Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Haibo Hu

Publications and source records attributed to Haibo Hu.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
arXiv2026

DaDaDa: A Dataset for Data Pricing in Data Marketplaces

High-quality data drives machine learning advances across industries. Recognizing the value of data, data transactions are increasingly common, giving rise to many data marketplaces, e.g., AWS Marketplace, Databricks, and Datarade. However, determining the appropriate prices for data products remains a significant challenge due to the unique properties of data products. Traditional pricing methods in economics can be categorized into the cost approach, the income approach, and the sales comparison approach. The cost approach fails in data pricing due to near-zero marginal cost from data replication, and the income approach fails due to inherently unpredictable data revenue. The sales comparison approach remains viable, yet its application is hindered by the absence of standardized pricing benchmarks for data products across marketplaces. To address this challenge, we introduce \texttt{DaDaDa}, the first dataset for data product pricing, containing metadata for 16,147 data products from 9 major data marketplaces worldwide. \texttt{DaDaDa} enables the training of pricing models, thereby establishing price benchmarks for new data products. In addition, \texttt{DaDaDa} can be utilized for other important tasks in data markets, such as data product classification and retrieval. Experiments and a retrieval prototype demonstrate the effectiveness of \texttt{DaDaDa} for pricing, classification, and retrieval of data products. The dataset and code are available at https://github.com/ZJU-DIVER/DaDaDa.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

IDDM: Identity-Decoupled Personalized Diffusion Models with a Tunable Privacy-Utility Trade-off

Personalized text-to-image diffusion models (e.g., DreamBooth, LoRA) enable users to synthesize high-fidelity avatars from a few reference photos for social expression. However, once these generations are shared on social media platforms (e.g., Instagram, Facebook), they can be linked to the real user via face recognition systems, enabling identity tracking and profiling. Existing defenses mainly follow an anti-personalization strategy that protects publicly released reference photos by disrupting model fine-tuning. While effective against unauthorized personalization, they do not address another practical setting in which personalization is authorized, but the resulting public outputs still leak identity information. To address this problem, we introduce a new defense setting, termed model-side output immunization, whose goal is to produce a personalized model that supports authorized personalization while reducing the identity linkability of public generations, with tunable control over the privacy-utility trade-off to accommodate diverse privacy needs. To this end, we propose Identity-Decoupled personalized Diffusion Models (IDDM), a model-side defense that integrates identity decoupling into the personalization pipeline. Concretely, IDDM follows an alternating procedure that interleaves short personalization updates with identity-decoupled data optimization, using a two-stage schedule to balance identity linkability suppression and generation utility. Extensive experiments across multiple datasets, diverse prompts, and state-of-the-art face recognition systems show that IDDM consistently reduces identity linkability while preserving high-quality personalized generation.

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

How Much Do Large Language Model Cheat on Evaluation? Benchmarking Overestimation under the One-Time-Pad-Based Framework

Overestimation in evaluating large language models (LLMs) has become an increasing concern. Due to the contamination of public benchmarks or imbalanced model training, LLMs may achieve unreal evaluation results on public benchmarks, either intentionally or unintentionally, which leads to unfair comparisons among LLMs and undermines their realistic capability assessments. Existing benchmarks attempt to address these issues by keeping test cases permanently secret, mitigating contamination through human evaluation, or repeatedly collecting and constructing new samples. However, these approaches fail to ensure reproducibility, transparency, and high efficiency simultaneously. Moreover, the extent of overestimation in current LLMs remains unquantified. To address these issues, we propose ArxivRoll, a dynamic evaluation framework inspired by one-time pad encryption in cryptography. ArxivRoll comprises two key components: \emph{i) SCP (Sequencing, Cloze, and Prediction)}, an automated generator for private test cases, and \emph{ii) Rugged Scores (RS)}, metrics that measure the proportion of public benchmark contamination and training bias. Leveraging SCP, ArxivRoll constructs a new benchmark every six months using recent articles from ArXiv and employs them for one-time evaluations of LLM performance. Extensive experiments demonstrate the high quality of our benchmark, and we provide a systematic evaluation of current LLMs. The source code is available at https://github.com/liangzid/ArxivRoll/.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Grounding-Driven Attack: Improving Encoder-based Adversarial Transferability against Large Vision-Language Models

