SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Ge Lv

Publications and source records attributed to Ge Lv.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Unified Disturbance Aware Safe Kinematic Control for Closed-Architecture Robots

In commercial robotic systems, it is common to encounter a closed inner-loop torque controller that is not user-modifiable. However, the outer-loop controller, which sends kinematic commands such as position or velocity for the inner-loop controller to track, is typically exposed to users. In this work, we focus on the development of an easily integrated add-on at the outer-loop layer by combining disturbance rejection control and robust control barrier function for high-performance tracking and safe control of the whole dynamic system of an industrial manipulator. This is particularly beneficial when 1) the inner-loop controller is imperfect, unmodifiable, and uncertain; and 2) the dynamic model exhibits significant uncertainty. Stability analysis, formal safety guarantee proof, and hardware experiments with a PUMA robotic manipulator are presented. Our solution demonstrates superior performance in terms of simplicity of implementation, robustness, tracking precision, and safety compared to the state of the art. A demonstration video is available at https://youtu.be/e0palGVU_50.

cs.RO

Disturbance Rejection-Guarded Learning for Vibration Suppression of Two-Inertia Systems

Model uncertainty presents significant challenges in vibration suppression of multi-inertia systems, as these systems often rely on inaccurate nominal mathematical models due to system identification errors or unmodeled dynamics. An observer, such as an extended state observer (ESO), can estimate the discrepancy between the inaccurate nominal model and the true model, thus improving control performance via disturbance rejection. The conventional observer design is memoryless in the sense that once its estimated disturbance is obtained and sent to the controller, the datum is discarded. In this research, we propose a seamless integration of ESO and machine learning. On one hand, the machine learning model attempts to model the disturbance. With the assistance of prior information about the disturbance, the observer is expected to achieve faster convergence in disturbance estimation. On the other hand, machine learning benefits from an additional assurance layer provided by the ESO, as any imperfections in the machine learning model can be compensated for by the ESO. We validated the effectiveness of this novel learning-for-control paradigm through simulation and physical tests on two-inertial motion control systems used for vibration studies.

eess.SY