Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Haydar Göral

Publications and source records attributed to Haydar Göral.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Box Progressions, Abelian Power-Free Morphisms and A Sieve Technique for the Template Method

Given balls and boxes both enumerated by the positive integers, we consider a sequential allocation of the balls into the boxes. We fix $\ell \ge 2$. Proceeding in increasing order of box labels, assign to each box the next $r$ smallest balls for some $ 1\leq r\leq\ell$. Given an integer $k\ge 3$, is there a natural number $N$ such that in any placement of $N$ balls into boxes, there exist $k$ balls whose labels and box labels each form a $k$-term arithmetic progression? We address this question by identifying abelian power-free fixed points of morphisms over a binary alphabet. We present sufficient conditions under which a morphism is abelian $k$-power-free. Our conditions extend Dekking's result over a binary alphabet and offer a weaker, yet more effective alternative to Carpi's. Combining Dekking's result with the template method of Currie and Rampersad, we develop a sieve technique that significantly reduces the number of parents that must be examined to establish abelian power-freeness. We then identify a binary morphism that is abelian 16-power free (but not abelian $15$-power free) with an abelian 14-power free fixed point, demonstrating the strength of our technique in verifying abelian power-freeness. Furthermore, we give a binary morphism which is not abelian power-free, yet has an abelian $5$-power free fixed point. These results offer novel examples of morphisms whose fixed points exhibit stronger abelian power-freeness than the corresponding morphisms.

math.CO↗

Arithmetic Nullstellensatz and Nonstandard Methods

In this study we find height bounds for polynomial rings over integral domains. We apply nonstandard methods and hence our constants will be ineffective. Then we find height bounds in the polynomial ring over algebraic numbers to test primality of an ideal. Furthermore we consider unique factorization domains and possible bounds for valuation rings and arithmetical functions.

math.LO↗