arXiv subjects

Han-Hsuan Lin

Publications and source records attributed to Han-Hsuan Lin.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Small-Bias Quantum Approximate Counting via the Multiplicative Adversary Method

We study the two-weight decision version of quantum approximate counting: given oracle access to $x\in\{0,1\}^N$, distinguish $|x|=M$ from $|x|=M+\Delta$ with success probability $1/2+\zeta$. Using the multiplicative adversary method, we prove $\Omega\left(\max\left\{\zeta\sqrt{(N-M)(M+\Delta)}/\Delta,\sqrt{\zeta N/\Delta}\right\}\right)$. The same parameter dependence follows from the polynomial-method characterization of the two-layer symmetric function by Podder, Yao, and Ye. Our contribution is a multiplicative-adversary derivation that tracks the progress produced by individual oracle queries. For the first term, after complementing the input if necessary, we assume $M+\Delta\le N-M$. We use the Hamming-layer subspaces from the eigenspace method of Ambainis, Spalek, and de Wolf and compose their adjacent-layer unitary maps to relate the two nonadjacent promise layers. After fixing the queried coordinate, the analysis block-diagonalizes into four-dimensional subspaces. An exact calculation of the one-query progress ratio gives the first lower bound. The same estimate also implies $\left\|(I-\widehat{\Pi}_{\mathrm{bad}})\lvert\Psi^T\rangle\right\|^2=O\left(T^2\Delta^2/((N-M)(M+\Delta))\right)$ for the coherent input superposition used in the adversary argument. For the second term, we prove directly using a three-eigenvalue multiplicative adversary that unique OR on $n$ bits with success probability $1/2+\zeta$ requires $\Omega(\sqrt{\zeta n})$ queries, and then reduce unique OR to the two-weight counting problem.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2025

Optimizing sparse quantum state preparation with measurement and feedforward

Quantum state preparation (QSP) is a key component in many quantum algorithms. In particular, the problem of sparse QSP (SQSP) $\unicode{x2013}$ the task of preparing the states with only a small number of non-zero amplitudes $\unicode{x2013}$ has garnered significant attention in recent years. In this work, we focus on reducing the circuit depth of SQSP with limited number of ancilla qubits. We present two SQSP algorithms: one with depth $O(n\log d)$, and another that reduces depth to $O(n)$. The latter leverages mid-circuit measurement and feedforward, where intermediate measurement outcomes are used to control subsequent quantum operations. Both constructions have size $O(dn)$ and use $O(d)$ ancilla qubits. Compared to the state-of-the-art SQSP algorithm in arXiv:2108.06150, which allows an arbitrary number of ancilla qubits $m>0$, both of our algorithms achieve lower circuit depth when $m=d$.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2025

Getting almost all the bits from a quantum random access code

A quantum random access code (QRAC) is a map $x\mapsto\rho_x$ that encodes $n$-bit strings $x$ into $m$-qubit quantum states $\rho_x$, in a way that allows us to recover any one bit of $x$ with success probability $\geq p$. The measurement on $\rho_x$ that is used to recover, say, $x_1$ may destroy all the information about the other bits; this is in fact what happens in the well-known QRAC that encodes $n=2$ bits into $m=1$ qubits. Does this generalize to large $n$, i.e., could there exist QRACs that are so "obfuscated" that one cannot get much more than one bit out of them? Here we show that this is not the case: for every QRAC there exists a measurement that (with high probability) recovers the full $n$-bit string $x$ up to small Hamming distance, even for the worst-case $x$.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2024

Near-Optimal Quantum Algorithm for Finding the Longest Common Substring between Run-Length Encoded Strings

We give a near-optimal quantum algorithm for the longest common substring (LCS) problem between two run-length encoded (RLE) strings, with the assumption that the prefix-sums of the run-lengths are given. Our algorithm costs $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n^{2/3}/d^{1/6-o(1)}\cdot\mathrm{polylog}(\tilde{n}))$ time, while the query lower bound for the problem is $\tilde{\Omega}(n^{2/3}/d^{1/6})$, where $n$ and $\tilde{n}$ are the encoded and decoded length of the inputs, respectively, and $d$ is the encoded length of the LCS. We justify the use of prefix-sum oracles for two reasons. First, we note that creating the prefix-sum oracle only incurs a constant overhead in the RLE compression. Second, we show that, without the oracles, there is a $\Omega(n/\log^2n)$ lower bound on the quantum query complexity of finding the LCS given two RLE strings due to a reduction of $\mathsf{PARITY}$ to the problem. With a small modification, our algorithm also solves the longest repeated substring problem for an RLE string.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2023

