Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Guanghui Lan

Publications and source records attributed to Guanghui Lan.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
arXiv2024

Optimal and parameter-free gradient minimization methods for convex and nonconvex optimization

We propose novel optimal and parameter-free algorithms for computing an approximate solution with small (projected) gradient norm. Specifically, for computing an approximate solution such that the norm of its (projected) gradient does not exceed $\varepsilon$, we obtain the following results: a) for the convex case, the total number of gradient evaluations is bounded by $O(1)\sqrt{L\|x_0 - x^*\|/\varepsilon}$, where $L$ is the Lipschitz constant of the gradient and $x^*$ is any optimal solution; b) for the strongly convex case, the total number of gradient evaluations is bounded by $O(1)\sqrt{L/μ}\log(\|\nabla f(x_0)\|/ε)$, where $μ$ is the strong convexity modulus; and c) for the nonconvex case, the total number of gradient evaluations is bounded by $O(1)\sqrt{Ll}(f(x_0) - f(x^*))/\varepsilon^2$, where $l$ is the lower curvature constant. Our complexity results match the lower complexity bounds of the convex and strongly cases, and achieve the above best-known complexity bound for the nonconvex case for the first time in the literature. Our results can also be extended to problems with constraints and composite objectives. Moreover, for all the convex, strongly convex, and nonconvex cases, we propose parameter-free algorithms that do not require the input of any problem parameters or the convexity status of the problem. To the best of our knowledge, there do not exist such parameter-free methods before especially for the strongly convex and nonconvex cases. Since most regularity conditions (e.g., strong convexity and lower curvature) are imposed over a global scope, the corresponding problem parameters are notoriously difficult to estimate. However, gradient norm minimization equips us with a convenient tool to monitor the progress of algorithms and thus the ability to estimate such parameters in-situ.

math.OC↗
arXiv2024

Auto-conditioned primal-dual hybrid gradient method and alternating direction method of multipliers

Line search procedures are often employed in primal-dual methods for bilinear saddle point problems, especially when the norm of the linear operator is large or difficult to compute. In this paper, we demonstrate that line search is unnecessary by introducing a novel primal-dual method, the auto-conditioned primal-dual hybrid gradient (AC-PDHG) method, which achieves optimal complexity for solving bilinear saddle point problems. AC-PDHG is fully adaptive to the linear operator, using only past iterates to estimate its norm. We further tailor AC-PDHG to solve linearly constrained problems, providing convergence guarantees for both the optimality gap and constraint violation. Moreover, we explore an important class of linearly constrained problems where both the objective and constraints decompose into two parts. By incorporating the design principles of AC-PDHG into the preconditioned alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM), we propose the auto-conditioned alternating direction method of multipliers (AC-ADMM), which guarantees convergence based solely on one part of the constraint matrix and fully adapts to it, eliminating the need for line search. Finally, we extend both AC-PDHG and AC-ADMM to solve bilinear problems with an additional smooth term. By integrating these methods with a novel acceleration scheme, we attain optimal iteration complexities under the single-oracle setting.

math.OC↗
arXiv2024

Stochastic first-order methods for average-reward Markov decision processes

We study average-reward Markov decision processes (AMDPs) and develop novel first-order methods with strong theoretical guarantees for both policy optimization and policy evaluation. Compared with intensive research efforts in finite sample analysis of policy gradient methods for discounted MDPs, existing studies on policy gradient methods for AMDPs mostly focus on regret bounds under restrictive assumptions, and they often lack guarantees on the overall sample complexities. Towards this end, we develop an average-reward stochastic policy mirror descent (SPMD) method for solving AMDPs with and without regularizers and provide convergence guarantees in terms of the long-term average reward. For policy evaluation, existing on-policy methods suffer from sub-optimal convergence rates as well as failure in handling insufficiently random policies due to the lack of exploration in the action space. To remedy these issues, we develop a variance-reduced temporal difference (VRTD) method with linear function approximation for randomized policies along with optimal convergence guarantees, and design an exploratory VRTD method that resolves the exploration issue and provides comparable convergence guarantees. By combining the policy evaluation and policy optimization parts, we establish sample complexity results for solving AMDPs under both generative and Markovian noise models. It is worth noting that when linear function approximation is utilized, our algorithm only needs to update in the low-dimensional parameter space and thus can handle MDPs with large state and action spaces.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2024