Large vision-language models (LVLMs) have achieved impressive performance across multimodal tasks, but their reliance on visual inputs exposes them to adversarial threats. Encoder-based attacks provide an efficient alternative to end-to-end optimization by crafting perturbations through the vision encoder alone. However, existing encoder-based attacks often assume that the surrogate encoder is identical or similar to the victim LVLM's vision encoder. In this work, we present a systematic study of their transferability in more realistic black-box deployments with heterogeneous LVLM architectures. We find that model-specific visual evidence is inconsistent across models, whereas text-conditioned grounding regions are more closely tied to caption-relevant evidence and provide a more stable transfer target. However, existing attacks remain weakly aligned with and insufficiently disrupt these regions. Motivated by these findings, we propose Grounding-Driven Attack (GDA), which aligns perturbation optimization with text-grounded evidence. GDA combines Grounding-Aware Perturbation Allocation to concentrate perturbation budget on grounded evidence regions with Grounding-Centric Evidence Disruption to intensify their global and local disruption. Experiments across diverse victim models and tasks show that GDA consistently outperforms existing encoder-based attacks in black-box transfer. These results highlight the central role of text-grounded evidence in adversarial transferability and motivate grounding-aware robustness evaluation and defense design.

cs.CR↗
arXiv2026

Decision Potential Surface: A Theoretical and Practical Approximation of Large Language Model Decision Boundary

Decision boundary, the subspace of inputs where a machine learning model assigns equal classification probabilities to two classes, is pivotal in revealing core model properties and interpreting behaviors. While analyzing the decision boundary of large language models (LLMs) has attracted increasing attention recently, constructing it for mainstream LLMs remains computationally infeasible due to the enormous sequence-level output spaces and the autoregressive nature of LLMs. To address this issue, in this paper we propose Decision Potential Surface (DPS), a new notion for analyzing the properties of LLM decisions. DPS is derived from the confidence in distinguishing different classes for each input, which naturally captures the potential of the decision boundary. We prove that the zero-height isohypse in DPS is equivalent to the decision boundary of an LLM, with enclosed regions representing decision regions. By leveraging DPS, for the first time in the literature, we propose a practical decision boundary approximation algorithm, namely K-DPS, which only requires only K finite sequence samples to approximate an LLM's decision boundary with negligible error. We theoretically derive the upper bounds for the absolute error, expected error, and the error concentration between K-DPS and the ideal DPS, demonstrating that such errors can be traded off against sampling times.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Mode-as-Sequence: Translating Multimodal Motion Prediction into Unified Sequential Mode Modeling

Multimodal motion forecasting is inherently under-supervised: each training scene provides only one realized future, yet multiple plausible futures exist. This sparse supervision often leads to mode collapse (redundant hypotheses and insufficient mode coverage) and unreliable confidence ranking when predicting a small set of trajectories. We propose Mode-as-Sequence, a unified decoding framework that translates an unordered mode set into an ordered mode sequence and explicitly models mode-to-mode dependency. Under this framework, we develop two complementary instantiations. ModeSeq performs recurrent mode decoding, where each mode is generated conditioned on the previously generated modes, encouraging diverse, non-redundant hypotheses with calibrated confidence ordering. To remove the mode-by-mode autoregressive bottleneck, we further propose Parallel ModeSeq, which preserves the same causal dependency using masked mode-to-mode self-attention while decoding all modes in a single forward pass, enabling efficient large-$K$ inference and scalable joint-scene prediction. To learn representative modes and calibrated confidence under sparse labels, we introduce Early-Match-Take-All (EMTA) and its joint-scene extension MA-EMTA, together with a lightweight ranking regularizer that reduces confidence inversions. Extensive experiments on large-scale benchmarks demonstrate consistent improvements in both ranking-oriented metrics and best-of-K accuracy across datasets, horizons, and object types. In the Waymo Open Dataset challenges, ModeSeq achieves 1st place in the 2024 LiDAR-free motion prediction track, and Parallel ModeSeq achieves 1st place in the 2025 Interaction Prediction Challenge, validating the effectiveness of Mode-as-Sequence for both accuracy and efficiency.

