arXiv subjects

George B. Field

Publications and source records attributed to George B. Field.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2023

Axions and Cosmic Magnetic Fields

We argue that if axions are the dark matter, their coupling to electromagnetism results in exponential growth of a helical magnetic field when the axion field first rolls down its potential. After an inverse cascade, the relevant length scales to day are of order 10-100 kpc, of astrophysical interest. Our mechanism for allowing the field to grow relies on a nuance of MHD. Faraday's Law says that an electric field is needed to create a magnetic field. Previous authors relied on conventional Ohm's law to calculate E, but the resistivity is negligible and therefore they assume E is as well. We use a modified Ohm's Law that includes the effects of self-induction in limiting the current driven by a given E, which allows a magnetic field to grow.

hep-ph↗

arXiv2020

A Turbulent-Entropic Instability and the Fragmentation of Star-Forming Clouds

The kinetic energy of supersonic turbulence within interstellar clouds is subject to cooling by dissipation in shocks and subsequent line radiation. The clouds are therefore susceptible to a condensation process controlled by the specific entropy. In a form analogous to the thermodynamic entropy, the entropy for supersonic turbulence is proportional to the log of the product of the mean turbulent velocity and the size scale. We derive a dispersion relation for the growth of entropic instabilities in a spherical self-gravitating cloud and find that there is a critical maximum dissipation time scale, about equal to the crossing time, that allows for fragmentation and subsequent star formation. However, the time scale for the loss of turbulent energy may be shorter or longer, for example with rapid thermal cooling or the injection of mechanical energy. Differences in the time scale for energy loss in different star-forming regions may result in differences in the outcome, for example, in the initial mass function.

astro-ph.GA↗

arXiv2008

Dimensionless Measures of Turbulent Magnetohydrodynamic Dissipation Rates

The magnetic Reynolds number R_M, is defined as the product of a characteristic scale and associated flow speed divided by the microphysical magnetic diffusivity. For laminar flows, R_M also approximates the ratio of advective to dissipative terms in the total magnetic energy equation, but for turbulent flows this latter ratio depends on the energy spectra and approaches unity in a steady state. To generalize for flows of arbitrary spectra we define an effective magnetic dissipation number, R_{M,e}, as the ratio of the advection to microphysical dissipation terms in the total magnetic energy equation, incorporating the full spectrum of scales, arbitrary magnetic Prandtl numbers, and distinct pairs of inner and outer scales for magnetic and kinetic spectra. As expected, for a substantial parameter range R_{M,e}\sim {O}(1) << R_M. We also distinguish R_{M,e} from {\tilde R}_{M,e} where the latter is an effective magnetic Reynolds number for the mean magnetic field equation when a turbulent diffusivity is explicitly imposed as a closure. That R_{M,e} and {\tilde R}_{M,e} approach unity even if R_M>>1 highlights that, just as in hydrodynamic turbulence,energy dissipation of large scale structures in turbulent flows via a cascade can be much faster than the dissipation of large scale structures in laminar flows. This illustrates that the rate of energy dissipation by magnetic reconnection is much faster in turbulent flows, and much less sensitive to microphysical reconnection rates compared to laminar flows.

astro-ph↗

arXiv2007

A Model of Cloud Fragmentation

We present a model in which the supersonic motions observed in molecular clouds are driven by gravitational energy released as large structures fragment into smaller ones. The fragmentation process begins in large molecular clouds, and continues down to fragments of a critical mass, at which gravitational confinement may be replaced by pressure confinement. The power laws that describe the scaling of density and mass, and number spectra and mass spectra of the fragments are given in terms of that of the observed velocity dispersion of the fragments. The results agree reasonably well with observations over the range from several to about a third of a million solar masses.

astro-ph↗

arXiv2005

On the Meaning and Inapplicability of the Zeldovich Relations of Magnetohydrodynamics

