arXiv subjects

Geraldo F. Oliveira

Publications and source records attributed to Geraldo F. Oliveira.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

PipeDRAM: A Data-Transposition-Free Processing-Using-DRAM Architecture with Hardware/Software Pipelining

Processing-using-DRAM (PUD) architectures exploit the analog operational properties of DRAM to perform bulk bitwise Boolean and arithmetic operations inside memory arrays by organizing data in a vertical layout, where operand bits are stacked along DRAM columns. However, modern computing systems natively employ a horizontal data layout that preserves the cache line abstraction, leverages spatial locality in row buffers, and enables high memory throughput. This fundamental mismatch forces existing PUD architectures to frequently perform data layout transformations between horizontal and vertical formats, incurring significant performance, energy, and system integration overheads. Our goal is to eliminate data transposition overheads in PUD systems at low cost. To this end, we propose PipeDRAM, a PUD architecture that eliminates the need for runtime data layout transformation, enabling PUD operations directly over horizontally laid-out data. PipeDRAM's key ideas are to (i) deterministically reorganize bits inside each memory request to enable a PUD-friendly data placement within a DRAM array in a horizontal data layout, and (ii) employ a pipeline-based execution model that overlaps bit-dependent and bit-independent in-DRAM operations to exploit bit-level parallelism across the memory array. We compare PipeDRAM to different computing platforms. PipeDRAM provides (i) 11.8x, 11.8x, and 80.4x higher performance and (ii) 25.4x, 3.0x, and 38.0x lower energy consumption than three state-of-the-art PUD systems. PipeDRAM incurs low area cost on top of a DRAM chip (1.86%) and CPU die (0.05%). To enable further research on PUD systems, we open-source PipeDRAM at https://github.com/CMU-SAFARI/PipeDRAM.

cs.AR↗

arXiv2026

FLINT: Efficiently Leveraging High Bandwidth Flash for Capacity-Scalable LLM Inference Acceleration

LLM inference is increasingly constrained by accelerator memory capacity rather than compute throughput. This constraint is especially acute in single-accelerator and small-node inference systems, where limited on-package memory capacity restricts the size of deployable models. HBF is an emerging 3D-stacked NAND flash technology that provides multi-terabyte near-accelerator capacity, making it a promising capacity tier for storing LLM weights. However, existing HBF-based proposals face three adoption challenges: they (1) rely on coarse-grained static prefetching for LLM weights aiming to hide the microsecond-level read latency of the NAND flash device while maximizing HBF's read throughput, (2) expose NAND flash management tasks (e.g., refresh operations) to the accelerator-visible critical inference path, and (3) miss optimization opportunities to specialize and optimize the flash-management mechanisms to the workload behavior. Our goal is to design an efficient HBF substrate that integrates HBF as a memory-capacity tier alongside HBM while addressing these three challenges. To this end, we propose FLINT, a workload-driven HBF substrate for capacity-scalable LLM inference. FLINT introduces three mechanisms: (1) a hardware burst-buffer controller that dynamically coalesces and pipelines HBF reads aiming to utilize existing NAND flash buffers while sustaining high HBF bandwidth, (2) a phantom-plane refresh mechanism, which removes refresh from the critical inference path by moving refresh-related NAND flash operations outside the read foreground back via low-cost resource duplication, and (3) a read-only FTL, which replaces SSD-class support for arbitrary writes with a compact table that translates logical weight bursts to physical HBF locations.

cs.AR↗

arXiv2026

RevaMp3D: Architecting the Processor Core and Cache Hierarchy for Systems with Monolithically-Integrated Logic and Memory

