Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Hanna N. Kim

Publications and source records attributed to Hanna N. Kim.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Two disks maximize the third Robin eigenvalue: positive parameters

The third eigenvalue of the Robin Laplacian on a simply-connected planar domain of given area is bounded above by the corresponding eigenvalue of a disjoint union of two equal disks, for Robin parameters in $[-4π,4π]$. This sharp inequality was known previously only for negative parameters in $[-4π,0]$, by Girouard and Laugesen. Their proof fails for positive Robin parameters because the second eigenfunction on a disk has non-monotonic radial part. This difficulty is overcome for parameters in $(0,4π]$ by means of a degree-theoretic approach suggested by Karpukhin and Stern that yields suitably orthogonal trial functions.

math.SP↗

Second Laplacian eigenvalue on real projective space

In this paper, we prove an upper bound on the second non-zero Laplacian eigenvalue on $n$-dimensional real projective space. The sharp result for 2-dimensions was shown by Nadirashvili and Penskoi and later by Karpukhin when the metric degenerates to that of the disjoint union of a round projective space and a sphere. That conjecture is open in higher dimensions, but this paper proves it up to a constant factor that tends to 1 as the dimension tends to infinity. Also, we introduce a topological argument that deals with the orthogonality conditions in a single step proof.

math.SP↗

Maximization of the second Laplacian Eigenvalue on the Sphere

We prove a sharp isoperimetric inequality for the second nonzero eigenvalue of the Laplacian on $S^m$. For $S^{2}$, the second nonzero eigenvalue becomes maximal as the surface degenerates to two disjoint spheres, by a result of Nadirashvili for which Petrides later gave another proof. For higher dimensional spheres, the analogous upper bound was conjectured by Girouard, Nadirashvili and Polterovich. Our method to confirm the conjecture builds on Petrides' work and recent developments on the hyperbolic center of mass and provides also a simpler proof for $S^2$.

math.SP↗