arXiv subjects

Guillermo Toyos-Marfurt

Publications and source records attributed to Guillermo Toyos-Marfurt.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Conflict-Freedom as a Progress Condition

An obstruction-free implementation guarantees progress to every operation that is given enough time to take steps in isolation. But, as we show in this paper, the mere presence of concurrent operations alone does not have to prevent progress; only incomplete conflicting (non-commuting) operations may do so. This progress condition, that we call conflict-freedom, is a natural generalization of obstruction-freedom that promises efficient implementations for objects exhibiting semantic commutativity. We show that, as with obstruction-freedom, every sequential object has a read-write conflict-free linearizable implementation. Our conflict-free universal construction is based on a novel generalization of the instrumental commit-adopt object, interesting in its own right.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2026

Pending Conflicts Make Progress Impossible

In this work, we study progress conditions for commutativity-aware, linearizable implementations of shared objects. Motivated by the observation that commuting operations can be executed in parallel, we introduce conflict-obstruction-freedom: a process is guaranteed to complete its operation if it runs for long enough without encountering step contention with conflicting (non-commuting) operations. This condition generalizes obstruction-freedom and wait-freedom by allowing progress as long as step contention is only induced by commuting operations. We prove that conflict-obstruction-free universal constructions are impossible to implement in the asynchronous read-write shared memory model. This result exposes a fundamental limitation of conflict-aware universal constructions: the mere invocation of conflicting operations imposes a synchronization cost. Progress requires eventual resolution of pending conflicts.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2025

Space-Time Trade-off in Bounded Iterated Memory

The celebrated asynchronous computability theorem (ACT) characterizes tasks solvable in the read-write shared-memory model using the unbounded full-information protocol, where in every round of computation, each process shares its complete knowledge of the system with the other processes. Therefore, ACT assumes shared-memory variables of unbounded capacity. It has been recently shown that boundedvariables can achieve the same computational power at the expense of extra rounds. However, the exact relationship between the bit capacity of the shared memory and the number of rounds required in order to implement one round of the full-information protocol remained unknown. In this paper, we focus on the asymptotic round complexity of bounded iterated shared-memory algorithms that simulate, up to isomorphism, the unbounded full-information protocol. We relate the round complexity to the number of processes $n$, the number of iterations of the full information protocol $r$, and the bit size per shared-memory entry $b$. By analyzing the corresponding protocol complex, a combinatorial structure representing reachable states, we derive necessary conditions and present a bounded full-information algorithm tailored to the bits available $b$ per shared memory entry. We show that for $n>2$, the round complexity required to implement the full-information protocol satisfies $\Omega((n!)^{r-1} \cdot 2^{n-b})$. Our results apply to a range of iterated shared-memory models, from regular read-write registers to atomic and immediate snapshots. Moreover, our bounded full-information algorithm is asymptotically optimal for the iterated collect model and within a linear factor $n$ of optimal for the snapshot-based models.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2024

On the Bit Complexity of Iterated Memory

Computability, in the presence of asynchrony and failures, is one of the central questions in distributed computing. The celebrated asynchronous computability theorem (ACT) characterizes the computing power of the read-write shared-memory model through the geometric properties of its protocol complex: a combinatorial structure describing the states the model can reach via its finite executions. This characterization assumes that the memory is of unbounded capacity, in particular, it is able to store the exponentially growing states of the full-information protocol. In this paper, we tackle an orthogonal question: what is the minimal memory capacity that allows us to simulate a given number of rounds of the full-information protocol? In the iterated immediate snapshot model (IIS), we determine necessary and sufficient conditions on the number of bits an IIS element should be able to store so that the resulting protocol is equivalent, up to isomorphism, to the full-information protocol. Our characterization implies that $n\geq 3$ processes can simulate $r$ rounds of the full-information IIS protocol as long as the bit complexity per process is $\Theta(r n \log n)$. Two processes, however, can simulate any number of rounds of the full-information protocol using only $2$ bits per process, which implies, in particular, that just $2$ bits per process are sufficient to solve $\varepsilon$-agreement for arbitrarily small $\varepsilon$.

cs.DC↗