arXiv subjects

Gabrielle M Schroeder

Publications and source records attributed to Gabrielle M Schroeder.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2023

Temporal stability of intracranial EEG abnormality maps for localising epileptogenic tissue

Objective: Identifying abnormalities in interictal intracranial EEG, by comparing patient data to a normative map, has shown promise for the localisation of epileptogenic tissue and prediction of outcome. The approach typically uses short interictal segments of around one minute. However, the temporal stability of findings has not been established. Methods: Here, we generated a normative map of iEEG in non-pathological brain tissue from 249 patients. We computed regional band power abnormalities in a separate cohort of 39 patients for the duration of their monitoring period (0.92-8.62 days of iEEG data, mean 4.58 days per patient, over 4,800 hours recording). To assess the localising value of band power abnormality, we computed DRS - a measure of how different the surgically resected and spared tissue were in terms of band power abnormalities - over time. Results: In each patient, band power abnormality was relatively consistent over time. The median DRS of the entire recording period separated seizure free (ILAE = 1) and not seizure free (ILAE > 1) patients well (AUC = 0.69). This effect was similar interictally (AUC = 0.69) and peri-ictally (AUC = 0.71). Significance: Our results suggest that band power abnormality DRS, as a predictor of outcomes from epilepsy surgery, is a relatively robust metric over time. These findings add further support for abnormality mapping of neurophysiology data during presurgical evaluation.

q-bio.NC↗

arXiv2022

Normative brain mapping of interictal intracranial EEG to localise epileptogenic tissue

The identification of abnormal electrographic activity is important in a wide range of neurological disorders, including epilepsy for localising epileptogenic tissue. However, this identification may be challenging during non-seizure (interictal) periods, especially if abnormalities are subtle compared to the repertoire of possible healthy brain dynamics. Here, we investigate if such interictal abnormalities become more salient by quantitatively accounting for the range of healthy brain dynamics in a location-specific manner. To this end, we constructed a normative map of brain dynamics, in terms of relative band power, from interictal intracranial recordings from 234 subjects (21,598 electrode contacts). We then compared interictal recordings from 62 patients with epilepsy to the normative map to identify abnormal regions. We hypothesised that if the most abnormal regions were spared by surgery, then patients would be more likely to experience continued seizures post-operatively. We first confirmed that the spatial variations of band power in the normative map across brain regions were consistent with healthy variations reported in the literature. Second, when accounting for the normative variations, regions which were spared by surgery were more abnormal than those resected only in patients with persistent post-operative seizures (t=-3.6, p=0.0003), confirming our hypothesis. Third, we found that this effect discriminated patient outcomes (AUC=0.75 p=0.0003). Normative mapping is a well-established practice in neuroscientific research. Our study suggests that this approach is feasible to detect interictal abnormalities in intracranial EEG, and of potential clinical value to identify pathological tissue in epilepsy. Finally, we make our normative intracranial map publicly available to facilitate future investigations in epilepsy and beyond.

q-bio.NC↗

arXiv2021

Fluctuations in EEG band power at subject-specific timescales over minutes to days explain changes in seizure evolutions

Epilepsy is recognised as a dynamic disease, where both seizure susceptibility and seizure characteristics themselves change over time. Specifically, we recently quantified the variable electrographic spatio-temporal seizure evolutions that exist within individual patients. This variability appears to follow subject-specific circadian, or longer, timescale modulations. It is therefore important to know whether continuously-recorded interictal iEEG features can capture signatures of these modulations over different timescales. In this work, we analyse continuous intracranial electroencephalographic (iEEG) recordings from video-telemetry units and find fluctuations in iEEG band power over timescales ranging from minutes up to twelve days. As expected and in agreement with previous studies, we find that all subjects show a circadian fluctuation in their iEEG band power. We additionally find other fluctuations of similar magnitude on subject-specific timescales. Importantly, we find that a combination of these fluctuations on different timescales can explain changes in seizure evolutions in most subjects above chance level. These results suggest that subject-specific fluctuations in iEEG band power over timescales of minutes to days may serve as markers of seizure modulating processes. We hope that future work can link these detected fluctuations to their biological driver(s). There is a critical need to better understand seizure modulating processes, as this will enable the development of novel treatment strategies that could minimise the seizure spread, duration, or severity and therefore the clinical impact of seizures.

q-bio.NC↗

arXiv2020

Band power modulation through intracranial EEG stimulation and its cross-session consistency

Background: Direct electrical stimulation of the brain through intracranial electrodes is currently used to probe the epileptic brain as part of pre-surgical evaluation, and it is also being considered for therapeutic treatments through neuromodulation. It is still unknown, however, how consistent intracranial direct electrical stimulation responses are across sessions, to allow effective neuromodulation design. Objective: To investigate the cross-session consistency of the electrophysiological effect of electrical stimulation delivered through intracranial EEG. Methods: We analysed data from 79 epilepsy patients implanted with intracranial EEG who underwent brain stimulation as part of a memory experiment. We quantified the effect of stimulation in terms of band power modulation and compared this effect from session to session. As a reference, we applied the same measures during baseline periods. Results: In most sessions, the effect of stimulation on band power could not be distinguished from baseline fluctuations of band power. Stimulation effect was also not consistent across sessions; only a third of the session pairs had a higher consistency than the baseline standards. Cross-session consistency is mainly associated with the strength of positive stimulation effects, and it also tends to be higher when the baseline conditions are more similar between sessions. Conclusion: These findings can inform our practices for designing neuromodulation with greater efficacy when using direct electrical brain stimulation as a therapeutic treatment.

q-bio.NC↗