arXiv subjects

Håkan Burden

Publications and source records attributed to Håkan Burden.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

The Bidirectional Relationship Between XAI and Regulation: Operationalizing XAI for the AI Act

The EU AI Act makes explainability urgent for high-risk AI systems, yet most XAI research focuses on technical metrics rather than regulatory compliance. Understanding how legal requirements reshape XAI method design is challenging: the AI Act regulates organizational relationships (providers, deployers) using legal terminology, specifies obligations without concrete technical requirements, and underrepresents end-users--the very stakeholders whose needs human-centered XAI addresses. As regulations emerge globally, human-centered XAI practitioners face both a challenge and an opportunity: regulations pull XAI research toward real-world deployment, while practitioners can actively shape how explainability enables compliance. This establishes a bidirectional relationship. Our contribution is threefold. First, we provide the first interdisciplinary analysis of XAI's role in the AI Act--conducted by a team comprising AI Act legal experts, ML engineers, and requirements engineers--on a real-world clinical decision support system. Second, we systematically align XAI stakeholder roles with AI Act legal responsibilities, revealing where explainability methods address regulatory requirements versus where additional measures are necessary. Third, we identify three key opportunities for human-centered XAI practitioners: actively defining their roles in regulatory implementation; making the user-to-affected-party relationship explicit where regulations address only provider-deployer obligations; and enabling compliance while building multi-level trust--from regulators to affected parties.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2025

A sandbox study proposal for private and distributed health data analysis

This paper presents a sandbox study proposal focused on the distributed processing of personal health data within the Vinnova-funded SARDIN project. The project aims to develop the Health Data Bank (Hälsodatabanken in Swedish), a secure platform for research and innovation that complies with the European Health Data Space (EHDS) legislation. By minimizing the sharing and storage of personal data, the platform sends analysis tasks directly to the original data locations, avoiding centralization. This approach raises questions about data controller responsibilities in distributed environments and the anonymization status of aggregated statistical results. The study explores federated analysis, secure multi-party aggregation, and differential privacy techniques, informed by real-world examples from clinical research on Parkinson's disease, stroke rehabilitation, and wound analysis. To validate the proposed study, numerical experiments were conducted using four open-source datasets to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed methods. The results support the methods for the proposed sandbox study by demonstrating that differential privacy in combination with secure aggregation techniques significantly improves the privacy-utility trade-off.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2018

Involving External Stakeholders in Project Courses

Problem: The involvement of external stakeholders in capstone projects and project courses is desirable due to its potential positive effects on the students. Capstone projects particularly profit from the inclusion of an industrial partner to make the project relevant and help students acquire professional skills. In addition, an increasing push towards education that is aligned with industry and incorporates industrial partners can be observed. However, the involvement of external stakeholders in teaching moments can create friction and could, in the worst case, lead to frustration of all involved parties. Contribution: We developed a model that allows analysing the involvement of external stakeholders in university courses both in a retrospective fashion, to gain insights from past course instances, and in a constructive fashion, to plan the involvement of external stakeholders. Key Concepts: The conceptual model and the accompanying guideline guide the teachers in their analysis of stakeholder involvement. The model is comprised of several activities (define, execute, and evaluate the collaboration). The guideline provides questions that the teachers should answer for each of these activities. In the constructive use, the model allows teachers to define an action plan based on an analysis of potential stakeholders and the pedagogical objectives. In the retrospective use, the model allows teachers to identify issues that appeared during the project and their underlying causes. Drawing from ideas of the reflective practitioner, the model contains an emphasis on reflection and interpretation of the observations made by the teacher and other groups involved in the courses. Key Lessons: Applying the model retrospectively to a total of eight courses shows that it is possible to reveal hitherto implicit risks and assumptions and to gain a better insight into the interaction...

cs.CY↗