Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

G. Aguilar-Argüello

Publications and source records attributed to G. Aguilar-Argüello.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Morphological Classification of Galaxies Through Structural and Star Formation Parameters Using Machine Learning

We employ the XGBoost machine learning (ML) method for the morphological classification of galaxies into two (early-type, late-type) and five (E, S0--S0a, Sa--Sb, Sbc--Scd, Sd--Irr) classes, using a combination of non-parametric ($C,\,A,\,S,\,A_S,\,\mathrm{Gini},\,M_{20},\,c_{5090}$), parametric (Sérsic index, $n$), geometric (axial ratio, $BA$), global colour ($g-i,\,u-r,\,u-i$), colour gradient ($Δ(g - i)$), and asymmetry gradient ($ΔA_{9050}$) information, all estimated for a local galaxy sample ($z<0.15$) compiled from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) imaging data. We train the XGBoost model and evaluate its performance through multiple standard metrics. Our findings reveal better performance when utilizing all fourteen parameters, achieving accuracies of 88\% and 65\% for the two-class and five-class classification tasks, respectively. In addition, we investigate a hierarchical classification approach for the five-class scenario, combining three XGBoost classifiers. We observe comparable performance to the ``direct'' five-class classification, with discrepancies of only up to 3\%. Using SHAP (an advanced interpretation tool), we analyse how galaxy parameters impact the model's classifications, providing valuable insights into the influence of these features on classification outcomes. Finally, we compare our results with previous studies and find them consistently aligned.

astro-ph.GA↗

Assessing the Hierarchical Hamiltonian Splitting Integrator for Collisionless N-body Simulations

The large dynamic range in some astrophysical N-body problems led to the use of adaptive multi-time-steps; however, the search for optimal strategies is still challenging. We numerically quantify the performance of the hierarchical Hamiltonian Splitting (HHS) integrator for collisionless simulations using a direct summation code. We compare HHS with the constant global time-step leapfrog integrator, and with the adaptive one (AKDK). We find that HHS is approximately reversible, whereas AKDK not. Therefore, it is possible to find a combination of parameters where the energy drift is considerably milder for HHS, resulting in a better performance. We conclude that HHS is an attractive alternative to AKDK, and it is certainly advantageous for direct summation and P3M codes. Also, we find advantages with GADGET4 (Tree/FMM) HHS implementation that are worth exploring further.

astro-ph.CO↗

Non-linear Structure Formation for Dark Energy Models with a Steep Equation of State

We study the nonlinear regime of large scale structure formation considering a dynamical dark energy (DE) component determined by a Steep Equation of State parametrization (SEoS) $w(z)=w_0+w_i\frac{(z/z_T)^q}{1+(z/z_T)^q}$. In order to perform the model exploration at low computational cost, we modified the public code L-PICOLA. We incorporate the DE model by means of the first and second-order matter perturbations in the Lagrangian frame and the expansion parameter. We analyze deviations of SEoS models with respect to $Λ$CDM in the non-linear matter power spectrum ($P_k$), the halo mass function (HMF), and the two-point correlation function (2PCF). On quantifying the nature of steep (SEoS-I) and smooth transitions in DE field (CPL-lim), no signature of steep transition is observed, rather found the overall impact of DE behaviors in $P_k$ at level of $\sim 2-3\%$ and $\sim 3-4\%$ differences w.r.t $Λ$CDM at $z=0$ respectively. HMF shows the possibility to distinguish between the models at the high mass ends. The best-fitted model assuming only background and linear perturbations dubbed as SEoS-II largely deviates from $Λ$CDM and current observations on studying the nonlinear growth. This large deviation in SEoS-II also quantified the combined effect of the dynamical DE and the larger amount of matter contained, $Ω_{m0}$ and $H_{0}$ accordingly. 2PCF results are relatively robust with $\sim 1-2 \%$ deviation for SEoS-I and CPL-lim and a significant deviation for SEoS-II throughout $r$ from $Λ$CDM. Finally, we conclude that the search for viable DE models (like the SEoS) must include non-linear growth constraints.

astro-ph.CO↗