Accelerated stochastic approximation with state-dependent noise

We consider a class of stochastic smooth convex optimization problems under rather general assumptions on the noise in the stochastic gradient observation. As opposed to the classical problem setting in which the variance of noise is assumed to be uniformly bounded, herein we assume that the variance of stochastic gradients is related to the "sub-optimality" of the approximate solutions delivered by the algorithm. Such problems naturally arise in a variety of applications, in particular, in the well-known generalized linear regression problem in statistics. However, to the best of our knowledge, none of the existing stochastic approximation algorithms for solving this class of problems attain optimality in terms of the dependence on accuracy, problem parameters, and mini-batch size. We discuss two non-Euclidean accelerated stochastic approximation routines--stochastic accelerated gradient descent (SAGD) and stochastic gradient extrapolation (SGE)--which carry a particular duality relationship. We show that both SAGD and SGE, under appropriate conditions, achieve the optimal convergence rate, attaining the optimal iteration and sample complexities simultaneously. However, corresponding assumptions for the SGE algorithm are more general; they allow, for instance, for efficient application of the SGE to statistical estimation problems under heavy tail noises and discontinuous score functions. We also discuss the application of the SGE to problems satisfying quadratic growth conditions, and show how it can be used to recover sparse solutions. Finally, we report on some simulation experiments to illustrate numerical performance of our proposed algorithms in high-dimensional settings.

math.OC↗
arXiv2024

A simple uniformly optimal method without line search for convex optimization

Line search (or backtracking) procedures have been widely employed into first-order methods for solving convex optimization problems, especially those with unknown problem parameters (e.g., Lipschitz constant). In this paper, we show that line search is superfluous in attaining the optimal rate of convergence for solving a convex optimization problem whose parameters are not given a priori. In particular, we present a novel accelerated gradient descent type algorithm called auto-conditioned fast gradient method (AC-FGM) that can achieve an optimal $\mathcal{O}(1/k^2)$ rate of convergence for smooth convex optimization without requiring the estimate of a global Lipschitz constant or the employment of line search procedures. We then extend AC-FGM to solve convex optimization problems with Hölder continuous gradients and show that it automatically achieves the optimal rates of convergence uniformly for all problem classes with the desired accuracy of the solution as the only input. Finally, we report some encouraging numerical results that demonstrate the advantages of AC-FGM over the previously developed parameter-free methods for convex optimization.

math.OC↗
arXiv2024

Level Constrained First Order Methods for Function Constrained Optimization

We present a new feasible proximal gradient method for constrained optimization where both the objective and constraint functions are given by the summation of a smooth, possibly nonconvex function and a convex simple function. The algorithm converts the original problem into a sequence of convex subproblems. Formulating those subproblems requires the evaluation of at most one gradient value of the original objective and constraint functions. Either exact or approximate subproblem solutions can be computed efficiently in many cases. An important feature of the algorithm is the constraint level parameter. By carefully increasing this level for each subproblem, we provide a simple solution to overcome the challenge of bounding the Lagrangian multipliers and show that the algorithm follows a strictly feasible solution path till convergence to the stationary point. We develop a simple, proximal gradient descent type analysis, showing that the complexity bound of this new algorithm is comparable to gradient descent for the unconstrained setting, which is new in the literature. Exploiting this new design and analysis technique, we extend our algorithms to some more challenging constrained optimization problems where 1) the objective is a stochastic or finite-sum function, and 2) structured nonsmooth functions replace smooth components of both objective and constraint functions. Complexity results for these problems also seem to be new in the literature. Finally, our method can also be applied to convex function-constrained problems where we show complexities similar to the proximal gradient method.

math.OC↗
arXiv2023

A Novel Catalyst Scheme for Stochastic Minimax Optimization

This paper presents a proximal-point-based catalyst scheme for simple first-order methods applied to convex minimization and convex-concave minimax problems. In particular, for smooth and (strongly)-convex minimization problems, the proposed catalyst scheme, instantiated with a simple variant of stochastic gradient method, attains the optimal rate of convergence in terms of both deterministic and stochastic errors. For smooth and strongly-convex-strongly-concave minimax problems, the catalyst scheme attains the optimal rate of convergence for deterministic and stochastic errors up to a logarithmic factor. To the best of our knowledge, this reported convergence seems to be attained for the first time by stochastic first-order methods in the literature. We obtain this result by designing and catalyzing a novel variant of stochastic extragradient method for solving smooth and strongly-monotone variational inequality, which may be of independent interest.