A sublinear time quantum algorithm for longest common substring problem between run-length encoded strings

We give a sublinear quantum algorithm for the longest common substring (LCS) problem on the run-length encoded (RLE) inputs, under the assumption that the prefix-sums of the runs are given. Our algorithm costs $\tilde{O}(n^{5/6})\cdot O(\mathrm{polylog}(\tilde{n}))$ time, where $n$ and $\tilde{n}$ are the encoded and decoded length of the inputs, respectively. We justify the use of the prefix-sum oracles by showing that, without the oracles, there is a $\Omega(n/\log^2n)$ lower-bound on the quantum query complexity of finding LCS given two RLE strings due to a reduction of $\mathsf{PARITY}$ to the problem.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2023

Efficient learning of $t$-doped stabilizer states with single-copy measurements

One of the primary objectives in the field of quantum state learning is to develop algorithms that are time-efficient for learning states generated from quantum circuits. Earlier investigations have demonstrated time-efficient algorithms for states generated from Clifford circuits with at most $\log(n)$ non-Clifford gates. However, these algorithms necessitate multi-copy measurements, posing implementation challenges in the near term due to the requisite quantum memory. On the contrary, using solely single-qubit measurements in the computational basis is insufficient in learning even the output distribution of a Clifford circuit with one additional $T$ gate under reasonable post-quantum cryptographic assumptions. In this work, we introduce an efficient quantum algorithm that employs only nonadaptive single-copy measurement to learn states produced by Clifford circuits with a maximum of $O(\log n)$ non-Clifford gates, filling a gap between the previous positive and negative results.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2023

On the Impossibility of General Parallel Fast-forwarding of Hamiltonian Simulation

Hamiltonian simulation is one of the most important problems in the field of quantum computing. There have been extended efforts on designing algorithms for faster simulation, and the evolution time $T$ for the simulation turns out to largely affect algorithm runtime. While there are some specific types of Hamiltonians that can be fast-forwarded, i.e., simulated within time $o(T)$, for large enough classes of Hamiltonians (e.g., all local/sparse Hamiltonians), existing simulation algorithms require running time at least linear in the evolution time $T$. On the other hand, while there exist lower bounds of $\Omega(T)$ circuit size for some large classes of Hamiltonian, these lower bounds do not rule out the possibilities of Hamiltonian simulation with large but "low-depth" circuits by running things in parallel. Therefore, it is intriguing whether we can achieve fast Hamiltonian simulation with the power of parallelism. In this work, we give a negative result for the above open problem, showing that sparse Hamiltonians and (geometrically) local Hamiltonians cannot be parallelly fast-forwarded. In the oracle model, we prove that there are time-independent sparse Hamiltonians that cannot be simulated via an oracle circuit of depth $o(T)$. In the plain model, relying on the random oracle heuristic, we show that there exist time-independent local Hamiltonians and time-dependent geometrically local Hamiltonians that cannot be simulated via an oracle circuit of depth $o(T/n^c)$, where the Hamiltonians act on $n$-qubits, and $c$ is a constant.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2021

On relating one-way classical and quantum communication complexities

Communication complexity is the amount of communication needed to compute a function when the function inputs are distributed over multiple parties. In its simplest form, one-way communication complexity, Alice and Bob compute a function $f(x,y)$, where $x$ is given to Alice and $y$ is given to Bob, and only one message from Alice to Bob is allowed. A fundamental question in quantum information is the relationship between one-way quantum and classical communication complexities, i.e., how much shorter the message can be if Alice is sending a quantum state instead of bit strings? We make some progress towards this question with the following results. Let $f: \mathcal{X} \times \mathcal{Y} \rightarrow \mathcal{Z} \cup \{\bot\}$ be a partial function and $\mu$ be a distribution with support contained in $f^{-1}(\mathcal{Z})$. Denote $d=|\mathcal{Z}|$. Let $\mathsf{R}^{1,\mu}_\epsilon(f)$ be the classical one-way communication complexity of $f$; $\mathsf{Q}^{1,\mu}_\epsilon(f)$ be the quantum one-way communication complexity of $f$ and $\mathsf{Q}^{1,\mu, *}_\epsilon(f)$ be the entanglement-assisted quantum one-way communication complexity of $f$, each with distributional error (average error over $\mu$) at most $\epsilon$. We show: 1) If $\mu$ is a product distribution, $\eta > 0$ and $0 \leq \epsilon \leq 1-1/d$, then, $$\mathsf{R}^{1,\mu}_{2\epsilon -d\epsilon^2/(d-1)+ \eta}(f) \leq 2\mathsf{Q}^{1,\mu, *}_{\epsilon}(f) + O(\log\log (1/\eta))\enspace.$$ 2)If $\mu$ is a non-product distribution and $\mathcal{Z}=\{ 0,1\}$, then $\forall \epsilon, \eta > 0$ such that $\epsilon/\eta + \eta < 0.5$, $$\mathsf{R}^{1,\mu}_{3\eta}(f) = O(\mathsf{Q}^{1,\mu}_{{\epsilon}}(f) \cdot \mathsf{CS}(f)/\eta^3)\enspace,$$ where \[\mathsf{CS}(f) = \max_{y} \min_{z\in\{0,1\}} \vert \{x~|~f(x,y)=z\} \vert \enspace.\]

