Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

G. Valogiannis

Publications and source records attributed to G. Valogiannis.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Modified Gravity Constraints from the Full Shape Modeling of Clustering Measurements from DESI 2024

We present cosmological constraints on deviations from general relativity (GR) from the first-year of clustering observations from Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) in combination with other datasets. We first consider $μ(a,k)$-$Σ(a,k)$ modified gravity (MG) parametrization (as well as $η(a,k)$) in flat $Λ$CDM and $w_0 w_a$CDM backgrounds. Using a functional form for time-only evolution gives $μ_0=0.11^{+0.44}_{-0.54}$ from DESI(FS+BAO)+BBN and a wide prior on $n_{s}$. Using DESI(FS+BAO)+CMB+DESY3+DESY5-SN, we obtain $μ_0=0.05\pm 0.22$ and $Σ_0=0.008\pm 0.045$ in the $Λ$CDM background. In $w_0 w_a$CDM, we obtain $μ_0=-0.24^{+0.32}_{-0.28}$ and $Σ_0=0.006\pm 0.043$, consistent with GR, and still find a preference for dynamical dark energy with $w_0>-1$ and $w_a<0$. We then use binned forms in the 2 backgrounds starting with 2 bins in redshift and then adding 2 bins in scale for a total of 4 and 8 MG parameters, respectively. All MG parameters are found consistent with GR. We also find that the tension reported for $Σ_0$ with GR from Planck PR3 goes away when using LoLLiPoP+HiLLiPoP likelihoods. As noted previously, this seems to indicate the tension is related to CMB lensing anomaly in PR3 which is also resolved when using these likelihoods. We then constrain the class of Horndeski theory in both EFT-basis and $α$-basis. Assuming a power law for the non-minimal coupling function $Ω$, we obtain $Ω_0=0.012^{+0.001}_{-0.012}$ and $s_0=0.996^{+0.54}_{-0.20}$ from DESI(FS+BAO)+DESY5SN+CMB in a $Λ$CDM background, consistent with GR. Using the $α$-basis with no-braiding ($α_B=0$) gives $c_M<1.14$, in agreement with GR. However, we see a mild yet consistent indication for $c_B>0$ when $α_B$ is varied which will require further study to determine whether this is due to systematics or new physics. [Abridged]

astro-ph.CO↗

Missing Components in ΛCDM from DESI Y1 BAO Measurements: Insights from Redshift Remapping

We explore transformations of the Friedman-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker (FLRW) metric and cosmological parameters that align with observational data, aiming to gain insights into potential extensions of standard cosmological models. We modify the FLRW metric by introducing a scaling factor, $e^{2Θ(a)}$ (the cosmological scaling function, CSF), which alters the standard relationship between cosmological redshift and the cosmic scale factor without affecting angular measurements or Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) anisotropies. Using data from DESI Year 1, Pantheon+ supernovae, and the Planck CMB temperature power spectrum, we constrain both the CSF and cosmological parameters through a Markov Chain Monte Carlo approach. Our results indicate that the CSF model fits observational data with a lower Hubble constant (although it is compatible with the value given by Planck 2018 within 1$σ$) and is predominantly dark-matter-dominated. Additionally, the CSF model produces temperature and lensing power spectra similar to those predicted by the standard model, though with lower values in the CSF model at large scales. We have also checked that when fitting a CSF model without dark energy to the data, we obtain a more negative conformal function. This suggests that the CSF model may offer hints about missing elements and opens up a new avenue for exploring physical interpretations of cosmic acceleration.

astro-ph.CO↗

Extended Dark Energy analysis using DESI DR2 BAO measurements

We conduct an extended analysis of dark energy constraints, in support of the findings of the DESI DR2 cosmology key paper, including DESI data, Planck CMB observations, and three different supernova compilations. Using a broad range of parametric and non-parametric methods, we explore the dark energy phenomenology and find consistent trends across all approaches, in good agreement with the $w_0w_a$CDM key paper results. Even with the additional flexibility introduced by non-parametric approaches, such as binning and Gaussian Processes, we find that extending $Λ$CDM to include a two-parameter $w(z)$ is sufficient to capture the trends present in the data. Finally, we examine three dark energy classes with distinct dynamics, including quintessence scenarios satisfying $w \geq -1$, to explore what underlying physics can explain such deviations. The current data indicate a clear preference for models that feature a phantom crossing; although alternatives lacking this feature are disfavored, they cannot yet be ruled out. Our analysis confirms that the evidence for dynamical dark energy, particularly at low redshift ($z \lesssim 0.3$), is robust and stable under different modeling choices.

astro-ph.CO↗