math.OC↗
arXiv2023

Data-Driven Minimax Optimization with Expectation Constraints

Attention to data-driven optimization approaches, including the well-known stochastic gradient descent method, has grown significantly over recent decades, but data-driven constraints have rarely been studied, because of the computational challenges of projections onto the feasible set defined by these hard constraints. In this paper, we focus on the non-smooth convex-concave stochastic minimax regime and formulate the data-driven constraints as expectation constraints. The minimax expectation constrained problem subsumes a broad class of real-world applications, including two-player zero-sum game and data-driven robust optimization. We propose a class of efficient primal-dual algorithms to tackle the minimax expectation-constrained problem, and show that our algorithms converge at the optimal rate of $\mathcal{O}(\frac{1}{\sqrt{N}})$. We demonstrate the practical efficiency of our algorithms by conducting numerical experiments on large-scale real-world applications.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2023

First-order Policy Optimization for Robust Policy Evaluation

We adopt a policy optimization viewpoint towards policy evaluation for robust Markov decision process with $\mathrm{s}$-rectangular ambiguity sets. The developed method, named first-order policy evaluation (FRPE), provides the first unified framework for robust policy evaluation in both deterministic (offline) and stochastic (online) settings, with either tabular representation or generic function approximation. In particular, we establish linear convergence in the deterministic setting, and $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(1/ε^2)$ sample complexity in the stochastic setting. FRPE also extends naturally to evaluating the robust state-action value function with $(\mathrm{s}, \mathrm{a})$-rectangular ambiguity sets. We discuss the application of the developed results for stochastic policy optimization of large-scale robust MDPs.

math.OC↗
arXiv2023

Simple and optimal methods for stochastic variational inequalities, I: operator extrapolation

In this paper we first present a novel operator extrapolation (OE) method for solving deterministic variational inequality (VI) problems. Similar to the gradient (operator) projection method, OE updates one single search sequence by solving a single projection subproblem in each iteration. We show that OE can achieve the optimal rate of convergence for solving a variety of VI problems in a much simpler way than existing approaches. We then introduce the stochastic operator extrapolation (SOE) method and establish its optimal convergence behavior for solving different stochastic VI problems. In particular, SOE achieves the optimal complexity for solving a fundamental problem, i.e., stochastic smooth and strongly monotone VI, for the first time in the literature. We also present a stochastic block operator extrapolations (SBOE) method to further reduce the iteration cost for the OE method applied to large-scale deterministic VIs with a certain block structure. Numerical experiments have been conducted to demonstrate the potential advantages of the proposed algorithms. In fact, all these algorithms are applied to solve generalized monotone variational inequality (GMVI) problems whose operator is not necessarily monotone. We will also discuss optimal OE-based policy evaluation methods for reinforcement learning in a companion paper.

math.OC↗
arXiv2023

First-order Policy Optimization for Robust Markov Decision Process

We consider the problem of solving robust Markov decision process (MDP), which involves a set of discounted, finite state, finite action space MDPs with uncertain transition kernels. The goal of planning is to find a robust policy that optimizes the worst-case values against the transition uncertainties, and thus encompasses the standard MDP planning as a special case. For $(\mathbf{s},\mathbf{a})$-rectangular uncertainty sets, we establish several structural observations on the robust objective, which facilitates the development of a policy-based first-order method, namely the robust policy mirror descent (RPMD). An $\mathcal{O}(\log(1/ε))$ iteration complexity for finding an $ε$-optimal policy is established with linearly increasing stepsizes. We further develop a stochastic variant of the robust policy mirror descent method, named SRPMD, when the first-order information is only available through online interactions with the nominal environment. We show that the optimality gap converges linearly up to the noise level, and consequently establish an $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(1/ε^2)$ sample complexity by developing a temporal difference learning method for policy evaluation. Both iteration and sample complexities are also discussed for RPMD with a constant stepsize. To the best of our knowledge, all the aforementioned results appear to be new for policy-based first-order methods applied to the robust MDP problem.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2023

Complexity of Stochastic Dual Dynamic Programming

Stochastic dual dynamic programming is a cutting plane type algorithm for multi-stage stochastic optimization originated about 30 years ago. In spite of its popularity in practice, there does not exist any analysis on the convergence rates of this method. In this paper, we first establish the number of iterations, i.e., iteration complexity, required by a basic dynamic cutting plane method for solving relatively simple multi-stage optimization problems, by introducing novel mathematical tools including the saturation of search points. We then refine these basic tools and establish the iteration complexity for both deterministic and stochastic dual dynamic programming methods for solving more general multi-stage stochastic optimization problems under the standard stage-wise independence assumption. Our results indicate that the complexity of some deterministic variants of these methods mildly increases with the number of stages $T$, in fact linearly dependent on $T$ for discounted problems. Therefore, they are efficient for strategic decision making which involves a large number of stages, but with a relatively small number of decision variables in each stage. Without explicitly discretizing the state and action spaces, these methods might also be pertinent to the related reinforcement learning and stochastic control areas.