Recent nano-technological advances enable the Monolithic 3D (M3D) integration of multiple memory and logic layers in a single chip, allowing for fine-grained connections between layers and significantly alleviating main memory bottlenecks. We show for a variety of workloads, on a state-of-the-art M3D-based system, that the performance and energy bottlenecks shift from main memory to the processor core and cache hierarchy. Therefore, there is a need to revisit current designs that have been conventionally tailored to tackle the memory bottleneck. Based on the insights from our design space exploration, we propose RevaMp3D, introducing five key changes. First, we propose removing the shared last-level cache, as this delivers speedups comparable to or exceeding those from increasing its size or reducing its latency across all workloads. Second, since improving L1 cache latency has a large impact on performance, we reduce L1 latency by leveraging an M3D layout to shorten its wires. Third, we repurpose the area from the removed cache to widen and scale up pipeline structures, accommodating more in-flight requests that are efficiently served by M3D memory. To avoid latency penalties from these larger structures, we leverage M3D layouts. Fourth, to facilitate high thread-level parallelism, we propose a new fine-grained synchronization technique, using M3D's dense inter-layer connectivity. Fifth, we leverage the M3D main memory to mitigate the core bottlenecks. We propose a processor frontend design that memoizes the repetitive fetched, decoded, and reordered instructions, stores them in main memory, and turns off the relevant parts of the core when possible. RevaMp3D provides 1.2x-2.9x speedup and 1.2x-1.4x energy reduction compared to a state-of-the-art M3D system. We also analyze RevaMp3D's design decisions across various memory latencies to facilitate latency-aware design decisions.

cs.AR↗

arXiv2026

Clutch: High Performance Vector-Scalar Comparison using DRAM via Chunked Temporal Coding

Vector-scalar comparison is a fundamental computation primitive that compares each element in a vector against a single scalar value. It is widely used in various data-intensive workloads from databases to machine learning. Due to its low computational intensity, its execution tends to be memory-bound, limiting the utilization of compute resources. Processing-using-DRAM (PuD) is an emerging computing paradigm that performs massively parallel bitwise operations directly inside DRAM arrays, alleviating off-chip data movement. Existing PuD-based approaches require many DRAM commands because the comparison's algorithmic complexity grows with operand bit-width in the bit-serial execution model. This command overhead becomes the dominant bottleneck, limiting application-level speedup. We propose Clutch, a data representation and comparison algorithm that accelerates vector-scalar comparisons in PuD systems with high efficiency and scalability. Clutch first uses temporal coding, encoding each vector value as a sequence of leading ones, which enables lookup-based comparison against a scalar by accessing the corresponding DRAM row. To avoid the prohibitive memory footprint of lookup tables at high precision, Clutch partitions operands into multiple multi-bit chunks, compares chunks independently using compact lookup tables, and merges the per-chunk results with a PuD-efficient procedure. By adjusting the number of chunks, Clutch provides a flexible tradeoff between throughput and memory usage. Across predicate evaluation and decision tree inference, Clutch improves end-to-end application throughput and energy efficiency by an average of 12x and 69x over highly optimized CPU and GPU execution, and by 2.9x and 3.0x over the state-of-the-art bit-serial PuD implementation. We also present the first mapping of decision tree inference to PuD execution, extending PuD to a new application domain.

cs.AR↗

arXiv2026

Extended Abstract: Re-Evaluating the Real-System Modeling Accuracy of Ramulator 2.0

Cycle-level DRAM simulators provide accurate and flexible models for DRAM and memory controller operations and enable research on current and future memory systems. Therefore, they are critical for improving the performance, efficiency, and robustness of DRAM-based memory systems. Ramulator 2.0 (successor of Ramulator) is a highly modular and extensible cycle-accurate DRAM simulator that enables rapid exploration of new ideas in DRAM-based memory systems. A MICRO 2024 best paper runner-up publication, A Mess of Memory System Benchmarking, Simulation and Application Profiling, which we refer to as "the Mess paper," with all three artifact badges awarded (including "Reproducible"), proposes a new benchmark to evaluate real and simulated memory system performance. While doing so, it makes strong negative claims about Ramulator 2.0 and shows unexpected results. In this talk and the associated extended abstract, we demonstrate that these results and claims in the Mess paper are incorrect and are due to configuration and simulator usage errors made in the Mess paper. We describe four best practices to aid users and developers of simulation tools to avoid such issues in the future. We emphasize the importance of contacting simulator authors and developers when unexpected results are observed (especially and importantly before publishing such results), to ensure these simulators are used with correct configurations and as intended. Our investigation also aims to stimulate discussion on artifact evaluation practices and on mechanisms for correcting results and artifacts after publication. To aid future works and reproduction of all our results, we open source all our code and scripts at https://github.com/CMU-SAFARI/Cleaning-up-the-Mess. We refer the reader to our full ISPASS 2026 paper and its artifact for the complete analysis, detailed methodology, and extended results.

