arXiv subjects

Gaëtan Regaud

Publications and source records attributed to Gaëtan Regaud.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

The Complexity of Generalized HyperLTL with Stuttering and Contexts

We settle the complexity of satisfiability, finite-state satisfiability, and model-checking for generalized HyperLTL with stuttering and contexts, an expressive logic for the specification of asynchronous hyperproperties. Such properties cannot be specified in HyperLTL, as it is restricted to synchronous hyperproperties. Nevertheless, we prove that satisfiability is $Σ_1^1$-complete and thus not harder than for HyperLTL. On the other hand, we prove that model-checking and finite-state satisfiability are equivalent to truth in second-order arithmetic, and thus much harder than the decidable HyperLTL model-checking problem and the $Σ_0^1$-complete HyperLTL finite-state satisfiability problem. The lower bounds for the model-checking and finite-state satisfiability problems hold even when only allowing stuttering or only allowing contexts.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2026

The Complexity of Asynchronous HyperLTL

Hyperproperties express, e.g., information-flow properties of systems, which involves the simultaneous reasoning about multiple execution traces of a system. Consequently, HyperLTL, the most important specification logic for hyperproperties, extends LTL with quantification over traces. However, HyperLTL can only express synchronous hyperproperties. Recently, several logics for asynchronous hyperproperties have been proposed. Here, we focus on AHLTL, asynchronous HyperLTL, which extends HyperLTL with quantification over trajectories that control the relative speed at which time progresses on the quantified traces. Model-checking AHLTL is known to be undecidable while satisfiability is known to be $Σ_1^1$-hard, but the precise complexity of both problems is open. Here, we close these gaps and show that model-checking is equivalent to truth in second-order arithmetic while satisfiability is $Σ_1^1$-complete if the trajectory is existentially quantified and $Σ_1^1$-hard and in $Σ_2^1$ if the trajectory is universally quantified.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2026

The Complexity of Second-order HyperLTL

We determine the complexity of second-order HyperLTL satisfiability, finite-state satisfiability, and model-checking: All three are equivalent to truth in third-order arithmetic. We also consider two fragments of second-order HyperLTL that have been introduced with the aim to facilitate effective model-checking by restricting the sets one can quantify over. The first one restricts second-order quantification to smallest/largest sets that satisfy a guard while the second one restricts second-order quantification further to least fixed points of (first-order) HyperLTL definable functions. All three problems for the first fragment are still equivalent to truth in third-order arithmetic while satisfiability for the second fragment is $Σ_1^2$-complete, and finite-state satisfiability and model-checking are equivalent to truth in second-order arithmetic. Finally, we also introduce closed-world semantics for second-order HyperLTL, where set quantification ranges only over subsets of the model, while set quantification in standard semantics ranges over arbitrary sets of traces. Here, satisfiability for the least fixed point fragment becomes $Σ_1^1$-complete, but all other results are unaffected.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2026

The Complexity of HyperQPTL

HyperQPTL and HyperQPTL$^+$ are expressive specification languages for hyperproperties, properties that relate multiple executions of a system. Tight complexity bounds are known for HyperQPTL finite-state satisfiability and model-checking. Here, we settle the complexity of satisfiability for HyperQPTL as well as satisfiability, finite-state satisfiability, and model-checking for HyperQPTL$^+$: the former is $Σ^2_1$-complete, the latter are all equivalent to truth in third-order arithmetic, i.e., all four are very undecidable.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2025

The Complexity of Generalized HyperLTL with Stuttering and Contexts

We settle the complexity of satisfiability and model-checking for generalized HyperLTL with stuttering and contexts, an expressive logic for the specification of asynchronous hyperproperties. Such properties cannot be specified in HyperLTL, as it is restricted to synchronous hyperproperties. Nevertheless, we prove that satisfiability is $Σ_1^1$-complete and thus not harder than for HyperLTL. On the other hand, we prove that model-checking is equivalent to truth in second-order arithmetic, and thus much harder than the decidable HyperLTL model-checking problem. The lower bounds for the model-checking problem hold even when only allowing stuttering or only allowing contexts.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2025

The Complexity of Fragments of Second-Order HyperLTL

We settle the complexity of satisfiability, finite-state satisfiability, and model-checking for several fragments of second-order HyperLTL, which extends HyperLTL with quantification over sets of traces: they are all in the analytical hierarchy and beyond

cs.LO↗