Considering a plasma with an initially weak large scale field subject to nonhelical turbulent stirring, Zeldovich (1957), for two-dimensions, followed by others for three dimensions, and Zeldovich et al. (1983) have presented formulae of the form $ =f(R_M){Bbar}^2$. Such ``Zeldovich relations'' have sometimes been interpreted to provide steady-state relations between the energy associated with the fluctuating magnetic field and that associated with a large scale or mean field multiplied by a function $f$ that depends on spatial dimension and a magnetic Reynolds number $R_M$. Here we dissect the origin of these relations and pinpoint pitfalls that show why they are inapplicable to realistic, dynamical MHD turbulence and that they disagree with many numerical simulations. For 2-D, we show that when the total magnetic field is determined by a vector potential, the standard Zeldovich relation applies only transiently, characterizing a maximum possible value that the field energy can reach before necessarily decaying. in relation to a seed value $Bbar$. In 3-D, we show that the standard Zeldovich relations are derived by balancing subdominant terms. In contrast, balancing the dominant terms shows that the fluctuating field can grow to a value independent of $R_M$ and the initially imposed $Bbar$, as seen in numerical simulations. We also emphasize that these Zeldovich relations of nonhelical turbulence imply nothing about the amount mean field growth in a helical dynamo. In short, by re-analyzing the origin of the Zeldovich relations, we highlight that they are inapplicable to realistic steady-states of large $R_M$ MHD turbulence.

astro-ph↗

arXiv2004

Dynamical magnetic relaxation: A nonlinear magnetically driven dynamo

A non-linear, time-dependent, magnetically driven dynamo theory which shows how magnetically dominated configurations can relax to become helical on the largest scale available is presented. Coupled time-dependent differential equations for large scale magnetic helicity, small scale magnetic helicity, velocity, and the electromotive force are solved. The magnetic helicity on small scales relaxes to drive significant large scale helical field growth on dynamical (Alfvén crossing) time scales, independent of the magnitude of finite microphysical transport coefficients, after which the growing kinetic helicity slows the growth to a viscously limited pace. This magnetically driven dynamo complements the nonlinear kinetic helicity driven dynamo; for the latter, the growing magnetic helicity fluctuations suppress, rather than drive, large scale magnetic helicity growth. A unified set of equations accommodates both types of dynamos.

astro-ph↗

arXiv2003

A New Approach to Turbulent Transport of a Mean Scalar

We develop a simple mean field approach to the transport of a passive scalar for which the fundamental equation is a second order differential equation in the transported quantity, not a first order equation. Triple correlations are included, as they must be for any realistic description of turbulence. No correlation time enters the theory, only an eddy turnover time. The approach is simpler than standard approaches which incorporate triple correlations, but more realistic than Gaussian or short correlation time closures which do not. A similar approach has proven useful in magnetohydrodynamics.

astro-ph↗

arXiv2002

A New Dynamical Mean-Field Dynamo Theory and Closure Approach

We develop a new nonlinear mean field dynamo theory that couples field growth to the time evolution of the magnetic helicity and the turbulent electromotive force, $\emfb$. We show that the difference between kinetic and current helicities emerges naturally as the growth driver when the time derivative of $\emfb$ is coupled into the theory. The solutions predict significant field growth in a kinematic phase and a saturation rate/strength that is magnetic Reynolds number dependent/independent in agreement with numerical simulations. The amplitude of early time oscillations provides a diagnostic for the closure.

astro-ph↗

arXiv2002

Dynamical Quenching of the $α^2$ Dynamo

We present a two-scale approximation for the dynamics of a nonlinear $α^2$ dynamo. Solutions of the resulting nonlinear equations agree with the numerical simulations of Brandenburg (2001), and show that $α$ is quenched by the buildup of magnetic helicity at the forcing scale $1/k_2$ as the $α$ effect transfers it from the large scale $1/k_1$. For times $t > (k_1/k_2)R_{M,2}$ in eddy turnover units (where $R_{M,2}$ is the magnetic Reynolds number of the forcing scale), $α$ is resistively limited in the form predicted for the steady-state case. However, for $t << R_{M,2}$, $α$ takes on its kinematic value, independent of $R_{M,2}$, allowing the production of large-scale magnetic energy equal to $k_1/k_2$ times equipartition. Thus the dynamic theory of $α$ predicts substantial "fast" growth of large-scale field despite being "slow" at large times.

astro-ph↗

arXiv2001

Conservation of Magnetic Helicity and Its Constraint on $α$-Effect of Dynamo Theory

