Gregor Rauw — Page 5

arXiv2001

What is the real nature of HD 108 ?

Since the beginning of the past century, the nature of HD 108 has been a subject of intense debate. One after another, astronomers explored its variability and attributed it either to binarity, or to changes in the stellar wind of a single star. In this article, we analyse a 30 years long campaign of spectroscopic observations of this star with special emphasis on the last 15 years during which photographic plates have been replaced by CCD detectors. Our investigation of the radial velocities of HD 108 yields no significant short- or long-term period and does not confirm the published periodicities either. Though the radial velocity of HD 108 appears clearly variable, the variations cannot be explained by the orbital motion in a spectroscopic binary. However, our data reveal spectacular changes in the H I Balmer lines and some He I profiles over the years. These lines continuously evolved from P Cygni profiles to `pure' absorption lines. A similar behaviour was already observed in the past, suggesting that these changes are recurrent. HD 108 seems to share several characteristics of Oe stars and we discuss different hypotheses for the origin of the observed long-term variations. As we are now in a transition period, a continuous monitoring of HD 108 should be considered for the next few years.

astro-ph↗

arXiv2000

Coordinated Monitoring of the Eccentric O-star Binary Iota Orionis: The X-ray Analysis

We analyse two ASCA observations of the highly eccentric O9III + B1III binary Iota Orionis obtained at periastron and apastron. Based on the assumption of a strong colliding winds shock between the stellar components, we expected to see significant variation in the X-ray emission between these phases. The observations proved otherwise: the X-ray luminosities and spectral distributions were remarkably similar. The only noteworthy feature was the hint of a proximity effect during periastron passage, supported also in the optical. We discuss the accuracy of our results, and also analyse archival ROSAT observations. We investigate why we do not see a clear colliding winds signature. A simple model shows that the wind attenuation to the expected position of the shock apex is negligible throughout the orbit, which poses the puzzling question of why the expected 1/D variation (ie. a factor of 7.5) in the intrinsic luminosity is not seen in the data. Two scenarios are proposed: either the colliding winds emission is unexpectedly weak such that intrinsic shocks in the winds dominate the emission, or, alternatively, that the emission observed is colliding winds emission but in a more complex form than we would naively expect. Complex hydrodynamical models are then analyzed. Despite strongly phase-variable emission from the models, both were consistent with the observations. We find that if the mass-loss rates of the stars are low then intrinsic wind shocks could dominate the emission. However, when we assume higher mass-loss rates of the stars, we find that the observed emission could also be consistent with a purely colliding winds origin. To distinguish between the different models X-ray observations with improved phase coverage will be necessary.

astro-ph↗