math.OC↗
arXiv2023

Numerical Methods for Convex Multistage Stochastic Optimization

Optimization problems involving sequential decisions in a stochastic environment were studied in Stochastic Programming (SP), Stochastic Optimal Control (SOC) and Markov Decision Processes (MDP). In this paper we mainly concentrate on SP and SOC modelling approaches. In these frameworks there are natural situations when the considered problems are convex. Classical approach to sequential optimization is based on dynamic programming. It has the problem of the so-called ``Curse of Dimensionality", in that its computational complexity increases exponentially with increase of dimension of state variables. Recent progress in solving convex multistage stochastic problems is based on cutting planes approximations of the cost-to-go (value) functions of dynamic programming equations. Cutting planes type algorithms in dynamical settings is one of the main topics of this paper. We also discuss Stochastic Approximation type methods applied to multistage stochastic optimization problems. From the computational complexity point of view, these two types of methods seem to be complimentary to each other. Cutting plane type methods can handle multistage problems with a large number of stages, but a relatively smaller number of state (decision) variables. On the other hand, stochastic approximation type methods can only deal with a small number of stages, but a large number of decision variables.

math.OC↗
arXiv2023

Policy Mirror Descent Inherently Explores Action Space

Explicit exploration in the action space was assumed to be indispensable for online policy gradient methods to avoid a drastic degradation in sample complexity, for solving general reinforcement learning problems over finite state and action spaces. In this paper, we establish for the first time an $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(1/ε^2)$ sample complexity for online policy gradient methods without incorporating any exploration strategies. The essential development consists of two new on-policy evaluation operators and a novel analysis of the stochastic policy mirror descent method (SPMD). SPMD with the first evaluation operator, called value-based estimation, tailors to the Kullback-Leibler divergence. Provided the Markov chains on the state space of generated policies are uniformly mixing with non-diminishing minimal visitation measure, an $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(1/ε^2)$ sample complexity is obtained with a linear dependence on the size of the action space. SPMD with the second evaluation operator, namely truncated on-policy Monte Carlo (TOMC), attains an $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\mathcal{H}_{\mathcal{D}}/ε^2)$ sample complexity, where $\mathcal{H}_{\mathcal{D}}$ mildly depends on the effective horizon and the size of the action space with properly chosen Bregman divergence (e.g., Tsallis divergence). SPMD with TOMC also exhibits stronger convergence properties in that it controls the optimality gap with high probability rather than in expectation. In contrast to explicit exploration, these new policy gradient methods can prevent repeatedly committing to potentially high-risk actions when searching for optimal policies.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2023

Optimal Methods for Convex Risk Averse Distributed Optimization

This paper studies the communication complexity of convex risk-averse optimization over a network. The problem generalizes the well-studied risk-neutral finite-sum distributed optimization problem and its importance stems from the need to handle risk in an uncertain environment. For algorithms in the literature, there exists a gap in communication complexities for solving risk-averse and risk-neutral problems. We propose two distributed algorithms, namely the distributed risk averse optimization (DRAO) method and the distributed risk averse optimization with sliding (DRAO-S) method, to close the gap. Specifically, the DRAO method achieves the optimal communication complexity by assuming a certain saddle point subproblem can be easily solved in the server node. The DRAO-S method removes the strong assumption by introducing a novel saddle point sliding subroutine which only requires the projection over the ambiguity set $P$. We observe that the number of $P$-projections performed by DRAO-S is optimal. Moreover, we develop matching lower complexity bounds to show the communication complexities of both DRAO and DRAO-S to be improvable. Numerical experiments are conducted to demonstrate the encouraging empirical performance of the DRAO-S method.

math.OC↗
arXiv2023

A Unified Single-loop Alternating Gradient Projection Algorithm for Nonconvex-Concave and Convex-Nonconcave Minimax Problems

