Fucheng Deng | Searcharxiv

arXiv2026

Does Gradient Conflict Predict the Understanding--Generation Trade-off? A Controlled Audit of Conflict-Metric Validity in Unified Multimodal Models

Unified multimodal models (UMMs) are increasingly designed around gradient conflict between understanding and generation objectives. The premise that reducing these metrics improves the downstream understanding-generation trade-off has never been tested directly. We audit it in a controlled testbed, GRIDUMM, which mirrors key structural ingredients of UMM training while making the ground-truth trade-off exactly computable. Across 63 configurations and 372 measured checkpoints, no directional conflict metric reaches an absolute Spearman correlation of 0.3 with a confidence interval excluding zero for conflict measured during training against the eventual trade-off. A dose-response intervention that monotonically suppresses conflict leaves the trade-off flat, separating correlation from causation. The norm ratio is a generation-failure detector and becomes null among configurations that master generation. Functional interference measures outperform directional conflict metrics, while training loss tracks the trade-off strongly. Our results do not show that conflict is useless; they show that its validity as a diagnostic target must be established, not assumed, and we release the audit protocol as a reusable standard.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Beyond Layers: Position-Resolved Gradient Conflict and Position-Aware Modulation for Unified Multimodal Models

Unified multimodal models (UMMs) train image understanding and autoregressive image generation on shared parameters, and the two objectives are known to interfere. Existing diagnoses and remedies operate at the resolution of layers or experts, measuring conflict per layer and resolving it by separating parameters. We argue that this resolution hides an orthogonal axis. Generation in a UMM is next-token prediction over a raster sequence of visual tokens whose roles vary systematically with position, so how strongly a generation gradient interferes with understanding should depend on where in the sequence it originates. We introduce a position-resolved interference map that attributes understanding-generation gradient conflict to visual-token positions within every layer, computed from a single backward pass at $1.2\times$ the cost of a standard backward pass. On Show-o and Janus-Pro, position explains a large share of conflict variance after controlling for depth (partial $η^2=0.31$ vs. $0.35$ for layer on Show-o; $0.15$ vs. $0.30$ on Janus-Pro): the first quarter of the sequence has a mean gradient cosine of $-0.18$ against understanding, the last quarter $-0.02$. The dependence survives per-position gradient-norm normalization, retaining $80%$ of its effect size, and conflict strength tracks semantic content (Spearman $ρ=0.64$). Building on the map, we propose position-aware modulation (PAM), which removes the anti-aligned component of generation gradients only at high-conflict positions without changing the architecture. Under a matched trainable-parameter budget, PAM improves over layer-wise separation by $+21$ MME and $+2.4$ GenEval points on Show-o while matching it on POPE and overall FID; a random-position control recovers about $31%$ of the gain. Position-based and layer-based separation are complementary degrees of freedom and can be combined.

cs.CV↗