SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Gary P. Misson

Publications and source records attributed to Gary P. Misson.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

The Electrodynamic Basis of Dichroism-Mediated Polarization Perception

Humans see the polarization of light through entoptic percepts arising from the macula's Henle fiber layer, where xanthophyll pigments absorb preferentially across the radiating fibers. From the layer's complex dielectric tensor alone, Maxwell's equations in Berreman $4\times4$ form yield its Mueller matrix, set by four scalars $\{A,B,C,D\}$. Its intensity channel depends only on the dichroic pair $A$ and $B$, which fix the percepts at a maximum contrast $|B|/A\approx0.05$. One relation generates the whole dichroism-mediated family: Haidinger's brushes under a uniform field, their dark arms perpendicular to the $\mathbf{E}$-vector; fractured brushes under spatially varying fields; and $N$-fold brushes under vector-vortex illumination.

physics.med-ph

A unified dielectric-tensor model of macular form birefringence and dichroism

Optical anisotropy of the Henle fiber layer (HFL) underlies two macular polarization phenomena, form birefringence (the macular cross) and dichroism (Haidinger's brushes), which have conventionally been treated as unrelated. We model the HFL as a radial diattenuating retarder and derive a single complex dielectric tensor: effective-medium theory for parallel cylinders gives the real part, and cylindrical averaging of the measured transmembrane xanthophyll tilt gives the imaginary part. The birefringent slow axis is radial and the absorption axis tangential, perpendicular by structural necessity. The model reproduces measured dichroic ratios of 1.04--1.14 for a single calibrated oriented-pigment fraction, and supplies the input parameters for full electromagnetic treatments.

physics.med-ph

Topological Expansion of Boehm's Brushes via Structured Light

We report a novel entoptic phenomenon in which the classical two-lobed Boehm's brushes are transformed into a multi-lobed structure by projecting spin-orbit coupled light onto the human retina. These structured beams, composed of non-separable superpositions of circular polarization and orbital angular momentum (OAM), produce azimuthally modulated entoptic patterns through polarization-dependent scattering in the retina. Unlike Haidinger's brushes, which arise from dichroic absorption in the macula, the observed effect is driven by angular variations in scattering strength relative to the local polarization direction. In regions where scattering centers exhibit polarization orientations that converge toward a common point, their combined contributions reinforce one another, producing brighter and more sharply defined entoptic lobes whose number and orientation vary systematically with the topology of the spin-orbit stimulus. Psychophysical measurements across retinal eccentricities from 0.5$^\circ$ to 4$^\circ$ in eleven participants revealed that contrast detection thresholds decreased exponentially with eccentricity, consistent with polarization-sensitive scattering by isotropic structures in the non-foveal retinal regions. From the psychophysical fits, the mean eccentricity at which the entoptic pattern reached a 50 % threshold was $r_{50} = 1.03^\circ$ with a 95 % confidence interval of [0.72, 1.34]$^\circ$, indicating that the spin-orbit-induced entoptic structure becomes perceptually robust at approximately 1$^\circ$ retinal eccentricity. Together, these findings demonstrate that spin-orbit light modulates scattering-based visual phenomena in previously unrecognized ways, enabling new approaches for probing retinal structure and visual processing using topological features of light.

physics.optics

Historical Context, Scientific Context, and Translation of Haidinger's (1844) Discovery of Naked-Eye Visibility of the Polarization of Light

In 1844, the Austrian mineralogist Wilhelm von Haidinger reported he could see the polarization of light with the naked eye. It appears as a faint, blurry, transient, yellow hourglass shape superimposed on whatever one looks at. It is now commonly called Haidinger's brushes. To our surprise, even though the paper is well cited, we were unable to find a translation of it from its difficult, nineteenth-century German into English. We provide one, with annotations to set the paper into its scientific and historical context.

physics.hist-ph