SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Gongce Cao

Publications and source records attributed to Gongce Cao.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Robust Recommendation from Noisy Implicit Feedback: A GMM-Weighted Bayes-label Transition Matrix Framework

Label noise is a central challenge in learning from implicit feedback for recommendation. Conventional approaches discard noisy examples for robustness, but this sacrifices data efficiency. Unlike filtering approaches, Bayes-label transition matrix (BLTM) based methods keep all data, but their transition matrix estimates are skewed in practice. To reduce this skew, we introduce GMM-weighted Bayes-label Transition Matrix (RGBT), which augments BLTM with GMM-based instance weights. A GMM assigns each instance a reliability score, and these scores calibrate the BLTM to reduce bias. We show theoretically that RGBT retains all samples for BLTM estimation, yields consistent estimates, and provably reduces variance compared to CLTM. Experiments on real and synthetic datasets show that RGBT handles noisy samples more effectively than sample-selection methods, and calibrates the transition matrix more accurately than existing approaches.

cs.LG

AI Governance InternationaL Evaluation Index (AGILE Index) 2025

The year 2024 witnessed accelerated global AI governance advancements, marked by strengthened multilateral frameworks and proliferating national regulatory initiatives. This acceleration underscores an unprecedented need to systematically track governance progress--an imperative that drove the launch of the AI Governance InternationaL Evaluation Index (AGILE Index) project since 2023. The inaugural AGILE Index, released in February 2024 after assessing 14 countries, established an operational and comparable baseline framework. Building on pilot insights, AGILE Index 2025 incorporates systematic refinements to better balance scientific rigor with practical adaptability. The updated methodology expands data diversity while enhancing metric validity and cross-national comparability. Reflecting both research advancements and practical policy evolution, AGILE Index 2025 evaluates 40 countries across income levels, regions, and technological development stages, with 4 Pillars, 17 Dimensions and 43 Indicators. In compiling the data, the team integrates multi-source evidence including policy documents, governance practices, research outputs, and risk exposure to construct a unified comparison framework. This approach maps global disparities while enabling countries to identify governance strengths, gaps, and systemic constraints. Through ongoing refinement and iterations, we hope the AGILE Index will fundamentally advance transparency and measurability in global AI governance, delivering data-driven assessments that depict national AI governance capacity, assist governments in recognizing their maturation stages and critical governance issues, and ultimately provide actionable insights for enhancing AI governance systems nationally and globally.

cs.CY