Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Hamidreza Amini Khorasgani

Publications and source records attributed to Hamidreza Amini Khorasgani.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Solving polynomial inequalities over spaces of convex sets and applications

We develop a symbolic elimination theory for finite systems of recursive containment inequalities whose unknowns are convex subsets of a finite-dimensional real vector space. The right-hand sides are formal expressions generated from variables and parameters by convex linear combinations, finite union, and a positive geometric join encoding strict convex combinations. We prove that every parameter assignment has a unique smallest convex-set-valued solution and give a finite Gaussian-elimination-type procedure that eliminates the unknowns while preserving this solution and produces parameter-only expressions for its coordinate sets. More generally, let $\mathcal B$ be a family of subsets containing $\emptyset$ and closed under finite unions, nonnegative dilation, Minkowski sums, positive geometric joins, and convex hulls. If all parameter sets lie in $\mathcal B$, then every coordinate set of the smallest solution lies in $\mathcal B$; when these operations are effective, so is the resulting description. In particular, if the parameters are finite unions of hemihedra---where a hemihedron is a bounded convex semi-linear set, equivalently a convex finite union of relative interiors of polytopes---then each coordinate set is a hemihedron and admits a quantifier-free semi-linear description. We apply this theory to lamination hulls. For \[ V=U\oplus\bigoplus_{i=1}^{k}W_i,\qquad \dim W_i=1,\qquad Λ=\bigcup_{i=1}^{k}(U+W_i), \] we prove that the lamination hull $G_Λ^{(\infty)}(S)$ of every finite $S\subset V$ is semi-algebraic and effectively computable by a quantifier-free formula over the reals.

math.CO↗

Estimating Gaps in Martingales and Applications to Coin-Tossing: Constructions and Hardness

Consider designing a distributed coin-tossing protocol for n processors such that the probability of heads is X0 in [0,1], and an adversary can reset one processor to change the distribution of the final outcome. For X0=1/2, in the non-cryptographic setting, Blum's majority protocol is $\frac1{\sqrt{2πn}}$ insecure. For computationally bounded adversaries and any X0 in [0,1], the protocol of Moran,Naor,Segev (2009) is only O(1/n) insecure. In this paper, we study discrete-time martingales (X0,X1,..,Xn) such that Xi in [0,1], for all i in {0,..,n}, and Xn in {0,1}. In particular, for any X0 in [0,1], we construct martingales that yield $\frac12\sqrt{\frac{X_0(1-X_0)}{n}}$ insecure coin-tossing protocols with n-bit communication; irrespective of the number of bits required to represent the output distribution. Note that for sufficiently small X0, we achieve higher security than Moran et al's protocol even against computationally unbounded adversaries. For X0=1/2, our protocol requires only 40% of the processors to obtain the same security as the majority protocol. We introduce a new inductive technique that uses geometric transformations to estimate the large gaps in these martingales. For any X0 in [0,1], we show that there exists a stopping time $T$ such that $\mathbb{E}[|{X_T-X_{T-1}}|]\geq\frac2{\sqrt{2n-1}}\cdot X_0(1-X_0)$. The inductive technique also constructs martingales that demonstrate the optimality of our bound - we construct optimal martingales such that any $T$ has$\mathbb{E}[|{X_T-X_{T-1}}|]\leq\frac1{\sqrt{n}}\cdot\sqrt{X_0(1-X_0)}$. Our lower-bound holds for all X0 in [0,1]; while the previous bound of Cleve,Impagliazzo (1993) exists only for positive constant X0. Our approach only employs elementary techniques and avoids the complex probabilistic tools inherent to the approaches of Cleve,Impagliazzo (1993) and Beimel,Haitner,Makriyannis,Omri (2018).

cs.DM↗