arXiv2020
Given any compact Riemann surface $C$, there is a canonical meromorphic 2--form $\widehatη$ on $C\times C$, with pole of order two on the diagonal $Δ\, \subset\, C\times C$, constructed in \cite{cfg}. This meromorphic 2--form $\widehatη$ produces a canonical projective structure on $C$. On the other hand the uniformization theorem provides another canonical projective structure on any compact Riemann surface $C$. We prove that these two projective structures differ in general. This is done by comparing the $(0,1)$--component of the differential of the corresponding sections of the moduli space of projective structures over the moduli space of curves. The $(0,1)$--component of the differential of the section corresponding to the projective structure given by the uniformization theorem was computed by Zograf and Takhtadzhyan in \cite{ZT} as the Weil--Petersson Kähler form $ω_{wp}$ on the moduli space of curves. We prove that the $(0,1)$--component of the differential of the section of the moduli space of projective structures corresponding to $\widehatη$ is the pullback of a nonzero constant scalar multiple of the Siegel form, on the moduli space of principally polarized abelian varieties, by the Torelli map.