Gregory Watson | Searcharxiv

arXiv2026

MPEX AI Digital Twins Milestone Report

This is the six month progress report to Fusion Energy Science (FES) and the American Science Cloud (AmSC) on the MPEX AI Digtial Twins project that was started in October 2025. There are two milestones to demonstrate the Artificial Intelligence (AI) advantage for MPEX operations and scientific discovery, that will be completed by June 2026. The first is a Helicon AI Hot-Spot Controller (Sec. 3.1), which is the helicon heating component of the more comprehensive planned MPEX AI Hot Spot Digital Twin (Sec. 3). The second is an E-beam Damage Assessment Digital Twin (Sec. 4.1), which is a reduced electron beam damage modality prototype for the MPEX AI Damage Assessment Digital Twin (Sec. 4). These two phase I milestones are on track for the June demonstration. In addition to these two milestones, progress on configuring the Galaxy software interface for automation, validation and data analysis is reported (Sec. 5). This interface now connects a subset of the main physics simulation codes to DOE HPC resources and will connect to the MPEX data acquisition system so that analysis of data, validation and execution of simulations can be performed by the scientist or by AI-Agents. When AmSC is ready to accept connections and data, Galaxy will be the MPEX interface to AmSC

physics.plasm-ph↗

arXiv2026

Multi-Artifact Analysis of Self-Admitted Technical Debt in Scientific Software

Context: Self-admitted technical debt (SATD) occurs when developers acknowledge shortcuts in code. In scientific software (SSW), such debt poses unique risks to the validity and reproducibility of results. Objective: This study aims to identify, categorize, and evaluate scientific debt, a specialized form of SATD in SSW, and assess the extent to which traditional SATD categories capture these domain-specific issues. Method: We conduct a multi-artifact analysis across code comments, commit messages, pull requests, and issue trackers from 23 open-source SSW projects. We construct and validate a curated dataset of scientific debt, develop a multi-source SATD classifier, and conduct a practitioner validation to assess the practical relevance of scientific debt. Results: Our classifier performs strongly across 900,358 artifacts from 23 SSW projects. SATD is most prevalent in pull requests and issue trackers, underscoring the value of multi-artifact analysis. Models trained on traditional SATD often miss scientific debt, emphasizing the need for its explicit detection in SSW. Practitioner validation confirmed that scientific debt is both recognizable and useful in practice. Conclusions: Scientific debt represents a unique form of SATD in SSW that that is not adequately captured by traditional categories and requires specialized identification and management. Our dataset, classification analysis, and practitioner validation results provide the first formal multi-artifact perspective on scientific debt, highlighting the need for tailored SATD detection approaches in SSW.

cs.SE↗