arXiv subjects

Gema Rodriguez-Perez

Publications and source records attributed to Gema Rodriguez-Perez.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Toward Inclusive AI-Driven Development: Exploring Gender Differences in Code Generation Tool Interactions

The increasing reliance on Code Generation Tools (CGTs), such as Claude Code and GitHub Copilot, is revamping programming workflows and raising critical questions about fairness and inclusivity in human-AI collaboration. While CGTs offer potential productivity enhancements, their effectiveness across diverse user groups have not been sufficiently investigated. We hypothesized that developers' interactions with CGTs vary based on gender, influencing task outcomes and cognitive load, as prior research suggests that gender differences can affect technology use and cognitive processing. This study employed a mixed-subjects design with 39 participants, evenly divided by gender for a counterbalanced design. Participants completed two programming tasks of medium to high difficulty using two distinct treatments: only CGT assistance and only internet access. Task orders and conditions were counterbalanced to mitigate order effects. We collected cognitive load surveys, screen recordings, and task performance metrics such as completion time, code correctness, and CGT interaction behaviors. Our results indicate no statistically significant gender differences in cognitive load or performance outcomes when using CGTs compared to Internet-based workflows. CGTs reduce intrinsic and extraneous cognitive load compared to Internet based workflows, but the reduction was not statistically significantly. However, CGTs improved advanced code correctness. Our results suggest that CGTs can lower cognitive load and enhance performance on complex coding tasks without significantly affecting core correctness or completion time. These findings highlight how CGT usage can reduce cognitive burden and support more equitable programming experiences across users.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2025

Cracking CodeWhisperer: Analyzing Developers' Interactions and Patterns During Programming Tasks

The use of AI code-generation tools is becoming increasingly common, making it important to understand how software developers are adopting these tools. In this study, we investigate how developers engage with Amazon's CodeWhisperer, an LLM-based code-generation tool. We conducted two user studies with two groups of 10 participants each, interacting with CodeWhisperer - the first to understand which interactions were critical to capture and the second to collect low-level interaction data using a custom telemetry plugin. Our mixed-methods analysis identified four behavioral patterns: 1) incremental code refinement, 2) explicit instruction using natural language comments, 3) baseline structuring with model suggestions, and 4) integrative use with external sources. We provide a comprehensive analysis of these patterns .

cs.SE↗

arXiv2025

Making Software Development More Diverse and Inclusive: Key Themes, Challenges, and Future Directions

Introduction: Digital products increasingly reshape industries, influencing human behavior and decision-making. However, the software development teams developing these systems often lack diversity, which may lead to designs that overlook the needs, equal treatment or safety of diverse user groups. These risks highlight the need for fostering diversity and inclusion in software development to create safer, more equitable technology. Method: This research is based on insights from an academic meeting in June 2023 involving 23 software engineering researchers and practitioners. We used the collaborative discussion method 1-2-4-ALL as a systematic research approach and identified six themes around the theme challenges and opportunities to improve Software Developer Diversity and Inclusion (SDDI). We identified benefits, harms, and future research directions for the four main themes. Then, we discuss the remaining two themes, Artificial Intelligence & SDDI and AI & Computer Science education, which have a cross-cutting effect on the other themes. Results: This research explores the key challenges and research opportunities for promoting SDDI, providing a roadmap to guide both researchers and practitioners. We underline that research around SDDI requires a constant focus on maximizing benefits while minimizing harms, especially to vulnerable groups. As a research community, we must strike this balance in a responsible way.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2024

Linking Code and Documentation Churn: Preliminary Analysis

Code churn refers to the measure of the amount of code added, modified, or deleted in a project and is often used to assess codebase stability and maintainability. Program comprehension or how understandable the changes are, is equally important for maintainability. Documentation is crucial for knowledge transfer, especially when new maintainers take over abandoned code. We emphasize the need for corresponding documentation updates, as this reflects project health and trustworthiness as a third-party library. Therefore, we argue that every code change should prompt a documentation update (defined as documentation churn). Linking code churn changes with documentation updates is important for project sustainability, as it facilitates knowledge transfer and reduces the effort required for program comprehension. This study investigates the synchrony between code churn and documentation updates in three GitHub open-source projects. We will use qualitative analysis and repository mining to examine the alignment and correlation of code churn and documentation updates over time. We want to identify which code changes are likely synchronized with documentation and to what extent documentation can be auto-generated. Preliminary results indicate varying degrees of synchrony across projects, highlighting the importance of integrated concurrent documentation practices and providing insights into how recent technologies like AI, in the form of Large Language Models (i.e., LLMs), could be leveraged to keep code and documentation churn in sync. The novelty of this study lies in demonstrating how synchronizing code changes with documentation updates can improve the development lifecycle by enhancing diversity and efficiency.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2021

Watch out for Extrinsic Bugs! A Case Study of their Impact in Just-In-Time Bug Prediction Models on the OpenStack project

Intrinsic bugs are bugs for which a bug introducing change can be identified in the version control system of a software. In contrast, extrinsic bugs are caused by external changes to a software, such as errors in external APIs; thereby they do not have an explicit bug introducing change in the version control system. Although most previous research literature has assumed that all bugs are of intrinsic nature, in a previous study, we show that not all bugs are intrinsic. This paper shows an example of how considering extrinsic bugs can affect software engineering research. Specifically, we study the impact of extrinsic bugs in Just In Time bug prediction by partially replicating a recent study by McIntosh and Kamei on JIT models. These models are trained using properties of earlier bug-introducing changes. Since extrinsic bugs do not have bug introducing changes in the version control system, we manually curate McIntosh and Kamei's dataset to distinguish between intrinsic and extrinsic bugs. Then, we address their original research questions, this time removing extrinsic bugs, to study whether bug-introducing changes are a moving target in Just-In-Time bug prediction. Finally, we study whether characteristics of intrinsic and extrinsic bugs are different. Our results show that intrinsic and extrinsic bugs are of different nature. When removing extrinsic bugs the performance is different up to 16 % Area Under the Curve points. This indicates that our JIT models obtain a more accurate representation of the real world. We conclude that extrinsic bugs negatively impact Just-In-Time models. Furthermore, we offer evidence that extrinsic bugs should be further investigated, as they can significantly impact how software engineers understand bugs.

cs.SE↗