Much recent research effort has been directed to the development of efficient algorithms for solving minimax problems with theoretical convergence guarantees due to the relevance of these problems to a few emergent applications. In this paper, we propose a unified single-loop alternating gradient projection (AGP) algorithm for solving smooth nonconvex-(strongly) concave and (strongly) convex-nonconcave minimax problems. AGP employs simple gradient projection steps for updating the primal and dual variables alternatively at each iteration. We show that it can find an $\varepsilon$-stationary point of the objective function in $\mathcal{O}\left( \varepsilon ^{-2} \right)$ (resp. $\mathcal{O}\left( \varepsilon ^{-4} \right)$) iterations under nonconvex-strongly concave (resp. nonconvex-concave) setting. Moreover, its gradient complexity to obtain an $\varepsilon$-stationary point of the objective function is bounded by $\mathcal{O}\left( \varepsilon ^{-2} \right)$ (resp., $\mathcal{O}\left( \varepsilon ^{-4} \right)$) under the strongly convex-nonconcave (resp., convex-nonconcave) setting. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that a simple and unified single-loop algorithm is developed for solving both nonconvex-(strongly) concave and (strongly) convex-nonconcave minimax problems. Moreover, the complexity results for solving the latter (strongly) convex-nonconcave minimax problems have never been obtained before in the literature. Numerical results show the efficiency of the proposed AGP algorithm. Furthermore, we extend the AGP algorithm by presenting a block alternating proximal gradient (BAPG) algorithm for solving more general multi-block nonsmooth nonconvex-(strongly) concave and (strongly) convex-nonconcave minimax problems. We can similarly establish the gradient complexity of the proposed algorithm under these four different settings.

math.OC↗
arXiv2022

Homotopic Policy Mirror Descent: Policy Convergence, Implicit Regularization, and Improved Sample Complexity

We propose a new policy gradient method, named homotopic policy mirror descent (HPMD), for solving discounted, infinite horizon MDPs with finite state and action spaces. HPMD performs a mirror descent type policy update with an additional diminishing regularization term, and possesses several computational properties that seem to be new in the literature. We first establish the global linear convergence of HPMD instantiated with Kullback-Leibler divergence, for both the optimality gap, and a weighted distance to the set of optimal policies. Then local superlinear convergence is obtained for both quantities without any assumption. With local acceleration and diminishing regularization, we establish the first result among policy gradient methods on certifying and characterizing the limiting policy, by showing, with a non-asymptotic characterization, that the last-iterate policy converges to the unique optimal policy with the maximal entropy. We then extend all the aforementioned results to HPMD instantiated with a broad class of decomposable Bregman divergences, demonstrating the generality of the these computational properties. As a by product, we discover the finite-time exact convergence for some commonly used Bregman divergences, implying the continuing convergence of HPMD to the limiting policy even if the current policy is already optimal. Finally, we develop a stochastic version of HPMD and establish similar convergence properties. By exploiting the local acceleration, we show that for small optimality gap, a better than $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\left|\mathcal{S}\right| \left|\mathcal{A}\right| / ε^2)$ sample complexity holds with high probability, when assuming a generative model for policy evaluation.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2022

Block Policy Mirror Descent

In this paper, we present a new policy gradient (PG) methods, namely the block policy mirror descent (BPMD) method for solving a class of regularized reinforcement learning (RL) problems with (strongly)-convex regularizers. Compared to the traditional PG methods with a batch update rule, which visits and updates the policy for every state, BPMD method has cheap per-iteration computation via a partial update rule that performs the policy update on a sampled state. Despite the nonconvex nature of the problem and a partial update rule, we provide a unified analysis for several sampling schemes, and show that BPMD achieves fast linear convergence to the global optimality. In particular, uniform sampling leads to comparable worst-case total computational complexity as batch PG methods. A necessary and sufficient condition for convergence with on-policy sampling is also identified. With a hybrid sampling scheme, we further show that BPMD enjoys potential instance-dependent acceleration, leading to improved dependence on the state space and consequently outperforming batch PG methods. We then extend BPMD methods to the stochastic setting, by utilizing stochastic first-order information constructed from samples. With a generative model, $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\left\lvert \mathcal{S}\right\rvert \left\lvert \mathcal{A}\right\rvert /ε)$ (resp. $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\left\lvert \mathcal{S}\right\rvert \left\lvert \mathcal{A} \right\rvert /ε^2)$) sample complexities are established for the strongly-convex (resp. non-strongly-convex) regularizers, where $ε$ denotes the target accuracy. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that block coordinate descent methods have been developed and analyzed for policy optimization in reinforcement learning, which provides a new perspective on solving large-scale RL problems.

cs.LG↗