arXiv subjects

Gelin Bian

Publications and source records attributed to Gelin Bian.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

A Generative Foundation Model for Multimodal Tokamak Tasks

Tokamak experiments record diverse measurements, including waveforms, profiles, fields, and scalars, which are used to reconstruct the plasma, forecast its evolution, recover associated control signals, and estimate disruption risk. Most models are built separately for one task and a fixed set of inputs and outputs, and each relies on a prescribed subset of diagnostics rather than structuring the full multimodal observation set to extract global, cross-signal information about the discharge. These limitations motivate a reusable foundation model that adapts to each task's input-output schema and models heterogeneous target signals jointly, rather than retraining a separate model for every configuration. In this work, we extend the TokaMark benchmark with two groups of tasks for actuator action inversion and disruption prediction, yielding 20 MAST tasks in six groups with explicit schemas and evaluation protocols. Then, we introduce GenToka, a generative tokamak foundation model that jointly generates schema-selected targets through a shared conditional diffusion Transformer, with signal-specific codecs preserving native time series, profiles, fields, and scalars; foundation pretraining and task-specific adaptation transfer cross-signal structure across all six groups. Evaluation on MAST measurements shows that GenToka reduces macro-average normalized root mean squared error relative to TokaMind by 4.7% on Groups 1-4 and by 17.7% on Group 5, and improves macro-average window-level F1 on Group 6 by 8.4% at a common validation-selected threshold. GenToka provides a reusable, generative, and multimodal pathway for experimental tokamaks, linking plasma-state reconstruction, actuator inference, and disruption warning from shared measurements to support more integrated, data-driven fusion plasma prediction and control research.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

Toward Collective Model Intelligence: Characterizing and Coordinating Models

Independently developed AI models accumulate diverse and complementary capabilities, but a growing model collection does not automatically realize Collective AI. Addressing this gap requires understanding model capabilities with limited evaluation, organizing complementary models to collaborate on diverse tasks, and executing model calls efficiently under resource constraints. We present a systematic approach to pursuing Collective Model Intelligence through three connected components. First, Model Eval constructs evidence-based capability profiles by combining query-level performance estimation with cross-domain prediction, reducing the need for exhaustive evaluation. Second, Mio (Models in One) organizes complementary model candidates and supports task-conditioned, cost-aware selection and collaboration as task requirements evolve. Third, Mos (Model Serving OS) separates model selection from execution and provides endpoint scheduling and shared model deployment and distribution. Experiments show lower capability-estimation errors under limited evaluation. Across nine public benchmarks, Mio 1.0 Lite achieves the highest average score and lowest average cost among compared methods, with per-request costs 73.7-97.5% lower than those of the best-scoring alternatives. A prewarmed shared cache accelerates model-file retrieval by up to 23.3 times. This work lays a foundation for Collective Model Intelligence by characterizing and coordinating the diverse capabilities of an expanding model universe.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

Routing Should Pay for Itself: Sparse Supervision for Economical LLM Routing

Large language model (LLM) routing reduces serving cost by assigning each query to an appropriate model while preserving response quality. Learning such a router, however, often requires executing multiple candidate models on historical queries to collect query--model quality feedback, creating a nontrivial supervision cost before deployment. Existing work largely focuses on serving-time efficiency, overlooking whether the resulting savings are sufficient to recover this upfront expenditure. We further observe that routing quality often saturates well before all query--model feedback is collected, suggesting that dense supervision can be economically over-provisioned. We propose SaveRouter, a sparse-supervision routing framework that selectively acquires informative model feedback and shares capability information across related queries, while retaining query-level refinement for fine-grained routing. We evaluate routing by jointly accounting for supervision expenditure and subsequent serving-time savings. Across four routing benchmarks, the main setting uses only about 33--41% of available training feedback while maintaining competitive or better routing quality, and reduces the break-even deployment volume by approximately 1.9--9.5 times compared with the fastest conventional router. Further analysis shows that acquiring more supervision is not always economically preferable: the supervision level that minimizes serving cost can differ from the one that achieves the earliest payback. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/LAMDA-Model-Reuse/SaveRouter.

cs.AI↗