cs.AR↗

arXiv2026

Cleaning up the Mess: Re-Evaluating the Real-System Modeling Accuracy of Ramulator 2.0

A MICRO 2024 best paper runner-up publication (the Mess paper) with all three artifact badges awarded (including ``Reproducible'') proposes a new benchmark to evaluate real and simulated memory system performance. The publication contends that Ramulator 2.0 and DAMOV (ZSim+Ramulator) (along with other existing memory system simulators) ``poorly resemble the actual system performance'' and asserts that their simulator is better. In this paper, we show that the Mess paper has 1) demonstrable technical misconfigurations, 2) methodological errors in interpreting simulation statistics, and 3) an incomplete artifact that makes its key results irreproducible. We demonstrate that the Ramulator 2.0 simulation results reported in the Mess paper are incorrect due to multiple configuration errors instead of inherent simulation inaccuracy claimed by the Mess paper. We show that by correctly configuring Ramulator 2.0, Ramulator 2.0's simulated memory system performance actually resembles real system characteristics well, and thus a key claimed contribution of the Mess paper is factually incorrect. We also identify that the DAMOV simulation results in the Mess paper use wrong simulation statistics that are unrelated to the simulated DRAM performance. We show that DAMOV's simulated DRAM latency is not constant, in contrast to the Mess paper's claim. Moreover, the Mess paper's artifact repository lacks the necessary sources to fully reproduce all the Mess paper's results. We find that the experiment scripts use simulator executables and other resources that are neither described in the Mess paper nor found in the artifact repository. We strongly encourage the computer architecture community to consider our corrections to the Ramulator 2.0 and DAMOV results of the Mess paper to prevent the propagation of inaccurate and misleading results and to maintain the reliability of the scientific record.

cs.AR↗

arXiv2025

In-DRAM True Random Number Generation Using Simultaneous Multiple-Row Activation: An Experimental Study of Real DRAM Chips

In this work, we experimentally demonstrate that it is possible to generate true random numbers at high throughput and low latency in commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) DRAM chips by leveraging simultaneous multiple-row activation (SiMRA) via an extensive characterization of 96 DDR4 DRAM chips. We rigorously analyze SiMRA's true random generation potential in terms of entropy, latency, and throughput for varying numbers of simultaneously activated DRAM rows (i.e., 2, 4, 8, 16, and 32), data patterns, temperature levels, and spatial variations. Among our 11 key experimental observations, we highlight four key results. First, we evaluate the quality of our TRNG designs using the commonly-used NIST statistical test suite for randomness and find that all SiMRA-based TRNG designs successfully pass each test. Second, 2-, 8-, 16-, and 32-row activation-based TRNG designs outperform the state-of-theart DRAM-based TRNG in throughput by up to 1.15x, 1.99x, 1.82x, and 1.39x, respectively. Third, SiMRA's entropy tends to increase with the number of simultaneously activated DRAM rows. Fourth, operational parameters and conditions (e.g., data pattern and temperature) significantly affect entropy. For example, for most of the tested modules, the average entropy of 32-row activation is 2.51x higher than that of 2-row activation. For example, increasing the temperature from 50°C to 90°C decreases SiMRA's entropy by 1.53x for 32-row activation. To aid future research and development, we open-source our infrastructure at https://github.com/CMU-SAFARI/SiMRA-TRNG.

cs.AR↗

arXiv2025

Chronus: Understanding and Securing the Cutting-Edge Industry Solutions to DRAM Read Disturbance