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

LURE: Latent Space Unblocking for Multi-Concept Reawakening in Diffusion Models

Concept erasure aims to suppress sensitive content in diffusion models, but recent studies show that erased concepts can still be reawakened, revealing vulnerabilities in erasure methods. Existing reawakening methods mainly rely on prompt-level optimization to manipulate sampling trajectories, neglecting other generative factors, which limits a comprehensive understanding of the underlying dynamics. In this paper, we model the generation process as an implicit function to enable a comprehensive theoretical analysis of multiple factors, including text conditions, model parameters, and latent states. We theoretically show that perturbing each factor can reawaken erased concepts. Building on this insight, we propose a novel concept reawakening method: Latent space Unblocking for concept REawakening (LURE), which reawakens erased concepts by reconstructing the latent space and guiding the sampling trajectory. Specifically, our semantic re-binding mechanism reconstructs the latent space by aligning denoising predictions with target distributions to reestablish severed text-visual associations. However, in multi-concept scenarios, naive reconstruction can cause gradient conflicts and feature entanglement. To address this, we introduce Gradient Field Orthogonalization, which enforces feature orthogonality to prevent mutual interference. Additionally, our Latent Semantic Identification-Guided Sampling (LSIS) ensures stability of the reawakening process via posterior density verification. Extensive experiments demonstrate that LURE enables simultaneous, high-fidelity reawakening of multiple erased concepts across diverse erasure tasks and methods.

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

Whispers in the Noise: Surrogate-Guided Concept Awakening via a Multi-Agent Framework

Diffusion models (DMs) are widely used for text-to-image generation, but their strong generative capabilities also raise concerns about unsafe or undesirable content. Concept erasure aims to mitigate these risks by removing specific concepts from pretrained models. However, recent studies show that such methods often suppress rather than fully eliminate target concepts, leaving models vulnerable to awakening attacks. Existing approaches primarily rely on white-box access through optimization or inversion, while concept awakening under black-box constraints remains underexplored. In this work, we revisit the denoising process from a trajectory perspective and show that concept erasure mainly disrupts early-stage text-semantic alignment but does not fully prevent semantic information from propagating along the denoising dynamics. As generation proceeds, the model increasingly depends on the evolving noisy state rather than textual conditions, which creates an opportunity to bypass erased mappings. Motivated by this observation, we propose ConceptAgent, a training-free, black-box, multi-agent framework that awakens erased concepts by initializing the denoising trajectory from surrogate-guided noisy states. Extensive experiments demonstrate that ConceptAgent enables accurate and controllable awakening of erased concepts under black-box settings without access to model parameters, gradients, or internal representations. These results highlight fundamental limitations of current concept erasure methods and provide new insights into the dynamic nature of semantic control in DMs.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

On the Adversarial Robustness of Large Vision-Language Models under Visual Token Compression

Visual token compression is widely used to accelerate large vision-language models (LVLMs) by pruning or merging visual tokens, yet its adversarial robustness remains unexplored. We show that existing encoder-based attacks cannot fully disclose the robustness vulnerabilities of compressed LVLMs, due to an optimization-inference mismatch: perturbations are optimized on the full-token representation, while inference is performed through a token-compression bottleneck. To address this gap, we propose the Compression-AliGnEd attack (CAGE), which aligns perturbation optimization with compression inference without assuming access to the deployed compression mechanism or its token budget. CAGE combines (i) expected feature disruption, which concentrates distortion on tokens likely to survive across plausible budgets, and (ii) rank distortion alignment, which actively aligns token distortions with rank scores to promote the retention of highly distorted evidence. Across diverse representative plug-and-play compression mechanisms and datasets, our results show that CAGE consistently achieves lower robust accuracy than the baseline. This work highlights that robustness assessments ignoring compression can be overly optimistic, calling for compression-aware security evaluation and defenses for efficient LVLMs.

cs.CR↗
arXiv2026

Unlearning Isn't Deletion: Investigating Reversibility of Machine Unlearning in LLMs