cs.CC↗

arXiv2020

Constant-round Blind Classical Verification of Quantum Sampling

In a recent breakthrough, Mahadev constructed a classical verification of quantum computation (CVQC) protocol for a classical client to delegate decision problems in BQP to an untrusted quantum prover under computational assumptions. In this work, we explore further the feasibility of CVQC with the more general sampling problems in BQP and with the desirable blindness property. We contribute affirmative solutions to both as follows. (1) Motivated by the sampling nature of many quantum applications (e.g., quantum algorithms for machine learning and quantum supremacy tasks), we initiate the study of CVQC for quantum sampling problems (denoted by SampBQP). More precisely, in a CVQC protocol for a SampBQP problem, the prover and the verifier are given an input $x\in \{0,1\}^n$ and a quantum circuit $C$, and the goal of the classical client is to learn a sample from the output $z \leftarrow C(x)$ up to a small error, from its interaction with an untrusted prover. We demonstrate its feasibility by constructing a four-message CVQC protocol for SampBQP based on the quantum Learning With Error assumption. (2) The blindness of CVQC protocols refers to a property of the protocol where the prover learns nothing, and hence is blind, about the client's input. It is a highly desirable property that has been intensively studied for the delegation of quantum computation. We provide a simple yet powerful generic compiler that transforms any CVQC protocol to a blind one while preserving its completeness and soundness errors as well as the number of rounds. Applying our compiler to (a parallel repetition of) Mahadev's CVQC protocol for BQP and our CVQC protocol for SampBQP yields the first constant-round blind CVQC protocol for BQP and SampBQP respectively, with negligible and inverse polynomial soundness errors respectively, and negligible completeness errors.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2019

On the Quantum Complexity of Closest Pair and Related Problems

The closest pair problem is a fundamental problem of computational geometry: given a set of $n$ points in a $d$-dimensional space, find a pair with the smallest distance. A classical algorithm taught in introductory courses solves this problem in $O(n\log n)$ time in constant dimensions (i.e., when $d=O(1)$). This paper asks and answers the question of the problem's quantum time complexity. Specifically, we give an $\tilde{O}(n^{2/3})$ algorithm in constant dimensions, which is optimal up to a polylogarithmic factor by the lower bound on the quantum query complexity of element distinctness. The key to our algorithm is an efficient history-independent data structure that supports quantum interference. In $\mathrm{polylog}(n)$ dimensions, no known quantum algorithms perform better than brute force search, with a quadratic speedup provided by Grover's algorithm. To give evidence that the quadratic speedup is nearly optimal, we initiate the study of quantum fine-grained complexity and introduce the Quantum Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (QSETH), which is based on the assumption that Grover's algorithm is optimal for CNF-SAT when the clause width is large. We show that the na\"{i}ve Grover approach to closest pair in higher dimensions is optimal up to an $n^{o(1)}$ factor unless QSETH is false. We also study the bichromatic closest pair problem and the orthogonal vectors problem, with broadly similar results.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2019

Sampling-based sublinear low-rank matrix arithmetic framework for dequantizing quantum machine learning