We 1) present the first rigorous security, performance, energy, and cost analyses of the state-of-the-art on-DRAM-die read disturbance mitigation method, Per Row Activation Counting (PRAC) and 2) propose Chronus, a new mechanism that addresses PRAC's two major weaknesses. Our analysis shows that PRAC's system performance overhead on benign applications is non-negligible for modern DRAM chips and prohibitively large for future DRAM chips that are more vulnerable to read disturbance. We identify two weaknesses of PRAC that cause these overheads. First, PRAC increases critical DRAM access latency parameters due to the additional time required to increment activation counters. Second, PRAC performs a constant number of preventive refreshes at a time, making it vulnerable to an adversarial access pattern, known as the wave attack, and consequently requiring it to be configured for significantly smaller activation thresholds. To address PRAC's two weaknesses, we propose a new on-DRAM-die RowHammer mitigation mechanism, Chronus. Chronus 1) updates row activation counters concurrently while serving accesses by separating counters from the data and 2) prevents the wave attack by dynamically controlling the number of preventive refreshes performed. Our performance analysis shows that Chronus's system performance overhead is near-zero for modern DRAM chips and very low for future DRAM chips. Chronus outperforms three variants of PRAC and three other state-of-the-art read disturbance solutions. We discuss Chronus's and PRAC's implications for future systems and foreshadow future research directions. To aid future research, we open-source our Chronus implementation at https://github.com/CMU-SAFARI/Chronus.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2025

New Tools, Programming Models, and System Support for Processing-in-Memory Architectures

Our goal in this dissertation is to provide tools, programming models, and system support for PIM architectures (with a focus on DRAM-based solutions), to ease the adoption of PIM in current and future systems. To this end, we make at least four new major contributions. First, we introduce DAMOV, the first rigorous methodology to characterize memory-related data movement bottlenecks in modern workloads, and the first data movement benchmark suite. Second, we introduce MIMDRAM, a new hardware/software co-designed substrate that addresses the major current programmability and flexibility limitations of the bulk bitwise execution model of processing-using-DRAM (PUD) architectures. MIMDRAM enables the allocation and control of only the needed computing resources inside DRAM for PUD computing. Third, we introduce Proteus, the first hardware framework that addresses the high execution latency of bulk bitwise PUD operations in state-of-the-art PUD architectures by implementing a data-aware runtime engine for PUD. Proteus reduces the latency of PUD operations in three different ways: (i) Proteus concurrently executes independent in-DRAM primitives belong to a single PUD operation across DRAM arrays. (ii) Proteus dynamically reduces the bit-precision (and consequentially the latency and energy consumption) of PUD operations by exploiting narrow values (i.e., values with many leading zeros or ones). (iii) Proteus chooses and uses the most appropriate data representation and arithmetic algorithm implementation for a given PUD instruction transparently to the programmer. Fourth, we introduce DaPPA (data-parallel processing-in-memory architecture), a new programming framework that eases programmability for general-purpose PNM architectures by allowing the programmer to write efficient PIM-friendly code without the need to manage hardware resources explicitly.

cs.AR↗

arXiv2025

MARS: Processing-In-Memory Acceleration of Raw Signal Genome Analysis Inside the Storage Subsystem

Raw signal genome analysis (RSGA) has emerged as a promising approach to enable real-time genome analysis by directly analyzing raw electrical signals. However, rapid advancements in sequencing technologies make it increasingly difficult for software-based RSGA to match the throughput of raw signal generation. This paper demonstrates that while hardware acceleration techniques can significantly accelerate RSGA, the high volume of genomic data shifts the performance and energy bottleneck from computation to I/O data movement. As sequencing throughput increases, I/O overhead becomes the main contributor to both runtime and energy consumption. Therefore, there is a need to design a high-performance, energy-efficient system for RSGA that can both alleviate the data movement bottleneck and provide large acceleration capabilities. We propose MARS, a storage-centric system that leverages the heterogeneous resources within modern storage systems (e.g., storage-internal DRAM, storage controller, flash chips) alongside their large storage capacity to tackle both data movement and computational overheads of RSGA in an area-efficient and low-cost manner. MARS accelerates RSGA through a novel hardware/software co-design approach. First, MARS modifies the RSGA pipeline via two filtering mechanisms and a quantization scheme, reducing hardware demands and optimizing for in-storage execution. Second, MARS accelerates the RSGA steps directly within the storage by leveraging both Processing-Near-Memory and Processing-Using-Memory paradigms. Third, MARS orchestrates the execution of all steps to fully exploit in-storage parallelism and minimize data movement. Our evaluation shows that MARS outperforms basecalling-based software and hardware-accelerated state-of-the-art read mapping pipelines by 93x and 40x, on average across different datasets, while reducing their energy consumption by 427x and 72x.