Dynamical studies of MHD turbulence on the one hand, and arguments based upon magnetic helicity on the other, have yielded seemingly contradictory estimates for the $α$ parameter in turbulent dynamo theory. Here we show, with direct numerical simulation of three-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic turbulence with a mean magnetic field, $\OB$, that the constraint on the dynamo $α$-effect set by the magnetic helicity is time-dependent. A time-scale $t_c$ is introduced such that for $t - < \b \cdot \nabla \times \b >)$; for $t>t_c$, the classical result of the $α$-coefficient given by the Mean-Field Electrodynamics is reduced by a factor of $1/({R_m |\OB|^2/v_{rms}^2})$, as argued by Gruzinov & Diamond, Seehafer and Cattaneo & Hughes. Here, $R_m$ is the magnetic Reynolds number, $v_{rms}$ the rms velocity of the turbulence, $τ_{cor}$ the correlation time of the turbulence, and $\overline B$ is in velocity unit. The applicability of and connection between different models of dynamo theory are also discussed.

astro-ph↗

arXiv2000

How astrophysical mean field dynamos can circumvent existing quenching constraints

Mean field dynamo theory is a leading candidate to explain the observed large scale magnetic fields of galaxies and stars. However, controversy arises over the extent of premature quenching by the backreaction of the growing field. We distinguish between rapid mean field dynamo action, which is required by astrophysical systems, and resistively limited action. We show how the flow of magnetic helicity is important for rapid action. Existing numerical and analytic work suggesting that mean field dynamos are prematurely quenched and resistively limited include approximations or boundary conditions which suppress the magnetic helicity flow from the outset. Thus they do not unambiguously reveal whether real astrophysical mean field dynamos are dynamically suppressed when the helicity flow is allowed. An outflow of helicity also implies an outflow of magnetic energy and so active coronae or winds should accompany mean field dynamos. Open boundaries alone may not be sufficient for rapid dynamo action and the additional physics of buoyancy and outflows may be required. Possible simulation approaches to test some of the principles are briefly discussed. Some limitations of the ``Zeldovich relation'' are also addressed.

astro-ph↗

arXiv2000

Cosmological Magnetic Fields from Primordial Helicity

Primordial magnetic fields may account for all or part of the fields observed in galaxies. We consider the evolution of the magnetic fields created by pseudoscalar effects in the early universe. Such processes can create force-free fields of maximal helicity; we show that for such a field magnetic energy inverse cascades to larger scales than it would have solely by flux freezing and cosmic expansion. For fields generated at the electroweak phase transition, we find that the predicted wavelength today can in principle be as large as 10 kpc, and the field strength can be as large as 10^{-10} G.

astro-ph↗

arXiv2000

Mean Field Dynamo Saturation: Toward Understanding Conflicting Results

Mean field dynamos may explain the origin of large scale magnetic fields of galaxies, but controversy arises over the extent of dynamo quenching by the growing field. Here we explain how apparently conflicting results may be mutually consistent, by showing the role of magnetic helicity conservation and boundary terms usually neglected. We estimate the associated magnetic energy flowing out of the Galaxy but emphasize that the mechanism of field escape needs to be addressed.

astro-ph↗

arXiv1999

Constraints on the magnitude of alpha in dynamo theory

We consider the backreaction of the magnetic field on the magnetic dynamo coefficients and the role of boundary conditions in interpreting whether numerical evidence for suppression is dynamical. If a uniform field in a periodic box serves as the initial condition for modeling the backreaction on the turbulent EMF, then the magnitude of the turbulent EMF and thus the dynamo coefficient $\a$, have a stringent upper limit that depends on the magnetic Reynolds number $R_M$ to a power of order -1. This is not a dynamic suppression but results just because of the imposed boundary conditions. In contrast, when mean field gradients are allowed within the simulation region, or non-periodic boundary are used, the upper limit is independent of $R_M$ and takes its kinematic value. Thus only for simulations of the latter types could a measured suppression be the result of a dynamic backreaction. This is fundamental for understanding a long-standing controversy surrounding $α$ suppression. Numerical simulations which do not allow any field gradients and invoke periodic boundary conditions appear to show a strong $α$ suppression (e.g. Cattaneo & Hughes 1996). Simulations of accretion discs which allow field gradients and allow free boundary conditions (Brandenburg & Donner 1997) suggest a dynamo $α$ which is not suppressed by a power of $R_M$. Our results are consistent with both types of simulations.

