arXiv subjects

Gaurav Najpande

Publications and source records attributed to Gaurav Najpande.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

SentryLine: Evidence-Grounded Question Answering over Evolving Documents in Oncology Care

Oncology care operates at constant pressure of absorbing rapidly evolving evidence base in biomedicine. The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) addresses this through living guidelines, but the format introduces a new burden: any recommendation can change at any point, across multiple versioned documents. We present SENTRYLINE, a living guideline-aware clinical question answering system. SENTRYLINE retrieves guideline passages through a vectorless hierarchical RAG pipeline and returns a role-specific answer with inline citations, factual and temporal verification reports, and drift detection notes that surface when a guideline has been updated. We construct ASCOBENCH, a benchmark of 405 three-turn conversations across four question categories with gold answers from expert annotators(clinicians), and use test set to evaluate SENTRYLINE against five baselines under an LLM-as-judge framework. Experiments across three generation backbones show consistent improvements over four retrieval baselines and ASCO's guideline assistant, with particularly strong gains on Reasoning and Role-Specific questions where multi-hop synthesis and register adaptation are required

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

DRAGON: A Benchmark for Evidence-Grounded Visual Reasoning over Diagrams

Diagram question answering (DQA) requires models to interpret structured visual representations such as charts, maps, infographics, circuit schematics, and scientific diagrams. Recent vision-language models (VLMs) often achieve high answer accuracy on these tasks, yet correct answers do not guarantee that models ground their reasoning in the diagram regions that support the prediction. Models may instead rely on textual correlations or dataset artifacts without identifying the visual evidence required to verify the answer. This limitation prevents reliable evaluation of diagram reasoning and reduces interpretability. We introduce DRAGON, a benchmark for evaluating evidence-grounded visual reasoning in diagrams. Given a diagram, a question, and the correct answer, a model must predict bounding boxes that correspond to the visual elements required to justify the answer. These evidence regions may include answer-bearing components, textual labels, legends, axes, connectors, and other supporting structures involved in the reasoning process. The DRAGON dataset contains 11,664 annotated question instances collected from six diagram QA datasets: ChartQA, Circuit-VQA, InfographicsVQA, MapIQ, MapWise, and AI2D. We release a 2,445-instance benchmark test set with human-verified reasoning evidence annotations and a standardized evaluation framework. We evaluate eight recent VLMs and analyze their ability to localize reasoning evidence across diverse diagram domains. DRAGON enables systematic evaluation of diagram reasoning and supports future research on models that ground their predictions in visual evidence.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

QUIETT: Query-Independent Table Transformation for Robust Reasoning

Real-world tables often contain schema inconsistencies, heterogeneous value formats, and implicit relational structures that degrade table reasoning and question answering. Existing approaches address these issues at query time, repeating normalization and restructuring for every new question and producing representations that do not generalize to unseen queries. We introduce QuIeTT, a transform-first, query-later framework that converts each raw table into a single SQL-ready canonical representation before any evaluation query is observed, under three constraints: no evaluation query access, information preservation, and single-table reuse. QuIeTT operates through a three-stage pipeline: issue probing, where synthetic queries surface structural deficiencies such as ambiguous schemas and heterogeneous formats; plan generation; and structured execution. Experiments on four benchmarks across five model families show consistent improvements over strong baselines in both direct prompting and agentic reasoning paradigms, with particularly strong gains on a manually annotated challenge set of structurally diverse unseen questions.

cs.CL↗