arXiv subjects

Heer Patel

Publications and source records attributed to Heer Patel.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

What Do Visualization Instructors Want Students to Learn? Introducing a Concept Inventory for Visualization Design

The term "visualization design" encompasses multiple concepts and skills that go well beyond current assessments of graphical perception and visualization literacy. In the context of education, what exactly should a student be able to do if they "know" visualization design? To answer this question, we draw on existing methodology from the field of education to propose a concept inventory for visualization design, i.e., a theoretical model capturing the most important concepts and skills commonly associated with visualization design. We initially draft the concept inventory using a qualitative analysis of course objectives from visualization course syllabi. Then, we iteratively refine the concept inventory by soliciting feedback from instructors through semi-structured interviews. Based on our experiences in developing the concept inventory, we reflect on open questions and future research directions in visualization education, such as developing assessments for visualization design (similar to those for visualization literacy) and providing automated assistance for learning and teaching visualization design. Our supplemental materials are available at https://osf.io/dma3f/.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2025

Preserving Sense of Agency: User Preferences for Robot Autonomy and User Control across Household Tasks

Roboticists often design with the assumption that assistive robots should be fully autonomous. However, it remains unclear whether users prefer highly autonomous robots, as prior work in assistive robotics suggests otherwise. High robot autonomy can reduce the user's sense of agency, which represents feeling in control of one's environment. How much control do users, in fact, want over the actions of robots used for in-home assistance? We investigate how robot autonomy levels affect users' sense of agency and the autonomy level they prefer in contexts with varying risks. Our study asked participants to rate their sense of agency as robot users across four distinct autonomy levels and ranked their robot preferences with respect to various household tasks. Our findings revealed that participants' sense of agency was primarily influenced by two factors: (1) whether the robot acts autonomously, and (2) whether a third party is involved in the robot's programming or operation. Notably, an end-user programmed robot highly preserved users' sense of agency, even though it acts autonomously. However, in high-risk settings, e.g., preparing a snack for a child with allergies, they preferred robots that prioritized their control significantly more. Additional contextual factors, such as trust in a third party operator, also shaped their preferences.

cs.RO↗

arXiv2025

Assessing GPT's Bias Towards Stigmatized Social Groups: An Intersectional Case Study on Nationality Prejudice and Psychophobia

Recent studies have separately highlighted significant biases within foundational large language models (LLMs) against certain nationalities and stigmatized social groups. This research investigates the ethical implications of these biases intersecting with outputs of widely-used GPT-3.5/4/4o LLMS. Through structured prompt series, we evaluate model responses to several scenarios involving American and North Korean nationalities with various mental disabilities. Findings reveal significant discrepancies in empathy levels with North Koreans facing greater negative bias, particularly when mental disability is also a factor. This underscores the need for improvements in LLMs designed with a nuanced understanding of intersectional identity.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2024

How do Observable Users Decompose D3 Code? A Qualitative Study

Many toolkit developers seek to streamline the visualization programming process through structured support such as prescribed templates and example galleries. However, few projects examine how users organize their own visualization programs and how their coding choices may deviate from the intents of toolkit developers, impacting visualization prototyping and design. Further, is it possible to infer users' reasoning indirectly through their code, even when users copy code from other sources? We explore this question through a qualitative analysis of 715 D3 programs on Observable. We identify three levels of program organization based on how users decompose their code into smaller blocks: Program-, Chart-, and Component-Level code decomposition, with a strong preference for Component-Level reasoning. In a series of interviews, we corroborate that these levels reflect how Observable users reason about visualization programs. We compare common user-made components with those theorized in the Grammar of Graphics to assess overlap in user and toolkit developer reasoning. We find that, while the Grammar of Graphics covers basic visualizations well, it falls short in describing complex visualization types, especially those with animation, interaction, and parameterization components. Our findings highlight how user practices differ from formal grammars and reinforce ongoing efforts to rethink visualization toolkit support, including augmenting learning tools and AI assistants to better reflect real-world coding strategies.

cs.HC↗