Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Giosuè Gambardella

Publications and source records attributed to Giosuè Gambardella.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Mitigating prior-volume effects in galaxy clustering by adopting Mpc over Mpc/h units

We investigate prior-volume effects in Bayesian analyses of galaxy clustering based on state-of-the-art models, such as the EFT and the VDG$_\infty$ model. We show that these effects are largely driven by imposing priors on the model parameters defined in ${\rm Mpc}/h$ units, thereby introducing a spurious correlation with the Hubble parameter $h$, and that they can be strongly mitigated by adopting a more physically motivated formulation in ${\rm Mpc}$ units. We test this approach using a set of synthetic data vectors designed to reproduce the clustering signal expected in a Stage-IV survey across a range of cosmological models, including $Λ$CDM, $K$CDM, $w$CDM, and $w_0w_a$CDM. We find that the resulting constraints are largely free from shifts induced during the marginalisation process, even in the challenging $w_0w_a$CDM runs, reducing discrepancies with the fiducial values from several standard deviations to well within $1σ$. The performance of this approach is comparable to that of alternative mitigation strategies, such as the adoption of invariant priors or the reparametrisation of nuisance parameters in terms of growth and geometrical amplitudes. For the latter, we find that using $σ_{12}$ in place of the commonly adopted $σ_8$ to describe the amplitude of density fluctuations improves the performance of the reparametrisation technique, even at high redshifts, where constraints on the dark-energy equation of state are weaker. We further show that these conclusions hold with the inclusion of additional BAO constraints, and for data sets with reduced statistical power. These results add to the benefits of working with ${\rm Mpc}$ units, avoiding an explicit dependence on $h$, with direct relevance for the analyses of Stage-IV galaxy surveys.

astro-ph.CO↗

On the range of validity of perturbative models for galaxy clustering and its uncertainty

We explore the reach of analytical models at one-loop in Perturbation Theory (PT) to accurately describe measurements of the galaxy power spectrum from numerical simulations in redshift space. We consider the validity range in terms of three different diagnostics: 1) the goodness of fit; 2) a figure-of-bias quantifying the error in recovering the fiducial value of a cosmological parameter; 3) an internal consistency check of the theoretical model quantifying the running of the model parameters with the scale cut. We consider different sets of measurements corresponding to an increasing cumulative simulation volume in redshift space. For each volume we define a median value and the associated scatter for the largest wavenumber where the model is valid (the $k$-reach of the model). We find, as a rather general result, that the median value of the reach decreases with the simulation volume, as expected since the smaller statistical errors provide a more stringent test for the model. This is true for all the three definitions considered, with the one given in terms of the figure-of-bias providing the most stringent scale cut. More interestingly, we find as well that the error associated with the $k$-reach value is quite large, with a significant probability of being as low as 0.1$\, h \, {\rm Mpc}^{-1}$ (or, more generally, up to 40% smaller than the median) for all the simulation volumes considered. We explore as well the additional information on the growth rate parameter encoded in the power spectrum hexadecapole, compared to the analysis of monopole and quadrupole, as a function of simulation volume. While our analysis is, in many ways, rather simplified, we find that the gain in the determination of the growth rate is quite small in absolute value and well within the statistical error on the corresponding figure of merit.

astro-ph.CO↗