arXiv subjects

Garance Gourdel

Publications and source records attributed to Garance Gourdel.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2023

Compressed Indexing for Consecutive Occurrences

The fundamental question considered in algorithms on strings is that of indexing, that is, preprocessing a given string for specific queries. By now we have a number of efficient solutions for this problem when the queries ask for an exact occurrence of a given pattern $P$. However, practical applications motivate the necessity of considering more complex queries, for example concerning near occurrences of two patterns. Recently, Bille et al. [CPM 2021] introduced a variant of such queries, called gapped consecutive occurrences, in which a query consists of two patterns $P_{1}$ and $P_{2}$ and a range $[a,b]$, and one must find all consecutive occurrences $(q_1,q_2)$ of $P_{1}$ and $P_{2}$ such that $q_2-q_1 \in [a,b]$. By their results, we cannot hope for a very efficient indexing structure for such queries, even if $a=0$ is fixed (although at the same time they provided a non-trivial upper bound). Motivated by this, we focus on a text given as a straight-line program (SLP) and design an index taking space polynomial in the size of the grammar that answers such queries in time optimal up to polylog factors.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2023

Optimal Square Detection Over General Alphabets

Squares (fragments of the form $xx$, for some string $x$) are arguably the most natural type of repetition in strings. The basic algorithmic question concerning squares is to check if a given string of length $n$ is square-free, that is, does not contain a fragment of such form. Main and Lorentz [J. Algorithms 1984] designed an $\mathcal{O}(n\log n)$ time algorithm for this problem, and proved a matching lower bound assuming the so-called general alphabet, meaning that the algorithm is only allowed to check if two characters are equal. However, their lower bound also assumes that there are $Ω(n)$ distinct symbols in the string. As an open question, they asked if there is a faster algorithm if one restricts the size of the alphabet. Crochemore [Theor. Comput. Sci. 1986] designed a linear-time algorithm for constant-size alphabets, and combined with more recent results his approach in fact implies such an algorithm for linearly-sortable alphabets. Very recently, Ellert and Fischer [ICALP 2021] significantly relaxed this assumption by designing a linear-time algorithm for general ordered alphabets, that is, assuming a linear order on the characters that permits constant time order comparisons. However, the open question of Main and Lorentz from 1984 remained unresolved for general (unordered) alphabets. In this paper, we show that testing square-freeness of a length-$n$ string over general alphabet of size $σ$ can be done with $\mathcal{O}(n\log σ)$ comparisons, and cannot be done with $o(n\log σ)$ comparisons. We complement this result with an $\mathcal{O}(n\log σ)$ time algorithm in the Word RAM model. Finally, we extend the algorithm to reporting all the runs (maximal repetitions) in the same complexity.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2022

Pattern matching under DTW distance

In this work, we consider the problem of pattern matching under the dynamic time warping (DTW) distance motivated by potential applications in the analysis of biological data produced by the third generation sequencing. To measure the DTW distance between two strings, one must "warp" them, that is, double some letters in the strings to obtain two equal-lengths strings, and then sum the distances between the letters in the corresponding positions. When the distances between letters are integers, we show that for a pattern P with m runs and a text T with n runs: 1. There is an O(m + n)-time algorithm that computes all locations where the DTW distance from P to T is at most 1; 2. There is an O(kmn)-time algorithm that computes all locations where the DTW distance from P to T is at most k. As a corollary of the second result, we also derive an approximation algorithm for general metrics on the alphabet.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2021

Compressing and Indexing Aligned Readsets

In this paper we show how to use one or more assembled or partially assembled genome as the basis for a compressed full-text index of its readset. Specifically, we build a labelled tree by taking the assembled genome as a trunk and grafting onto it the reads that align to it, at the starting positions of their alignments. Next, we compute the eXtended Burrows-Wheeler Transform (XBWT) of the resulting labelled tree and build a compressed full-text index on that. Although this index can occasionally return false positives, it is usually much more compact than the alternatives. Following the established practice for datasets with many repetitions, we compare different full-text indices by looking at the number of runs in the transformed strings. For a human Chr19 readset our preliminary experiments show that eliminating separators characters from the EBWT reduces the number of runs by 19\%, from 220 million to 178 million, and using the XBWT reduces it by a further 15\%, to 150 million.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2020

Approximating longest common substring with $k$ mismatches: Theory and practice

In the problem of the longest common substring with $k$ mismatches we are given two strings $X, Y$ and must find the maximal length $\ell$ such that there is a length-$\ell$ substring of $X$ and a length-$\ell$ substring of $Y$ that differ in at most $k$ positions. The length $\ell$ can be used as a robust measure of similarity between $X, Y$. In this work, we develop new approximation algorithms for computing $\ell$ that are significantly more efficient that previously known solutions from the theoretical point of view. Our approach is simple and practical, which we confirm via an experimental evaluation, and is probably close to optimal as we demonstrate via a conditional lower bound.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2018

String Periods in the Order-Preserving Model

The order-preserving model (op-model, in short) was introduced quite recently but has already attracted significant attention because of its applications in data analysis. We introduce several types of periods in this setting (op-periods). Then we give algorithms to compute these periods in time $O(n)$, $O(n\log\log n)$, $O(n \log^2 \log n/\log \log \log n)$, $O(n\log n)$ depending on the type of periodicity. In the most general variant the number of different periods can be as big as $Ω(n^2)$, and a compact representation is needed. Our algorithms require novel combinatorial insight into the properties of such periods.

cs.DS↗