arXiv subjects

Gabriela Morgenshtern

Publications and source records attributed to Gabriela Morgenshtern.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

AI-Centered Grand Challenges in Visual Analytics for Healthcare: Synthesizing the VAHC 2025 Community Experience

The intersection of AI, healthcare, and visualization is evolving rapidly, posing challenges that cut across disciplinary boundaries and resist easy resolution. The Visual Analytics in Healthcare workshop (VAHC), co-located every other year at the IEEE VIS conference and the AMIA (American Medical Informatics Association) annual conference, has served as a forum to connect the visualization and medical informatics community since 2010. In 2025, to celebrate the 16th edition, we used the workshop as an opportunity to consolidate the community's collective experience (and expertise) and identify Grand Challenges where the field should prioritize going forward. We combined thematic coding of the 15 accepted VAHC workshop papers with structured group discussions among more than 40 participants, organized around three major themes: "Technical innovation vs. clinical reality", "Human-centered and scalable VAHC", and "From foundations to actionable insights", followed by post-workshop reflexive analysis. Across all three groups, AI emerged as the most consistently recurring concern. In this paper, we report our AI-centered insights from the VAHC 2025 group activity, contextualize them against the broader literature along five Grand Challenges themes, and distill them into five challenge clusters, each concluded with recommendations for future research directions that cross disciplinary boundaries: (1) trust and bias, (2) data and infrastructure, (3) explainability and communication, (4) human-AI interaction, and (5) model reliability and validation. We share these challenges and their associated research directions as a starting point for discussion and collaboration across the healthcare, AI, and visualization communities. All supplemental materials are available at https://osf.io/p79uj.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2024

DaedalusData: Exploration, Knowledge Externalization and Labeling of Particles in Medical Manufacturing -- A Design Study

In medical diagnostics of both early disease detection and routine patient care, particle-based contamination of in-vitro diagnostics consumables poses a significant threat to patients. Objective data-driven decision-making on the severity of contamination is key for reducing patient risk, while saving time and cost in quality assessment. Our collaborators introduced us to their quality control process, including particle data acquisition through image recognition, feature extraction, and attributes reflecting the production context of particles. Shortcomings in the current process are limitations in exploring thousands of images, data-driven decision making, and ineffective knowledge externalization. Following the design study methodology, our contributions are a characterization of the problem space and requirements, the development and validation of DaedalusData, a comprehensive discussion of our study's learnings, and a generalizable framework for knowledge externalization. DaedalusData is a visual analytics system that enables domain experts to explore particle contamination patterns, label particles in label alphabets, and externalize knowledge through semi-supervised label-informed data projections. The results of our case study and user study show high usability of DaedalusData and its efficient support of experts in generating comprehensive overviews of thousands of particles, labeling of large quantities of particles, and externalizing knowledge to augment the dataset further. Reflecting on our approach, we discuss insights on dataset augmentation via human knowledge externalization, and on the scalability and trade-offs that come with the adoption of this approach in practice.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2022

Considerations for Visualizing Uncertainty in Clinical Machine Learning Models

Clinician-facing predictive models are increasingly present in the healthcare setting. Regardless of their success with respect to performance metrics, all models have uncertainty. We investigate how to visually communicate uncertainty in this setting in an actionable, trustworthy way. To this end, we conduct a qualitative study with cardiac critical care clinicians. Our results reveal that clinician trust may be impacted most not by the degree of uncertainty, but rather by how transparent the visualization of what the sources of uncertainty are. Our results show a clear connection between feature interpretability and clinical actionability.

cs.HC↗