in most parts of the (x, Q) plane except near the threshold region. We demonstrate that the factorization scale dependence of the structure functions calculated in this approach is substantially less than those obtained in the fixed-order calculations, as one would expect from a more consistent formulation.
We provide a brief overview of some current experimental and theoretical issues of heavy quark production.
Existing calculations of heavy quark hadroproduction in perturbative QCD are either based on the approximate conventional zero-mass perturbative QCD theory or on next-to-leading order (NLO) fixed-flavor-number (FFN) scheme which is inadequate at high energies. We formulate this problem in the general mass variable-flavor-number scheme which incorporates initial/final state heavy quark parton distribution/fragmentation functions as well as exact mass dependence in the hard cross-section. This formalism has the built-in feature of reducing to the FFN scheme near threshold, and to the conventional zero-mass parton picture in the very high energy limit. Making use of existing calculations in NLO FFN scheme, we obtain more complete results on bottom production in the general scheme to order α_s^3 both for current accelerator energies and for LHC. The scale dependence of the cross-section is reduced, and the magnitude is increased with respect to the NLO FFN results. It is shown that the bulk of the large NLO FFN contribution to the single heavy-quark inclusive cross-section is already contained in the (resummed) order α_s^2 ``heavy flavor excitation'' term in the general scheme.
We report on the activities of the Precision Measurements Of Heavy Objects working group of the Very Large Hadron Collider Physics and Detector Workshop.
In a consistently formulated pQCD framework incorporating non-zero mass heavy quark partons, there is still the freedom to define parton distributions obeying either mass-independent or mass-dependent evolution equations, contrary to statements made in a recent paper by MRRS. With properly matched hard cross-sections, different choices merely correspond to different factorization schemes, and they yield the same physical cross-sections. We demonstrate this principle in a concrete order α_s calculation of the DIS charm structure function. We also examine the proper matching between parton definitions and subtractions in the hard cross-section near threshold where the calculation is particularly sensitive to mass effects of the heavy quark. The results obtained from the general-mass formalism are quite stable against different choices of scale and exhibit a smooth transition in the threshold region (using either mass-independent or mass-dependent evolution), in contrast to results of another recently proposed scheme.
Measurement of the distribution of hadronic energy in the final state in deeply inelastic electron scattering at HERA can provide a good test of our understanding of perturbative QCD. For this purpose, we consider the energy distribution function, which can be computed without needing final state parton fragmentation functions. We compute this distribution function for finite transverse momentum q_T at order alpha_s, and use the results to sum the perturbation series to obtain a result valid for both large and small values of transverse momentum.
There are presently two approaches to calculating heavy quark production for the deeply inelastic scattering process in current literature. The conventional fixed-flavor scheme focuses on the flavor creation mechanism and includes the heavy quark only as a final state particle in the hard scattering cross section; this has been computed to next-to-leading order--\alphas^2. The more recently formulated variable-flavor scheme includes, in addition, the flavor excitation process where the initial state partons of all flavors contribute above their respective threshold, as commonly accepted for calculations of other high energy processes; this was initially carried out to leading order--\alphas^1. We first compare and contrast these existing calculations. As expected from physical grounds, the next-to-leading-order fixed-flavor scheme calculation yields good results near threshold, while the leading-order variable-flavor scheme calculation works well for asymptotic Q^2. The quality of the calculations in the intermediate region is dependent upon the x and Q^2 values chosen. An accurate self-consistent QCD calculation over the entire range can be obtained by extending the variable-flavor scheme to next-to-leading-order. Recent work to carry out this calculation is described. Preliminary numerical results of this calculation are also presented for comparison.
We compare the results of the fixed-flavor scheme calculation of Laenen, Riemersma, Smith and van Neerven with the variable-flavor scheme calculation of Aivazis, Collins, Olness and Tung for neutral-current (photon-mediated) heavy-flavor (charm and bottom) production. We compare the structure function $F_2(x,Q^2)$ throughout phase space, and also analyze the $μ$-dependenceWe find that the former calculation is most applicable near threshold, while the latter works well for asymptotic $Q^2$.
We compare the results of the fixed-flavor scheme calculation of Laenen, Riemersma, Smith and van Neerven with the variable-flavor scheme calculation of Aivazis, Collins, Olness and Tung for the case of neutral-current (photon-mediated) heavy-flavor (charm and bottom) production. Specifically, we examine the features of both calculations throughout phase space and compare the structure function $F_2(x,Q^2)$. We also analyze the dependence of $F_2$ on the mass factorization scale $μ$. We find that the former is most applicable near threshold, while the latter works well for asymptotic $Q^2$. The validity of each calculation in the intermediate region is dependent upon the $x$ and $Q^2$ values chosen.