arXiv subjects

Guy Kaplan

Publications and source records attributed to Guy Kaplan.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Why Fine-Tuning Encourages Hallucinations and How to Fix It

Large language models are prone to hallucinating factually incorrect statements. A key source of these errors is exposure to new factual information through supervised fine-tuning (SFT), which can increase hallucinations w.r.t.~knowledge acquired during pre-training. Since these errors arise as a by-product of knowledge degradation, we explore whether established continual learning tools can mitigate them. We propose a self-distillation-based SFT method that facilitates effective factual learning while minimizing hallucinations w.r.t.~pre-existing knowledge by regularizing output-distribution drift. We also show that when new knowledge acquisition is unnecessary, suppressing factual plasticity by freezing parameter groups preserves task performance while reducing hallucinations. Lastly, we investigate the mechanism, contrasting capacity limitations, behavior cloning, and localized interference. Our experiments show that a main driver is interference among overlapping semantic representations, which self-distillation mitigates and an associative-memory model explains: forgetting grows with the overlap between new and stored facts.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2025

Vocab Diet: Reshaping the Vocabulary of LLMs via Vector Arithmetic

Large language models (LLMs) often encode word-form variation (e.g., walk vs. walked) as linear directions in the embedding space. However, standard tokenization algorithms treat such variants as distinct words with different vocabulary entries, quickly filling the size-capped token vocabulary with surface-form variation (e.g., walk, walking, Walk) at the expense of diversity and multilingual coverage. We show that many of these variations can be captured by transformation vectors: additive offsets that yield the appropriate word representation when applied to a base form embedding, in both the input and output spaces. Building on this, we propose a compact reshaping of the vocabulary: instead of assigning unique tokens to each surface form, we compose them from shared base form and transformation vectors (e.g., walked is walk+past tense). Our approach is lightweight, keeping the pretrained backbone frozen and only training small adaptation modules. We apply it across five languages and multiple LLMs in both pretraining and post-hoc adaptation, freeing 10-40% of vocabulary slots to be reallocated where tokenization is inefficient. Importantly, we do so while also expanding vocabulary coverage to out-of-vocabulary words, and with minimal impact on downstream performance. Our findings motivate a rethinking of vocabulary design, towards a representation that better matches the underlying structure of language and the practical needs of multilingual coverage.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2025

Follow the Flow: On Information Flow Across Textual Tokens in Text-to-Image Models

Text-to-image generation models suffer from alignment problems, where generated images fail to accurately capture the objects and relations in the text prompt. Prior work has focused on improving alignment by refining the diffusion process, ignoring the role of the text encoder, which guides the diffusion. In this work, we investigate how semantic information is distributed across token representations in text-to-image prompts, analyzing it at two levels: (1) in-item representation-whether individual tokens represent their lexical item (i.e., a word or expression conveying a single concept), and (2) cross-item interaction-whether information flows between tokens of different lexical items. We use patching techniques to uncover encoding patterns, and find that information is usually concentrated in only one or two of the item's tokens; for example, in the item ``San Francisco's Golden Gate Bridge'', the token ``Gate'' sufficiently captures the entire expression while the other tokens could effectively be discarded. Lexical items also tend to remain isolated; for instance, in the prompt ``a green dog'', the token ``dog'' encodes no visual information about ``green''. However, in some cases, items do influence each other's representation, often leading to misinterpretations-e.g., in the prompt ``a pool by a table'', the token ``pool'' represents a ``pool table'' after contextualization. Our findings highlight the critical role of token-level encoding in image generation, and demonstrate that simple interventions at the encoding stage can substantially improve alignment and generation quality.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2024

From Tokens to Words: On the Inner Lexicon of LLMs

Natural language is composed of words, but modern large language models (LLMs) process sub-words as input. A natural question raised by this discrepancy is whether LLMs encode words internally, and if so how. We present evidence that LLMs engage in an intrinsic detokenization process, where sub-word sequences are combined into coherent whole-word representations at their last token. Our experiments show that this process primarily takes place within the early and middle layers of the model. We further demonstrate its robustness to arbitrary splits (e.g., "cats" to "ca" and "ts"), typos, and importantly-to out-of-vocabulary words: when feeding the last token internal representations of such words to the model as input, it can "understand" them as the complete word despite never seeing such representations as input during training. Our findings suggest that LLMs maintain a latent vocabulary beyond the tokenizer's scope. These insights provide a practical, finetuning-free application for expanding the vocabulary of pre-trained models. By enabling the addition of new vocabulary words, we reduce input length and inference iterations, which reduces both space and model latency, with little to no loss in model accuracy.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2023

State of What Art? A Call for Multi-Prompt LLM Evaluation

Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have led to the development of various evaluation benchmarks. These benchmarks typically rely on a single instruction template for evaluating all LLMs on a specific task. In this paper, we comprehensively analyze the brittleness of results obtained via single-prompt evaluations across 6.5M instances, involving 20 different LLMs and 39 tasks from 3 benchmarks. To improve robustness of the analysis, we propose to evaluate LLMs with a set of diverse prompts instead. We discuss tailored evaluation metrics for specific use cases (e.g., LLM developers vs. developers interested in a specific downstream task), ensuring a more reliable and meaningful assessment of LLM capabilities. We then implement these criteria and conduct evaluations of multiple models, providing insights into the true strengths and limitations of current LLMs.

cs.CL↗