We present an algorithmic framework for quantum-inspired classical algorithms on close-to-low-rank matrices, generalizing the series of results started by Tang's breakthrough quantum-inspired algorithm for recommendation systems [STOC'19]. Motivated by quantum linear algebra algorithms and the quantum singular value transformation (SVT) framework of Gily\'en, Su, Low, and Wiebe [STOC'19], we develop classical algorithms for SVT that run in time independent of input dimension, under suitable quantum-inspired sampling assumptions. Our results give compelling evidence that in the corresponding QRAM data structure input model, quantum SVT does not yield exponential quantum speedups. Since the quantum SVT framework generalizes essentially all known techniques for quantum linear algebra, our results, combined with sampling lemmas from previous work, suffice to generalize all recent results about dequantizing quantum machine learning algorithms. In particular, our classical SVT framework recovers and often improves the dequantization results on recommendation systems, principal component analysis, supervised clustering, support vector machines, low-rank regression, and semidefinite program solving. We also give additional dequantization results on low-rank Hamiltonian simulation and discriminant analysis. Our improvements come from identifying the key feature of the quantum-inspired input model that is at the core of all prior quantum-inspired results: $\ell^2$-norm sampling can approximate matrix products in time independent of their dimension. We reduce all our main results to this fact, making our exposition concise, self-contained, and intuitive.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2019

Quantum-inspired sublinear algorithm for solving low-rank semidefinite programming

Semidefinite programming (SDP) is a central topic in mathematical optimization with extensive studies on its efficient solvers. In this paper, we present a proof-of-principle sublinear-time algorithm for solving SDPs with low-rank constraints; specifically, given an SDP with $m$ constraint matrices, each of dimension $n$ and rank $r$, our algorithm can compute any entry and efficient descriptions of the spectral decomposition of the solution matrix. The algorithm runs in time $O(m\cdot\mathrm{poly}(\log n,r,1/\varepsilon))$ given access to a sampling-based low-overhead data structure for the constraint matrices, where $\varepsilon$ is the precision of the solution. In addition, we apply our algorithm to a quantum state learning task as an application. Technically, our approach aligns with 1) SDP solvers based on the matrix multiplicative weight (MMW) framework by Arora and Kale [TOC '12]; 2) sampling-based dequantizing framework pioneered by Tang [STOC '19]. In order to compute the matrix exponential required in the MMW framework, we introduce two new techniques that may be of independent interest: $\bullet$ Weighted sampling: assuming sampling access to each individual constraint matrix $A_{1},\ldots,A_{\tau}$, we propose a procedure that gives a good approximation of $A=A_{1}+\cdots+A_{\tau}$. $\bullet$ Symmetric approximation: we propose a sampling procedure that gives the \emph{spectral decomposition} of a low-rank Hermitian matrix $A$. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first sampling-based algorithm for spectral decomposition, as previous works only give singular values and vectors.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2018

Quantum-inspired sublinear classical algorithms for solving low-rank linear systems

We present classical sublinear-time algorithms for solving low-rank linear systems of equations. Our algorithms are inspired by the HHL quantum algorithm for solving linear systems and the recent breakthrough by Tang of dequantizing the quantum algorithm for recommendation systems. Let $A \in \mathbb{C}^{m \times n}$ be a rank-$k$ matrix, and $b \in \mathbb{C}^m$ be a vector. We present two algorithms: a "sampling" algorithm that provides a sample from $A^{-1}b$ and a "query" algorithm that outputs an estimate of an entry of $A^{-1}b$, where $A^{-1}$ denotes the Moore-Penrose pseudo-inverse. Both of our algorithms have query and time complexity $O(\mathrm{poly}(k, \kappa, \|A\|_F, 1/\epsilon)\,\mathrm{polylog}(m, n))$, where $\kappa$ is the condition number of $A$ and $\epsilon$ is the precision parameter. Note that the algorithms we consider are sublinear time, so they cannot write and read the whole matrix or vectors. In this paper, we assume that $A$ and $b$ come with well-known low-overhead data structures such that entries of $A$ and $b$ can be sampled according to some natural probability distributions. Alternatively, when $A$ is positive semidefinite, our algorithms can be adapted so that the sampling assumption on $b$ is not required.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2018

Sample Efficient Algorithms for Learning Quantum Channels in PAC Model and the Approximate State Discrimination Problem