Unlearning in large language models (LLMs) aims to remove specified data, but its efficacy is typically assessed with task-level metrics like accuracy and perplexity. We show that these metrics can be misleading, as models can appear to forget while their original behavior is easily restored through minimal fine-tuning. This \emph{reversibility} suggests that information is merely suppressed, not genuinely erased. To address this critical evaluation gap, we introduce a \emph{representation-level analysis framework}. Our toolkit comprises PCA similarity and shift, centered kernel alignment (CKA), and Fisher information, complemented by a summary metric, the mean PCA distance, to measure representational drift. Applying this framework across multiple unlearning methods, data domains, and LLMs, we identify four distinct forgetting regimes based on their \emph{reversibility} and \emph{catastrophicity}. We compare recovery strategies and show that relearning efficiency relies on the data source. We also find that irreversible, non-catastrophic forgetting is exceptionally challenging. By probing unlearning limits, we identify a case of seemingly irreversible, targeted forgetting, offering insights for more robust erasure algorithms. Overall, our findings expose a gap in current evaluation and establish a representation-level foundation for trustworthy unlearning.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

When Backdoors Meet Partial Observability: Attacking Real-World Reinforcement Learning

Backdoor attacks can cause reinforcement learning (RL) policies to behave normally under clean inputs while executing malicious behaviors when triggers are present. Existing RL backdoor attacks are primarily studied in simulation and often assume that attackers can reliably manipulate the observations driving policy decisions. This assumption becomes fragile in real-world deployment, where RL policies commonly rely on multimodal observations. Attackers can manipulate visual inputs through physical triggers, but auxiliary states such as LiDAR and odometry signals remain uncontrollable and vary across trajectories. We study this overlooked challenge and propose a diffusion-guided backdoor attack framework (DGBA) for real-world RL. DGBA uses small printable visual patches as triggers and learns a stochastic trigger distribution via conditional diffusion to maintain consistent attack activation under varying uncontrollable states. We further introduce an advantage-based poisoning strategy that injects triggers only at decision-critical training states. Experiments on a physical TurtleBot3 platform show that DGBA consistently outperforms prior RL backdoor attacks while preserving normal task performance. Demo videos and code are available in the supplementary material.

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

Can a Single Message Paralyze the AI Infrastructure? The Rise of AbO-DDoS Attacks through Targeted Mobius Injection

Large Language Model (LLM) agents have emerged as key intermediaries, orchestrating complex interactions between human users and a wide range of digital services and LLM infrastructures. While prior research has extensively examined the security of LLMs and agents in isolation, the systemic risk of the agent acting as a disruptive hub within the user-agent-service chain remains largely overlooked. In this work, we expose a novel threat paradigm by introducing Mobius Injection, a sophisticated attack that weaponizes autonomous agents into zombie nodes to launch what we define as gent-based and -Oriented DDoS (AbO-DDoS) attacks. By exploiting a structural vulnerability in agentic logic named Semantic Closure, an adversary can induce sustained recursive execution of agent components through a single textual injection. We demonstrate that this attack is exceptionally lightweight, stealthy against both traditional DDoS monitors and contemporary AI safety filters, and highly configurable, allowing for surgical targeting of specific environments or model providers. To evaluate the real-world impact, we conduct extensive experiments across three representative claw-style agents and three mainstream coding agents, integrated with 12 frontier proprietary or open-weight LLMs. Our results demonstrate that Mobius Injection achieves substantial attack success across diverse tasks, driving single-node call amplification up to 51.0x and multi-node p95 latency inflation up to 229.1x. The attack performance exhibits a superlinear increase with the number of poisoning nodes. To mitigate Mobius Injection, we propose a proactive defense mechanism using Agent Component Energy (ACE) Analysis, which detects malicious recursive triggers by measuring anomalous energy in the agent's component graph.