cs.AR↗

arXiv2025

Proteus: Enabling High-Performance Processing-Using-DRAM with Dynamic Bit-Precision, Adaptive Data Representation, and Flexible Arithmetic

Processing-using-DRAM (PUD) is a paradigm where the analog operational properties of DRAM are used to perform bulk logic operations. While PUD promises high throughput at low energy and area cost, we uncover three limitations of existing PUD approaches that lead to significant inefficiencies: (i) static data representation, i.e., two's complement with fixed bit-precision, leading to unnecessary computation over useless (i.e., inconsequential) data; (ii) support for only throughput-oriented execution, where the high latency of individual PUD operations can only be hidden in the presence of bulk data-level parallelism; and (iii) high latency for high-precision (e.g., 32-bit) operations. To address these issues, we propose Proteus, the first hardware framework that addresses the high execution latency of bulk bitwise PUD operations by implementing a data-aware runtime engine for PUD. Proteus reduces the latency of PUD operations in three different ways: (i) Proteus dynamically reduces the bit-precision (and thus the latency and energy consumption) of PUD operations by exploiting narrow values (i.e., values with many leading zeros or ones); (ii) Proteus concurrently executes independent in-DRAM primitives belonging to a single PUD operation across multiple DRAM arrays; (iii) Proteus chooses and uses the most appropriate data representation and arithmetic algorithm implementation for a given PUD instruction transparently to the programmer.

cs.AR↗

arXiv2025

DaPPA: A Data-Parallel Programming Framework for Processing-in-Memory Architectures

The growing volume of data in modern applications has led to significant computational costs in conventional processor-centric systems. Processing-in-memory (PIM) architectures alleviate these costs by moving computation closer to memory, reducing data movement overheads. UPMEM is the first commercially available PIM system, featuring thousands of in-order processors (DPUs) integrated within DRAM modules. However, a programming UPMEM-based system remains challenging due to the need for explicit data management and workload partitioning across DPUs. We introduce DaPPA (data-parallel processing-in-memory architecture), a programming framework that eases the programmability of UPMEM systems by automatically managing data movement, memory allocation, and workload distribution. The key idea behind DaPPA is to leverage a high-level data-parallel pattern-based programming interface to abstract hardware complexities away from the programmer. DaPPA comprises three main components: (i) data-parallel pattern APIs, a collection of five primary data-parallel pattern primitives that allow the programmer to express data transformations within an application; (ii) a dataflow programming interface, which allows the programmer to define how data moves across data-parallel patterns; and (iii) a dynamic template-based compilation, which leverages code skeletons and dynamic code transformations to convert data-parallel patterns implemented via the dataflow programming interface into an optimized UPMEM binary. We evaluate DaPPA using six workloads from the PrIM benchmark suite on a real UPMEM system. Compared to hand-tuned implementations, DaPPA improves end-to-end performance by 2.1x, on average, and reduces programming complexity (measured in lines-of-code) by 94%. Our results demonstrate that DaPPA is an effective programming framework for efficient and user-friendly programming on UPMEM systems.

cs.AR↗

arXiv2025

PIMDAL: Mitigating the Memory Bottleneck in Data Analytics using a Real Processing-in-Memory System

Database Management Systems (DBMSs) are crucial for efficient data management and analytics, and are used in several different application domains. Due to the increasing volume of data a DBMS deals with, current processor-centric architectures (e.g., CPUs, GPUs) suffer from data movement bottlenecks when executing key DBMS operations (e.g., selection, aggregation, ordering, and join). This happens mostly due to the limited memory bandwidth between compute and memory resources. Data-centric architectures like Processing-in-Memory (PIM) are a promising alternative for applications bottlenecked by data, placing compute resources close to where data resides. Previous works have evaluated using PIM for data analytics. However, they either do not use real-world architectures or they consider only a subset of the operators used in analytical queries. This work aims to fully evaluate a data-centric approach to data analytics, by using the real-world UPMEM PIM system. To this end we first present the PIM Data Analytics Library (PIMDAL), which implements four major DB operators: selection, aggregation, ordering and join. Second, we use hardware performance metrics to understand which properties of a PIM system are important for a high-performance implementation. Third, we compare PIMDAL to reference implementations on high-end CPU and GPU systems. Fourth, we use PIMDAL to implement five TPC-H queries to gain insights into analytical queries. We analyze and show how to overcome the three main limitations of the UPMEM system when implementing DB operators: (I) low arithmetic performance, (II) explicit memory management and (III) limited communication between compute units. Our evaluation shows PIMDAL achieves 3.9x the performance of a high-end CPU, on average across the five TPC-H queries.

