Genesis Argueta | Searcharxiv

arXiv2026

What Happens to Accuracy When Photo Lineups Contain Non-Mated Rank-One Images From Large Galleries?

One-to-many facial identification is commonly used to match a probe image from surveillance video against a gallery of driver's license and/or booking photos. The algorithm's rank-one image from the gallery, or a human examiner's selection from the algorithm's top-ranked images, may then be placed in a photo lineup shown to a witness. Witness selection of the gallery image in the photo lineup may then lead directly to the person in the gallery image being arrested. This facial identification process is involved in a number of wrongful arrests. This work specifically examines whether the probability of a witness making an incorrect identification increases with the size of the gallery searched. We compare photo lineup accuracy when the "suspect" image is drawn from galleries of 500, 5,000, and 24,000 images. We find that larger galleries increase both the likelihood of a witness making an incorrect identification and their confidence in that (incorrect) identification. These results raise questions of whether an image resulting from such a facial identification process should be used in photo lineups and of whether results of a photo lineup alone should constitute probable cause for arrest.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2024

Goldilocks Test Sets for Face Verification

Reported face verification accuracy has reached a plateau on current well-known test sets. As a result, some difficult test sets have been assembled by reducing the image quality or adding artifacts to the image. However, we argue that test sets can be challenging without artificially reducing the image quality because the face recognition (FR) models suffer from correctly recognizing 1) the pairs from the same identity (i.e., genuine pairs) with a large face attribute difference, 2) the pairs from different identities (i.e., impostor pairs) with a small face attribute difference, and 3) the pairs of similar-looking identities (e.g., twins and relatives). We propose three challenging test sets to reveal important but ignored weaknesses of the existing FR algorithms. To challenge models on variation of facial attributes, we propose Hadrian and Eclipse to address facial hair differences and face exposure differences. The images in both test sets are high-quality and collected in a controlled environment. To challenge FR models on similar-looking persons, we propose ND-Twins, which contains images from a dedicated twins dataset. The LFW test protocol is used to structure the proposed test sets. Moreover, we introduce additional rules to assemble ``Goldilocks\footnote{https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldilocks_and_the_Three_Bears}" level test sets, including 1) restricted number of occurrence of hard samples, 2) equal chance evaluation across demographic groups, and 3) constrained identity overlap across validation folds. Quantitatively, without further processing the images, the proposed test sets have on-par or higher difficulties than the existing test sets that add artifacts to the images. The datasets are available at: https://github.com/HaiyuWu/SOTA-Face-Recognition-Train-and-Test.

cs.CV↗