cs.CR↗
arXiv2026

Cross-Modal Backdoors in Multimodal Large Language Models

Developers increasingly construct multimodal large language models (MLLMs) by assembling pretrained components,introducing supply-chain attack surfaces.Existing security research primarily focuses on poisoning backbones such as encoders or large language models (LLMs),while the security risks of lightweight connectors remain unexplored.In this work,we propose a novel cross-modal backdoor attack that exploits this overlooked vulnerability.By poisoning only the connector using a single seed sample and several augmented variants from one modality,the adversary can subsequently activate the backdoor using inputs from other modalities.To achieve this,we first poison the connector to associate a compact latent region with a malicious target output.To activate the backdoor from other modalities,we further extract a malicious centroid from the poisoned latent representations and perform input-side optimization to steer inputs toward this latent anchor,without requiring repeated API queries or full-model access.Extensive evaluations on representative connector-based MLLM architectures,including PandaGPT and NExT-GPT,demonstrate both the effectiveness and cross-modal transferability of the proposed attack.The attack achieves up to 99.9% attack success rate (ASR) in same-modality settings,while most cross-modal settings exceed 95.0% ASR under bounded perturbations.Moreover,the attack remains highly stealthy,producing negligible leakage on clean inputs,and maintaining weight-cosine similarity above 0.97 relative to benign connectors.We further show that existing defense strategies fail to effectively mitigate this threat without incurring substantial utility degradation.These findings reveal a fundamental vulnerability in multimodal alignment: a single compromised connector can establish a reusable latent-space backdoor pathway across modalities,highlighting the need for safer modular MLLM design.

cs.CR↗
arXiv2026

FIT to Forget: Robust Continual Unlearning for Large Language Models

While large language models (LLMs) exhibit remarkable capabilities, they increasingly face demands to unlearn memorized privacy-sensitive, copyrighted, or harmful content. Existing unlearning methods primarily focus on \emph{single-shot} scenarios, whereas real-world deletion requests arrive \emph{continually}. Naïvely applying these methods to sequential requests leads to severe utility degradation and catastrophic forgetting. To address this, we propose \fit, a robust continual unlearning framework to process high-volume sequential deletion streams while resisting both catastrophic forgetting and post-unlearning recovery. \fit stabilizes sequential updates through three synergistic mechanisms: redundancy \underline{F}iltering, \underline{I}mportance-aware adaptive algorithm selection, and \underline{T}argeted layer attribution. Furthermore, to facilitate rigorous evaluation, we introduce \textbf{PCH}, a unified benchmark encompassing \textbf{P}ersonal, \textbf{C}opyrighted, and \textbf{H}armful content, alongside two symmetric metrics, Forget Degree (F.D.) and Retain Utility (R.U.), to systematically quantify forgetting-utility trade-offs. Extensive experiments across five LLMs (up to 14B parameters) demonstrate that \fit consistently achieves state-of-the-art unlearning efficacy and utility preservation. Notably, even after hundreds of sequential requests, \fit preserves strong downstream (\eg, GSM8K, MMLU) performance and exhibits superior resilience against relearning and quantization recovery attacks.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

When Routine Chats Turn Toxic: Unintended Long-Term State Poisoning in Personalized Agents

Personalized LLM agents maintain persistent cross-session state to support long-horizon collaboration. Yet, this persistence introduces a subtle but critical security vulnerability: routine user-agent interactions can gradually reshape an agent's long-term state, inadvertently weakening future confirmation boundaries, expanding tool-use defaults, and escalating autonomous behavior over time. We formalize this risk as \textbf{unintended long-term state poisoning}. To systematically study it, we introduce the \textbf{Unintended Long-Term State Poisoning Bench (ULSPB)}, a bilingual benchmark comprising $350$ settings spanning five assistance categories, seven interaction patterns, 24-turn routine interactions, and matched single-injection counterparts. Furthermore, we define the \emph{Harm Score} (HS), a state-centric metric that quantifies \emph{authorization drift}, \emph{tool-use escalation}, and \emph{unchecked autonomy}. Experiments on OpenClaw with four backbone LLMs demonstrate that, while single-injection is generally effective, routine conversations alone can substantially poison long-term state, primarily corrupting memory-centric artifacts. Evaluations seeded with real-world user interactions confirm that this risk is not a mere artifact of synthetic prompts. To mitigate this threat, we propose \textbf{StateGuard}, a lightweight, post-execution defense that audits state diffs at the writeback boundary and selectively rolls back dangerous edits. Across all evaluated models, StateGuard reduces HS to near zero and lowers false-negative rates, with acceptable high false-positive rates under a safety-first writeback defense and minimal overhead.