cs.AR↗

arXiv2025

Variable Read Disturbance: An Experimental Analysis of Temporal Variation in DRAM Read Disturbance

Modern DRAM chips are subject to read disturbance errors. State-of-the-art read disturbance mitigations rely on accurate and exhaustive characterization of the read disturbance threshold (RDT) (e.g., the number of aggressor row activations needed to induce the first RowHammer or RowPress bitflip) of every DRAM row (of which there are millions or billions in a modern system) to prevent read disturbance bitflips securely and with low overhead. We experimentally demonstrate for the first time that the RDT of a DRAM row significantly and unpredictably changes over time. We call this new phenomenon variable read disturbance (VRD). Our experiments using 160 DDR4 chips and 4 HBM2 chips from three major manufacturers yield two key observations. First, it is very unlikely that relatively few RDT measurements can accurately identify the RDT of a DRAM row. The minimum RDT of a DRAM row appears after tens of thousands of measurements (e.g., up to 94,467), and the minimum RDT of a DRAM row is 3.5X smaller than the maximum RDT observed for that row. Second, the probability of accurately identifying a row's RDT with a relatively small number of measurements reduces with increasing chip density or smaller technology node size. Our empirical results have implications for the security guarantees of read disturbance mitigation techniques: if the RDT of a DRAM row is not identified accurately, these techniques can easily become insecure. We discuss and evaluate using a guardband for RDT and error-correcting codes for mitigating read disturbance bitflips in the presence of RDTs that change unpredictably over time. We conclude that a >10% guardband for the minimum observed RDT combined with SECDED or Chipkill-like SSC error-correcting codes could prevent read disturbance bitflips at the cost of large read disturbance mitigation performance overheads (e.g., 45% performance loss for an RDT guardband of 50%).

cs.AR↗

arXiv2025

A Modern Primer on Processing in Memory

This paper discusses recent research that aims to enable computation close to data, an approach we broadly call processing-in-memory (PIM). PIM places computation mechanisms in or near where the data is stored (i.e., inside memory chips or modules, in the logic layer of 3D-stacked memory, in the memory controllers, in storage devices or chips), so that data movement between the computation units and memory/storage units is reduced or eliminated. While the general idea of PIM is not new, we discuss motivating trends in applications as well as memory circuits and technology that greatly exacerbate the need for enabling it in modern computing systems. We examine at least two promising new approaches to designing PIM systems to accelerate important data-intensive applications: (1) processing-using-memory, which exploits fundamental analog operational principles of memory chips to perform massively-parallel operations in-situ in memory, (2) processing-near-memory, which exploits different logic and memory integration technologies (e.g., 3D-stacked memory technology) to place computation logic close to memory circuitry, and thereby enable high-bandwidth, low-energy, and low-latency access to data. In both approaches, we describe and tackle relevant cross-layer research, design, and adoption challenges in devices, architecture, systems, compilers, programming models, and applications. Our focus is on the development of PIM designs that can be adopted in real computing platforms at low cost. We conclude by discussing work on solving key challenges to the practical adoption of PIM. We believe that the shift from a processor-centric to a memory-centric mindset (and infrastructure) remains the largest adoption challenge for PIM, which, once overcome, can unleash a fundamentally energy-efficient, high-performance, and sustainable new way of designing, using, and programming computing systems.