We generalize the PAC (probably approximately correct) learning model to the quantum world by generalizing the concepts from classical functions to quantum processes, defining the problem of \emph{PAC learning quantum process}, and study its sample complexity. In the problem of PAC learning quantum process, we want to learn an $\epsilon$-approximate of an unknown quantum process $c^*$ from a known finite concept class $C$ with probability $1-\delta$ using samples $\{(x_1,c^*(x_1)),(x_2,c^*(x_2)),\dots\}$, where $\{x_1,x_2, \dots\}$ are computational basis states sampled from an unknown distribution $D$ and $\{c^*(x_1),c^*(x_2),\dots\}$ are the (possibly mixed) quantum states outputted by $c^*$. The special case of PAC-learning quantum process under constant input reduces to a natural problem which we named as approximate state discrimination, where we are given copies of an unknown quantum state $c^*$ from an known finite set $C$, and we want to learn with probability $1-\delta$ an $\epsilon$-approximate of $c^*$ with as few copies of $c^*$ as possible. We show that the problem of PAC learning quantum process can be solved with $$O\left(\frac{\log|C| + \log(1/ \delta)} { \epsilon^2}\right)$$ samples when the outputs are pure states and $$O\left(\frac{\log^3 |C|(\log |C|+\log(1/ \delta))} { \epsilon^2}\right)$$ samples if the outputs can be mixed. Some implications of our results are that we can PAC-learn a polynomial sized quantum circuit in polynomial samples and approximate state discrimination can be solved in polynomial samples even when concept class size $|C|$ is exponential in the number of qubits, an exponentially improvement over a full state tomography.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2017

A Quantum-Proof Non-Malleable Extractor, With Application to Privacy Amplification against Active Quantum Adversaries

In privacy amplification, two mutually trusted parties aim to amplify the secrecy of an initial shared secret $X$ in order to establish a shared private key $K$ by exchanging messages over an insecure communication channel. If the channel is authenticated the task can be solved in a single round of communication using a strong randomness extractor; choosing a quantum-proof extractor allows one to establish security against quantum adversaries. In the case that the channel is not authenticated, Dodis and Wichs (STOC'09) showed that the problem can be solved in two rounds of communication using a non-malleable extractor, a stronger pseudo-random construction than a strong extractor. We give the first construction of a non-malleable extractor that is secure against quantum adversaries. The extractor is based on a construction by Li (FOCS'12), and is able to extract from source of min-entropy rates larger than $1/2$. Combining this construction with a quantum-proof variant of the reduction of Dodis and Wichs, shown by Cohen and Vidick (unpublished), we obtain the first privacy amplification protocol secure against active quantum adversaries.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2015

Oracles with Costs

While powerful tools have been developed to analyze quantum query complexity, there are still many natural problems that do not fit neatly into the black box model of oracles. We create a new model that allows multiple oracles with differing costs. This model captures more of the difficulty of certain natural problems. We test this model on a simple problem, Search with Two Oracles, for which we create a quantum algorithm that we prove is asymptotically optimal. We further give some evidence, using a geometric picture of Grover's algorithm, that our algorithm is exactly optimal.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2014

Upper bounds on quantum query complexity inspired by the Elitzur-Vaidman bomb tester

Inspired by the Elitzur-Vaidman bomb testing problem [arXiv:hep-th/9305002], we introduce a new query complexity model, which we call bomb query complexity $B(f)$. We investigate its relationship with the usual quantum query complexity $Q(f)$, and show that $B(f)=Θ(Q(f)^2)$. This result gives a new method to upper bound the quantum query complexity: we give a method of finding bomb query algorithms from classical algorithms, which then provide nonconstructive upper bounds on $Q(f)=Θ(\sqrt{B(f)})$. We subsequently were able to give explicit quantum algorithms matching our upper bound method. We apply this method on the single-source shortest paths problem on unweighted graphs, obtaining an algorithm with $O(n^{1.5})$ quantum query complexity, improving the best known algorithm of $O(n^{1.5}\sqrt{\log n})$ [arXiv:quant-ph/0606127]. Applying this method to the maximum bipartite matching problem gives an $O(n^{1.75})$ algorithm, improving the best known trivial $O(n^2)$ upper bound.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2014

Different Strategies for Optimization Using the Quantum Adiabatic Algorithm

We present the results of a numerical study, with 20 qubits, of the performance of the Quantum Adiabatic Algorithm on randomly generated instances of MAX 2-SAT with a unique assignment that maximizes the number of satisfied clauses. The probability of obtaining this assignment at the end of the quantum evolution measures the success of the algorithm. Here we report three strategies which consistently increase the success probability for the hardest instances in our ensemble: decreasing the overall evolution time, initializing the system in excited states, and adding a random local Hamiltonian to the middle of the evolution.

quant-ph↗