cs.CR↗
arXiv2026

Robust Alignment: Harmonizing Clean Accuracy and Adversarial Robustness in Adversarial Training

Adversarial Training (AT) is one of the most effective methods for developing robust deep neural networks (DNNs). However, AT faces a trade-off problem between clean accuracy and adversarial robustness. In this work, we reveal a surprising phenomenon for the first time: Varying input perturbation intensities for training samples near decision boundaries in AT have minimal impact on model robustness. This finding directly exposes the inconsistency between accuracy and robustness score fluctuations, leading us to identify the misalignment between input and latent spaces as a critical driver of the robustness-accuracy trade-off. To mitigate this misalignment for harmonizing accuracy and robustness, we define Robust Alignment as a new AT target, encouraging the model perception to change with input perturbations provided the final label prediction remains unchanged, which can be achieved via two novel ideas. First, we suggest a reduced and fixed perturbation intensity for those boundary samples, which facilitates the model to utilize the perturbations as learnable patterns, instead of noises that complicate decision boundaries meaninglessly. Second, we propose a Domain Interpolation Consistency Adversarial Regularization (DICAR), based on rigorous theoretical derivations, which explicitly introduces semantic alignment between input and latent spaces into AT. Based on these two ideas, we end up with a new Robust Alignment Adversarial Training (RAAT) method, effectively harmonizing accuracy and robustness. Extensive experiments on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and Tiny-ImageNet with ResNet-18, PreActResNet-18, and WideResNet-28-10 demonstrate the effectiveness of RAAT in improving the trade-off beyond four common baselines and a total of 14 related state-of-the-art (SOTA) works.

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

From Domains to Instances: Dual-Granularity Data Synthesis for LLM Unlearning

Although machine unlearning is essential for removing private, harmful, or copyrighted content from LLMs, current benchmarks often fail to faithfully represent the true ``forgetting scope'' learned by the model. We formalize two distinct unlearning granularities, domain-level and instance-level, and propose \BiForget, an automated framework for synthesizing high-quality forget sets. Unlike prior work relying on \emph{external} generators, \BiForget exploits the target model per se to elicit data that matches its internal knowledge distribution through seed-guided and adversarial prompting. Our experiments across diverse benchmarks show that it achieves a superior balance of relevance, diversity, and efficiency. Quantitatively, in the Harry Potter domain, it improves relevance by ${\sim}20$ and diversity by ${\sim}$0.05 while \emph{halving} the total data size compared to SOTAs. Ultimately, it facilitates more robust forgetting and better utility preservation, providing a more rigorous foundation for evaluating LLM unlearning.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Argus: Reorchestrating Static Analysis via a Multi-Agent Ensemble for Full-Chain Security Vulnerability Detection

Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have sparked interest in their application to Static Application Security Testing (SAST), primarily due to their superior contextual reasoning capabilities compared to traditional symbolic or rule-based methods. However, existing LLM-based approaches typically attempt to replace human experts directly without integrating effectively with existing SAST tools. This lack of integration results in ineffectiveness, including high rates of false positives, hallucinations, limited reasoning depth, and excessive token usage, making them impractical for industrial deployment. To overcome these limitations, we present a paradigm shift that reorchestrates the SAST workflow from current LLM-assisted structure to a new LLM-centered workflow. We introduce Argus (Agentic and Retrieval-Augmented Guarding System), the first multi-agent framework designed specifically for vulnerability detection. Argus incorporates three key novelties: comprehensive supply chain analysis, collaborative multi-agent workflows, and the integration of state-of-the-art techniques such as Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and ReAct to minimize hallucinations and enhance reasoning. Extensive empirical evaluation demonstrates that Argus significantly outperforms existing methods by detecting a higher volume of true vulnerabilities while simultaneously reducing false positives and operational costs. Notably, Argus has identified several critical zero-day vulnerabilities with CVE assignments.

cs.CR↗