cs.AR↗

arXiv2025

pLUTo: Enabling Massively Parallel Computation in DRAM via Lookup Tables

Data movement between the main memory and the processor is a key contributor to execution time and energy consumption in memory-intensive applications. This data movement bottleneck can be alleviated using Processing-in-Memory (PiM). One category of PiM is Processing-using-Memory (PuM), in which computation takes place inside the memory array by exploiting intrinsic analog properties of the memory device. PuM yields high performance and energy efficiency, but existing PuM techniques support a limited range of operations. As a result, current PuM architectures cannot efficiently perform some complex operations (e.g., multiplication, division, exponentiation) without large increases in chip area and design complexity. To overcome these limitations of existing PuM architectures, we introduce pLUTo (processing-using-memory with lookup table (LUT) operations), a DRAM-based PuM architecture that leverages the high storage density of DRAM to enable the massively parallel storing and querying of lookup tables (LUTs). The key idea of pLUTo is to replace complex operations with low-cost, bulk memory reads (i.e., LUT queries) instead of relying on complex extra logic. We evaluate pLUTo across 11 real-world workloads that showcase the limitations of prior PuM approaches and show that our solution outperforms optimized CPU and GPU baselines by an average of 713$\times$ and 1.2$\times$, respectively, while simultaneously reducing energy consumption by an average of 1855$\times$ and 39.5$\times$. Across these workloads, pLUTo outperforms state-of-the-art PiM architectures by an average of 18.3$\times$. We also show that different versions of pLUTo provide different levels of flexibility and performance at different additional DRAM area overheads (between 10.2% and 23.1%). pLUTo's source code is openly and fully available at https://github.com/CMU-SAFARI/pLUTo.

cs.AR↗

arXiv2024

Memory-Centric Computing: Recent Advances in Processing-in-DRAM

Memory-centric computing aims to enable computation capability in and near all places where data is generated and stored. As such, it can greatly reduce the large negative performance and energy impact of data access and data movement, by 1) fundamentally avoiding data movement, 2) reducing data access latency & energy, and 3) exploiting large parallelism of memory arrays. Many recent studies show that memory-centric computing can largely improve system performance & energy efficiency. Major industrial vendors and startup companies have recently introduced memory chips with sophisticated computation capabilities. Going forward, both hardware and software stack should be revisited and designed carefully to take advantage of memory-centric computing. This work describes several major recent advances in memory-centric computing, specifically in Processing-in-DRAM, a paradigm where the operational characteristics of a DRAM chip are exploited and enhanced to perform computation on data stored in DRAM. Specifically, we describe 1) new techniques that slightly modify DRAM chips to enable both enhanced computation capability and easier programmability, 2) new experimental studies that demonstrate the functionally-complete bulk-bitwise computational capability of real commercial off-the-shelf DRAM chips, without any modifications to the DRAM chip or the interface, and 3) new DRAM designs that improve access granularity & efficiency, unleashing the true potential of Processing-in-DRAM.

cs.AR↗

arXiv2024

Understanding the Security Benefits and Overheads of Emerging Industry Solutions to DRAM Read Disturbance

We present the first rigorous security, performance, energy, and cost analyses of the state-of-the-art on-DRAM-die read disturbance mitigation method, Per Row Activation Counting (PRAC), described in JEDEC DDR5 specification's April 2024 update. Unlike prior state-of-the-art that advises the memory controller to periodically issue refresh management (RFM) commands, which provides the DRAM chip with time to perform refreshes, PRAC introduces a new back-off signal. PRAC's back-off signal propagates from the DRAM chip to the memory controller and forces the memory controller to 1) stop serving requests and 2) issue RFM commands. As a result, RFM commands are issued when needed as opposed to periodically, reducing RFM's overheads. We analyze PRAC in four steps. First, we define an adversarial access pattern that represents the worst-case for PRAC's security. Second, we investigate PRAC's configurations and security implications. Our analyses show that PRAC can be configured for secure operation as long as no bitflip occurs before accessing a memory location 10 times. Third, we evaluate the performance impact of PRAC and compare it against prior works using Ramulator 2.0. Our analysis shows that while PRAC incurs less than 13% performance overhead for today's DRAM chips, its performance overheads can reach up to 94% for future DRAM chips that are more vulnerable to read disturbance bitflips. Fourth, we define an availability adversarial access pattern that exacerbates PRAC's performance overhead to perform a memory performance attack, demonstrating that such an adversarial pattern can hog up to 94% of DRAM throughput and degrade system throughput by up to 95%. We discuss PRAC's implications on future systems and foreshadow future research directions. To aid future research, we open-source our implementations and scripts at https://github.com/CMU-SAFARI/ramulator2.

cs.CR↗