astro-ph↗

arXiv1999

Coronal activity as a consequence of dynamos in astrophysical rotators

We show that the presence of a steady $\ao$ dynamo in astrophysical rotators likely leads to an outflow of relative magnetic helicity and thus magnetic energy available for particle acceleration in a corona. The connection between energy and magnetic helicity arises because the generation of large scale field is linked to a generation of large scale magnetic helicity. In a steady state, the relative magnetic helicity associated with the large scale field can escape, accompanied by an equal and opposite small scale contribution from the field, since the total magnetic helicity in large magnetic Reynolds number flows is conserved. From the helicity flow, a lower limit on the magnetic energy deposited in the corona can be estimated. Steady coronal activity and the dissipation of magnetic energy is therefore a signature of an internal dynamo. Our theoretical estimate of the power delivered by a mean field dynamo is consistent with that inferred from observations to be delivered to the solar corona, the Galactic corona, and Seyfert I AGN coronae.

astro-ph↗

arXiv1999

Resolution of an ambiguity in dynamo theory and its consequences for back reaction studies

An unsolved problem in turbulent dynamo theory is the ``back reaction'' problem: to what degree does the mean magnetic field suppress the turbulent dynamo coefficients which are needed to drive its growth? The answer will ultimately derive from a combination of numerical and analytical studies. Here we show that analytic approaches to the dynamo and back reaction problems require one to separate turbulent quantities into two components: those influenced by the mean field (which are therefore anisotropic) and those independent of the mean field (and are therefore isotropic), no matter how weak the mean field is. Upon revising the standard formalism to meet this requirement, we find that: (1) The two types of components often appear in the same equation, so that standard treatments, which do not distinguish between them, are ambiguous. (2) The usual first-order smoothing approximation that is necessary to make progress in the standard treatment is unnecessary when the distinction is made. (3) In contrast to previous suggestions, the correction to the dynamo $\a$ coefficient found by Pouquet et al (1976) is actually independent of the mean field, and therefore cannot be interpreted as a quenching.

astro-ph↗

arXiv1998

Nonlinear Alpha Effect in Dynamo Theory

We extend the standard two-scale theory of the turbulent dynamo coefficient $α$ to include the nonlinear back reaction of the mean field $\bar B$ on the turbulence. We calculate the turbulent emf as a power series in $\bar B$, assuming that the base state of the turbulence ($\bar B=0$) is isotropic, and, for simplicity, that the magnetic diffusivity equals the kinematic viscosity. The power series converges for all $\bar B$, and for the special case that the spectrum of the turbulence is sharply peaked in $k$, our result is proportional to a tabulated function of the magnetic Reynolds number $R_M$ and the ratio $β$ of $\bar B$ (in velocity units) to the rms turbulent velocity $v_0$. For $β\to 0$ (linear regime) we recover the results of Steenbeck et al. (1966) as modified by Pouquet et al. (1976). For $R_M\gg 1$, the usual astrophysical case, $α$ starts to decrease at $β\sim 1$, dropping like $β^{-2}$ as $β\to \infty$. Hence for large $R_M$, $α$ saturates at $\bar B\sim v_0$, as estimated by Kraichnan (1979), rather than at $\bar B\sim R^{-1/2}_Mv_0$, as inferred by Cattaneo and Hughes (1996) from their numerical simulations at $R_M$=100. We plan to carry out simulations with various values of $R_M$ to investigate the discrepency.

astro-ph↗

arXiv1998

Primordial Magnetic Fields that Last?

The magnetic fields we observe in galaxies today may have their origins in the very early universe. While a number of mechanisms have been proposed which lead to an appreciable field amplitude at early times, the subsequent evolution of the field is of crucial importance, especially whether the correlation length of the field can grow as large as the size of a protogalaxy. This talk is a report on work in progress, in which we consider the fate of one specific primordial field scenario, driven by pseudoscalar effects near the electroweak phase transition. We argue that such a scenario has a number of attractive features, although it is still uncertain whether a field of appropriate size can survive until late times.

astro-ph↗