Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

H. C. Connolly, Jr.

Publications and source records attributed to H. C. Connolly, Jr..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Physical Analysis of Bennu Samples Reveals Regolith Production by Collisional Disruption on Near-Earth Asteroids

Owing to the extremely low gravity of small near-Earth asteroids (NEAs), it has been assumed that impact-generated rock fragments escape into space and thus do not contribute to the accumulation of regolith. However, centimeter-sized stones returned from the small NEA Bennu by NASA's OSIRIS-REx mission exhibit impact craters up to a few millimeters wide, implying that impact fragments and impact-processed rocks are retained despite the microgravity environment. To understand how, we combined detailed physical analysis of Bennu samples, laboratory experiments of impacts into simulant rocks, and 3D numerical simulations of disruptive impacts into boulders. We find that the majority (85% by mass) of impact fragments eject toward and penetrate the asteroid's weak, porous surface, leading to their retention. In addition, crater depth-to-diameter ratios (d/D) suggest that the Bennu samples (median crater d/D = 0.36 $\pm$ 0.1) are structurally representative of the asteroid's large boulders (median crater d/D = 0.33 $\pm$ 0.08, measured previously). Our analyses indicate that most of Bennu's surface rocks (those with diameters $\lesssim$ 20 m) could be products of in situ collisional disruption. This impact-driven mechanism of regolith production likely occurs on other small NEAs with highly porous surfaces.

astro-ph.EP↗

A Critical Examination of the X-Wind Model for Chondrule and Calcium-rich, Aluminum-rich Inclusion Formation and Radionuclide Production

Meteoritic data, especially regarding chondrules and calcium-rich, aluminum-rich inclusions (CAIs), and isotopic evidence for short-lived radionuclides (SLRs) in the solar nebula, potentially can constrain how planetary systems form. Intepretation of these data demands an astrophysical model, and the "X-wind" model of Shu et al. (1996) and collaborators has been advanced to explain the origin of chondrules, CAIs and SLRs. It posits that chondrules and CAIs were thermally processed < 0.1 AU from the protostar, then flung by a magnetocentrifugal outflow to the 2-3 AU region to be incorporated into chondrites. Here we critically examine key assumptions and predictions of the X-wind model. We find a number of internal inconsistencies: theory and observation show no solid material exists at 0.1 AU; particles at 0.1 AU cannot escape being accreted into the star; particles at 0.1 AU will collide at speeds high enough to destroy them; thermal sputtering will prevent growth of particles; and launching of particles in magnetocentrifugal outflows is not modeled, and may not be possible. We also identify a number of incorrect predictions of the X-wind model: the oxygen fugacity where CAIs form is orders of magnitude too oxidizing; chondrule cooling rates are orders of magnitude lower than those experienced by barred olivine chondrules; chondrule-matrix complementarity is not predicted; and the SLRs are not produced in their observed proportions. We conclude that the X-wind model is not relevant to chondrule and CAI formation and SLR production. We discuss more plausible models for chondrule and CAI formation and SLR production.

astro-ph.EP↗